Jump to content

SDNY Subpoenas Trump Inaugural Committee


Tiberius

Recommended Posts

On 2/4/2019 at 10:38 PM, keepthefaith said:

 

AKA, a fishing expedition. 

Snowflake Republicans begging for mercy:

 

https://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/us_5c5c8263e4b0a502ca33612c/amp

 

 

Wow... Very unbecoming.  What's he got to hide?

 

The c uck old Republicans have sunk to a new dishonorable low.

 

Maybe if Trump didn't cause a Blue Wave and have 40+ Congressional seats flip, they could remain spineless.  Very Chamberlain-esque....are they really this spineless.

 

Claim victimhood, waaa Presidential harassment, Presidential harassment! Unacceptable!  Unacceptable!

 

 

 

Edited by ExiledInIllinois
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, ExiledInIllinois said:

Claim victimhood, waaa Presidential harassment, Presidential harassment! Unacceptable!  Unacceptable!

 

 

Trump has been drug through the mud like few people in history.

I kind of get your side though, because not only has he remained upright, he keeps delivering haymakers.

 

That must be quite disconcerting.

 

 

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, ExiledInIllinois said:

Relax, take a deep breath.  Ooops... Looks like I triggered you.

 

tenor.png

 

Wow, you've now managed to use two memes that originated as insults to liberal twats. You're so witty and clever.

 

What's next, are you going to clapback, savagely destroying me with one tweet by throwing shade that breaks the internet?

 

Unoriginal idiot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Hedge said:

 

Trump has been drug through the mud like few people in history.

I kind of get your side though, because not only has he remained upright, he keeps delivering haymakers.

 

That must be quite disconcerting.

 

 

Yeah... He's been dancing around, slicing and dicing.

 

This is more like it.  Trump is the Fop.  The Democrats the Highlander:

 

"(Quarter) neither asked nor given"

 

 

2 minutes ago, Koko78 said:

 

Wow, you've now managed to use two memes that originated as insults to liberal twats. You're so witty and clever.

 

What's next, are you going to clapback, savagely destroying me with one tweet by throwing shade that breaks the internet?

 

Unoriginal idiot.

If the shoe fits wear it.

methinks.jpg

 

Good times are upon us... Good times watching the Deplorable Snowflakes weasel and claw their immoral azzes out of this fine mess they dug themselves into.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, ExiledInIllinois said:

Good times are upon us... Good times watching the Deplorable Snowflakes weasel and claw their immoral azzes out of this fine mess they dug themselves into.

 

Yep! And just think, when the loony left finally get Trump "this time", we'll still have a crapton of federal judges who actually follow the law, including a  Supreme Court majority; a business friendly regulatory scheme; fair trade; border security that actually works; and a pullout of troops from the endless wars.

 

You guys are really going to show the rest of us! In January of 2025, anyhow.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Koko78 said:

 

Yep! And just think, when the loony left finally get Trump "this time", we'll still have a crapton of federal judges who actually follow the law, including a  Supreme Court majority; a business friendly regulatory scheme; fair trade; border security that actually works; and a pullout of troops from the endless wars.

 

You guys are really going to show the rest of us! In January of 2025, anyhow.

Roberts doesn't have the balls to turn society on its head:

 

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/roberts-joins-supreme-courts-liberal-wing-in-striking-down-louisiana-abortion-law

 

Bring conservative judges, it's jusr want the doctored ordered for what ills society.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, Koko78 said:

 

Wow, you've now managed to use two memes that originated as insults to liberal twats. You're so witty and clever.

 

What's next?

 

This is probably where he explains that what's next is to save the planet by taking all the money from the rich to provide free college and free health care, paid vacation and a pension to people who are unwilling to work. And he'll call this plan something like "The Green Dream" or something like that.

 

And THEN he'll show YOU what liberal witty and clever looks like.

 

Ignore him. He's smart enough to figure out how to post to a message board, and then the smarts come to a screeching halt.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Hedge said:

 

Trump has been drug through the mud like few people in history.

I kind of get your side though, because not only has he remained upright, he keeps delivering haymakers.

 

That must be quite disconcerting.

 

 

Dude has been a scumbag of the highest order ripping off contractors, preying on the little guy, etc. for years

 

Including publicly and loudly calling for the execution of five innocent young men

 

Dude was literally used as the inspiration for cartoonishly evil businessman-villains

 

Politics aside the man is despicable and if you're unable to recognize that he's unworthy of your trust or admiration that's on you, fam

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Avisan said:

Dude has been a scumbag of the highest order ripping off contractors, preying on the little guy, etc. for years

 

Including publicly and loudly calling for the execution of five innocent young men

 

Dude was literally used as the inspiration for cartoonishly evil businessman-villains

 

Politics aside the man is despicable and if you're unable to recognize that he's unworthy of your trust or admiration that's on you, fam

 

Yet despite these well worn factoids, he still beat the most qualified POTUS candidate in history.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Avisan said:

They're facts, not factoids, on account of their being true

 

No, they're factoids due to the editorializing of the facts.

 

And to reiterate, she's still roaming the woods of Chappaqua.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, GG said:

 

No, they're factoids due to the editorializing of the facts.

 

And to reiterate, she's still roaming the woods of Chappaqua.

There was zero editorializing involved

 

-His abuse of contractors is well documented

 

-The Central Park Five incident is also well documented

 

-Biff

 

This is extremely basic, factual, easily verifiable information from a broad range of sources.  You may decide that it doesn't affect your view of the political landscape, but the facts themselves are indisputable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Avisan said:

There was zero editorializing involved

 

-His abuse of contractors is well documented

 

-The Central Park Five incident is also well documented

 

-Biff

 

This is extremely basic, factual, easily verifiable information from a broad range of sources.  You may decide that it doesn't affect your view of the political landscape, but the facts themselves are indisputable.

 

Let's examine the facts as you presented them, ahem devoid of editorializing

 

 

Quote

 

Dude has been a scumbag of the highest order ripping off contractors, preying on the little guy, etc. for years

 

Prove the facts

 

Quote

Including publicly and loudly calling for the execution of five innocent young men

 

Presuming you're talking about the Central Park Five - they were clearly innocent of rape.  But not innocent of what else happened that night.

 

Quote

 

Dude was literally used as the inspiration for cartoonishly evil businessman-villains

 

Prove the facts

 

Quote

 

Politics aside the man is despicable and if you're unable to recognize that he's unworthy of your trust or admiration that's on you, fam


 

 

 

Not editorializing, huh?

  • Like (+1) 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, GG said:

 

Let's examine the facts as you presented them, ahem devoid of editorializing

 

 

 

Prove the facts

 

 

Presuming you're talking about the Central Park Five - they were clearly innocent of rape.  But not innocent of what else happened that night.

 

 

Prove the facts

 

 

Not editorializing, huh?

 

Editorials are fact, when you believe them.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...