RochesterRob Posted February 7, 2019 Posted February 7, 2019 On 2/7/2019 at 4:23 AM, row_33 said: How many wrong and dumb posts can Tibs make in an 8 year Trump admin? roughly 35 a day and 365 days a year and 8 years.... that’s over 102,000 not even counting the wrong and dumb posts the whole 2016 campaign Expand For what Soros is paying him that works out to a penny per post. I'd go looking for work elsewhere but I guess there is something to be said for job satisfaction. 1
Bray Wyatt Posted February 7, 2019 Posted February 7, 2019 (edited) On 2/7/2019 at 4:23 AM, row_33 said: How many wrong and dumb posts can Tibs make in an 8 year Trump admin? roughly 35 a day and 365 days a year and 8 years.... that’s over 102,000 not even counting the wrong and dumb posts the whole 2016 campaign Expand You are low balling him I think, 35 a day? He has to do more than that lol And imagine if Trump wins re-election, he will be going bonkers that post count will sky rocket! Edited February 7, 2019 by Bray Wyatt 2
row_33 Posted February 7, 2019 Posted February 7, 2019 On 2/7/2019 at 2:18 PM, Bray Wyatt said: You are low balling him I think, 35 a day? He has to do more than that lol And imagine if Trump wins re-election, he will be going bonkers that post count will sky rocket! Expand i try to take the kind and high road on arguments
Hedge Posted February 9, 2019 Posted February 9, 2019 On 2/6/2019 at 12:28 AM, Deranged Rhino said: https://thehill.com/regulation/administration/428582-ginsburg-not-expected-at-trumps-state-of-the-union?amp&__twitter_impression=true Who's shocked? Totally unsubstantiated gossip - but more than one person told me the "concert" last night was a memorial service. Expand Does this sync up with what you have heard? 1
Foxx Posted February 10, 2019 Posted February 10, 2019 (edited) https://twitter.com/POTUSPress/status/1094679828043915265 Edited February 10, 2019 by Foxx 2
Paulus Posted February 10, 2019 Posted February 10, 2019 On 2/10/2019 at 8:03 PM, Foxx said: https://twitter.com/POTUSPress/status/1094679828043915265 Expand No way! Best time line ever!
/dev/null Posted February 10, 2019 Posted February 10, 2019 how long until somebody files a FOIA on the health of RBG?
Koko78 Posted February 10, 2019 Posted February 10, 2019 On 2/10/2019 at 8:40 PM, /dev/null said: how long until somebody files a FOIA on the health of RBG? Expand They can file whatever they want, no one is getting her medical information, unless they perfect her clone enough to authorize it. 1
row_33 Posted February 10, 2019 Posted February 10, 2019 Hard to say, they made a pact not to release medical records for 150 years due to what has to be on Slick Willie’s charts...
/dev/null Posted February 10, 2019 Posted February 10, 2019 On 2/10/2019 at 9:08 PM, Koko78 said: They can file whatever they want, no one is getting her medical information, unless they perfect her clone enough to authorize it. Expand jokes aside, consider the legal ramifications for SCOTUS decisions cast in doubt whether a Justice is of sound mind or if a deciding vote is cast by someone other than the Justice if i'm on the losing side of a 5-4 decision with RBG in the majority, I'm refusing to accept the results unless she is present at the ruling 5 1
row_33 Posted February 10, 2019 Posted February 10, 2019 On 2/10/2019 at 9:59 PM, /dev/null said: jokes aside, consider the legal ramifications for SCOTUS decisions cast in doubt whether a Justice is of sound mind or if a deciding vote is cast by someone other than the Justice if i'm on the losing side of a 5-4 decision with RBG in the majority, I'm refusing to accept the results unless she is present at the ruling Expand Roberts will gladly give the same opinion as a disabled RBG
boyst Posted February 10, 2019 Posted February 10, 2019 On 2/10/2019 at 8:03 PM, Foxx said: https://twitter.com/POTUSPress/status/1094679828043915265 Expand There is no blue checkmark on this
Numark3 Posted February 10, 2019 Posted February 10, 2019 (edited) On 2/10/2019 at 9:59 PM, /dev/null said: jokes aside, consider the legal ramifications for SCOTUS decisions cast in doubt whether a Justice is of sound mind or if a deciding vote is cast by someone other than the Justice if i'm on the losing side of a 5-4 decision with RBG in the majority, I'm refusing to accept the results unless she is present at the ruling Expand "refusing to accept the results" What in the world are you going to do about it...appeal it? Edited February 10, 2019 by Crayola64
boyst Posted February 10, 2019 Posted February 10, 2019 On 2/10/2019 at 11:20 PM, Crayola64 said: "refusing to accept the results" What in the world are you going to do about it...appeal it? Expand File a lawsuit charging validation of the claim. Trust me. Whatever ruling comes next, if it is 5-4, will be primed for this debate. I'm betting every ruling to come will be 6-3 or greater. I'm betting every ruling will be this so they can protect themselves. That is until the gig will be up
Koko78 Posted February 10, 2019 Posted February 10, 2019 On 2/10/2019 at 9:59 PM, /dev/null said: jokes aside, consider the legal ramifications for SCOTUS decisions cast in doubt whether a Justice is of sound mind or if a deciding vote is cast by someone other than the Justice if i'm on the losing side of a 5-4 decision with RBG in the majority, I'm refusing to accept the results unless she is present at the ruling Expand The court would lose all legitimacy if RBG was incapacitated and someone was voting in her stead. However, the problems with her being incapacitated are 1.) proving it; and 2.) appealing it. 1
boyst Posted February 10, 2019 Posted February 10, 2019 On 2/10/2019 at 11:25 PM, Koko78 said: The court would lose all legitimacy if RBG was incapacitated and someone was voting in her stead. However, the problems with her being incapacitated are 1.) proving it; and 2.) appealing it. Expand It'd be incivility to arise. However, the current desire of the left having their positions - one is the abolishment of SCOTUS.
/dev/null Posted February 10, 2019 Posted February 10, 2019 On 2/10/2019 at 11:20 PM, Crayola64 said: "refusing to accept the results" What in the world are you going to do about it...appeal it? Expand RBG is likely a member of at least one states Bar Association File a legal malpractice suit against her, requiring her to appear in court. When she refuses to appear, file an appeal with the Federal Appeals court on the grounds that the SCOTUS ruling is fraudulent
Koko78 Posted February 10, 2019 Posted February 10, 2019 On 2/10/2019 at 11:29 PM, /dev/null said: RBG is likely a member of at least one states Bar Association File a legal malpractice suit against her, requiring her to appear in court. When she refuses to appear, file an appeal with the Federal Appeals court on the grounds that the SCOTUS ruling is fraudulent Expand Judges have absolute immunity from lawsuits. Ethics complaints can be handled through counsel - if they even get that far. You don't think Justice Kavanaugh appeared before the 10th Circuit, do you? As an aside, judges can't actually commit "malpractice" because they are prohibited from practicing law.
IDBillzFan Posted February 10, 2019 Posted February 10, 2019 On 2/10/2019 at 11:20 PM, Crayola64 said: "refusing to accept the results" What in the world are you going to do about it...appeal it? Expand I don't think it's out of the question to ask that an 85-year-old 27-pound US Supreme Court Justice who just had surgery for lung cancer, and who has not been seen in public since, is alive, alert and coherent. I don't care which side of the aisle she nods off on, If she is able to hear cases and rule on them, she should be able to do so from a live feed, no? 3
Recommended Posts