Jump to content

McCarron Traded!


Alphadawg7

Recommended Posts

Just now, SouthNYfan said:

 

Says the Alabama homer.

Guess who makes billions per year with "no credibility"?

ESPN.

Guess who makes nothing off his zero credibility?

You.

 

What did you say about Foster making the team again? 0 chance?

 

And what did you say about Coleman? Stone cold lock to make the team?

 

You’re consistent. Consistently wrong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Shaw66 said:

That's REALLY unfair.  There's a very clear trajectory for guys like McCarron, the McCown trajectory.   He's a good guy, hard working, he keeps learning.  Because he's only marginal, he doesn't stick with teams.   Teams have to perceive a need for a guy like this.  The need grows as they get older, because they're important in the QB room.  They become solid backups.   But early in their careers, they move a lot, because they are only marginal - they are on the margins of being useful.  

 

Your backup QB is almost NEVER starter material.   Good QBs don't stay on the bench long.   But that doesn't mean he isn't or can't be a good backup.  

 

If he was the kind of backup teams love them why did we trade him?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Sky Diver said:

 

What did you say about Foster making the team again? 0 chance?

 

And what did you say about Coleman? Stone cold lock to make the team?

 

You’re consistent. Consistently wrong.

 

Foster making the team is idiotic.

Cutting Coleman is idiotic.

We basically just traded a 7th round pick for $3.5 of dead cap and didn't even give him more than a couple of weeks to adjust.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, SouthNYfan said:

 

Foster making the team is idiotic.

Cutting Coleman is idiotic.

We basically just traded a 7th round pick for $3.5 of dead cap and didn't even give him more than a couple of weeks to adjust.

 

No, making dumb predictions is idiotic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hedging your bets that Peterman can hold down the reigns until Allen is ready is a risky bet. Historical odds are stacked against Peterman playing at any kind of consistent NFL level. And throwing Allen into an offense with problems all over the field worries me.

 

I’d liked to have seen Allen stay on the bench until next year but I think he’s going to be seeing the field sooner than later in a season I’m not terribly optimistic about.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Paulus said:

That's a bald faced lie.

 

 

And, screw your false dilemma

 

 

It's right there in the thread dude. Look at Peace Frogs post, and the post quoted in it.

 

edit: haha, truce, there were 2 different posts we were looking at. We're both right or both wrong. I'll leave it at that.

Edited by DrDawkinstein
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, SouthNYfan said:

 

If he was the kind of backup teams love them why did we trade him?

Like I said, he's marginal.   That means he's useful to some teams, not others.  Bills believe either that the two they have are good enough to be starter and backup, or they believe they're just building for next season.   In either scenario, AJ was expendable.   Gruden has a different view of what he's doing and where his team is, and AJ offered him what he needed in a backup.  

5 minutes ago, eanyills said:

Hedging your bets that Peterman can hold down the reigns until Allen is ready is a risky bet. Historical odds are stacked against Peterman playing at any kind of consistent NFL level. And throwing Allen into an offense with problems all over the field worries me.

 

I’d liked to have seen Allen stay on the bench until next year but I think he’s going to be seeing the field sooner than later in a season I’m not terribly optimistic about.

Not much riskier than going with McCarron.   Neither has much experience, and neither has produced.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Alphadawg7 said:

Funny, everyone was certain AJ was gonna be cut Sunday, now everyone is acting like they knew he wouldn’t be and that It’s no surprise and was obvious.  

 

Persoanlly, given the weakness at some other positions, I didn’t think we would keep 3 QBs given Allen has progressed well and doesn’t seem that far off from being capable of starting.  

 

But it also doesnt surprise me given none of the QBs are proven really in an actual NFL Game, all showed positives and negatives in camp and preseason, and our OL got 2 of them dinged up already this preseason.  

 

Do say everybody.  I argued that he would unlikely be cut.  He was going to be on the team or be traded.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, OldTimeAFLGuy said:

 

Patriots have cut QB Danny Etling .........

He would be an excellent choice.  I mean, he's a UDFA who couldn't make an NFL roster, so he's certainly not going to come in and light the offense on fire, but he's spent an entire offseason with one of the best teams in the NFL, and they are good in part because of the way the emphasize a lot of the things Sean McDermott emphasizes: doing your job, attention to detail and personal discipline.  Secondly, he has learned the terminology of the Erhard-Perkins offensive system.  Given that Brian Daboll has spend a significant amount of time with New England under Josh McDaniel and runs the same system, there's going to be a much easier learning curve than if they pick up a castoff QB from a West Coast offense team.  Moreover, if Leslie Frasier wants to, he can always pick Ettling's brain on what the evil genius and Josh McDaniel have been doing this summer. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...