Fadingpain Posted July 30, 2018 Share Posted July 30, 2018 I'd be eager to hear a report as well. But having read some of the details of train travel, I'm thinking flying on a plane isn't such a bad idea, and I hate flying on planes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Augie Posted July 30, 2018 Share Posted July 30, 2018 1 hour ago, Foxx said: thanks! i'll report, no problem. I am a notoriously bad sleeper so i don't know that i'll notice much difference. i thought about the sleeping car but, i couldn't justify the enormous cost difference. i figured if i could be slightly inconvienced on the travel, my time at the beach house would be that much richer. i'll try and post pictures, if they are small enough. i'll only have my phone so no fancy computer work to resize them is gonna happen unfortunately. My wife says with the sound of my snoring nobody will be able to hear the train. That’s bad, right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DrW Posted July 30, 2018 Share Posted July 30, 2018 Did Orlando - San Antonio in 2005 with my then 5-year-old; two nights in reclining seats, but quite comfortable. We both enjoyed the trip tremendously. Through Louisiana, they had a ranger from the National Park Service in the lounge car who explained the history and nature of the area. Food in the dining car was fine, better that economy-class airline meals. I can confirm that as a party of two you are seated in the dining car with another party of two. Usually, I would have liked to avoid such a situation. However, with Daniel it was no problem; he was the darling of the old ladies on the train. The most memorable incident (especially considering that it occurred in the Deep South): A few rows ahead of us was a young mother (white) with a 3-4 year-old child. The kid made a mess throwing chips all over the place; it looked like a pigsty. The conductor (a ~50 year-old black gentleman) handed the mother a carpet roller, and she cleaned up the mess. I have to admit that I do not know if (a) he told her to clean up the mess, or (b) she asked for the roller and he gave it to her. (a) would be funnier, but (b) seems more likely. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ExiledInIllinois Posted July 31, 2018 Share Posted July 31, 2018 2 hours ago, \GoBillsInDallas/ said: IMHO: We did the x-country trip 5 years ago, Seattle to Chicago (flew on the other legs of the trip). 1. Seat only? Big mistake - you'll regret it instantly. Spend the nut and get the bedroom. The bedroom is worth every penny. 2. No wifi - bring your computer and make sure you have a good data plan on the phone. 3. For most of the trip, you'll have to tape your phone to the window to get decent data service. 4. You'll be the youngest person on the train by far. 5. Wait until you try to take a dump on a moving train. 6. A seat by itself does not give you access to a shower. 7. The train runs late - REALLY late. Anywhere from 6 to 20 hours late. The freight trains have priority for the entire route. 8. The food is OK, but BYOB. 9. The seats do not have individual outlets. There are outlets on the wall but it means putting a cord over the person sitting in the window seat (or having them put it over you). Nice breakdown! Back in the day my father worked freight on Erie-Lackawanna RR... He always said passenger trains had priority... I guess train travel was the norm back then. Now it is reversed... Don't know why! On the waterways... It is still commercial passenger (on a schedule) that gets priority over commercial cargo. You would think that they would go back to that on rail. Probably why the Amtraks get stuck/wait in SouthChicago/NWIndiana... Freight is being pushed through that clustereff around Southern Tip of Lake Michigan. The bellyaching up of a storm of the boats trying to get the bridges (on the VHF marine radio) gets to be annoying... Trains queued up for miles both ways. I tell them to stop whining... It's annoying, can't clear a train and have it crash into a drink because marine interests wanna get through on a whim... You missed that part since you flew east out of Chicago... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KD in CA Posted July 31, 2018 Share Posted July 31, 2018 69 hours with only a seat as a base? Ouch. Never done it but think I'd need to have the private room/bed. 3 hours ago, Foxx said: yeah, i will be hooking up up with a girl from Toronto here in Roch to start the trip and having another friend step on in LaCrosse WI. should be a rocking time, about 20 days in toto. So the wife's not all bad if she's signing off on that! 16 minutes ago, ExiledInIllinois said: Back in the day my father worked freight on Erie-Lackawanna RR... He always said passenger trains had priority... I guess train travel was the norm back then. Now it is reversed... Don't know why! Come on man, money talks! Can't pause the wheels of commerce for a bunch of people paying $200 on the night train! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PromoTheRobot Posted July 31, 2018 Share Posted July 31, 2018 (edited) Traveling from Worcester to Buffalo once, I realized there is no mobile cell data along rail lines. I felt like a junkie going through withdrawl. Edited July 31, 2018 by PromoTheRobot 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ExiledInIllinois Posted July 31, 2018 Share Posted July 31, 2018 1 hour ago, KD in CA said: Come on man, money talks! Can't pause the wheels of commerce for a bunch of people paying $200 on the night train! Yeah, I suppose you are very right! But, it doesn't promote more train traffic, getting away from air travel. You would think they would promote other forms of travel. Air has the market. Anyway... What is round trip Rochester to Seattle Airfare? Can't be that expensive? $600 bucks and you are there in 6 hours... 69 hours is three days in a seat. I may opt for sleeper and shower access. 43 minutes ago, PromoTheRobot said: Traveling from Worcester to Buffalo once, I realized there is no mobile cell data along rail lines. I felt like a junkie going through withdrawl. I wonder why that is so... Wouldn't be like the road, cell coverage overlapping? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PromoTheRobot Posted July 31, 2018 Share Posted July 31, 2018 1 minute ago, ExiledInIllinois said: I wonder why that is so... Wouldn't be like the road, cell coverage overlapping? My guess is cell companies want data where cars drive more than where trains roll. More users. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo716 Posted July 31, 2018 Share Posted July 31, 2018 Have fun and drink booze ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KD in CA Posted July 31, 2018 Share Posted July 31, 2018 8 hours ago, ExiledInIllinois said: Yeah, I suppose you are very right! But, it doesn't promote more train traffic, getting away from air travel. You would think they would promote other forms of travel. Air has the market. Anyway... What is round trip Rochester to Seattle Airfare? Can't be that expensive? $600 bucks and you are there in 6 hours... 69 hours is three days in a seat. I may opt for sleeper and shower access. I wonder why that is so... Wouldn't be like the road, cell coverage overlapping? Exactly. Despite the security hassles and ridiculous stories pushed in a media everytime there is some dispute between a flight attendant and some jerk passenger, air travel is efficient, effective and safe. Because they have mastered their inventory management, the prices have stayed fairly reasonable if you put some effort into planning. I get the appeal of rail travel if you are not in a hurry or hopping between Northeast/Mid-Atlantic cities, but otherwise it's comparing 19th century travel to modern day alternatives. I got from SF to Cape Cod on Saturday in nine hours, including a leisurely dinner stop. Hard to beat that. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ExiledInIllinois Posted July 31, 2018 Share Posted July 31, 2018 4 minutes ago, KD in CA said: Exactly. Despite the security hassles and ridiculous stories pushed in a media everytime there is some dispute between a flight attendant and some jerk passenger, air travel is efficient, effective and safe. Because they have mastered their inventory management, the prices have stayed fairly reasonable if you put some effort into planning. I get the appeal of rail travel if you are not in a hurry or hopping between Northeast/Mid-Atlantic cities, but otherwise it's comparing 19th century travel to modern day alternatives. I got from SF to Cape Cod on Saturday in nine hours, including a leisurely dinner stop. Hard to beat that. Yep... But 3 days on train... I think I am still getting a sleeper!!! Think of it as a hotel room! Then again... He's married and traveling with another chick across state lines... Gotta keep up appearances...LoL!!! Just kidding around Foxx!! There is probably something in the Mann Act dating back to when train travel was king! BTW... To sum up Mann Act: Mann Act n. a federal statute making it a crime to transport a woman across state lines for "immoral" purposes. The Mann Act was intended to prevent the movement of prostitutes from one state to another or in and out of the country in the so-called "white slave" trade. However, it also applies to a male taking his under-age girlfriend to a love-nest in a neighboring state, or a female transporting an underage boy across the state line for such purposes. Maximum term is five years in a federal prison. Boyst has probably broken it numerous times, even on the same night! ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KD in CA Posted July 31, 2018 Share Posted July 31, 2018 1 minute ago, ExiledInIllinois said: Yep... But 3 days on train... I think I am still getting a sleeper!!! Think of it as a hotel room! Then again... He's married and traveling with another chick across state lines... Gotta keep up appearances...LoL!!! Just kidding around Foxx!! There is probably something in the Mann Act dating back to when train travel was king! BTW... To sum up Mann Act: Mann Act n. a federal statute making it a crime to transport a woman across state lines for "immoral" purposes. The Mann Act was intended to prevent the movement of prostitutes from one state to another or in and out of the country in the so-called "white slave" trade. However, it also applies to a male taking his under-age girlfriend to a love-nest in a neighboring state, or a female transporting an underage boy across the state line for such purposes. Maximum term is five years in a federal prison. Boyst has probably broken it numerous times, even on the same night! ? Foxx is the Mann!!!! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thirdborn Posted July 31, 2018 Share Posted July 31, 2018 16 hours ago, Foxx said: the fast food combo thread made me wonder about this.... in the later third of the month, i will be traveling across the country from Roch to Seattle, WA. it really is a pretty good deal. the trip will take roughly 69 hours and costs roughly $200 each way. a leisurely trip where i can sleep when i want, not have to worry about watching the road (not to mention the cost of gas) nor falling out of the sky. will get to see the countryside of this great nation, really looking forward to seeing the Tetons. questions are, has anyone done this before? what is the food like? will i be able to sleep upright in a reserved coach seat, does it recline? they have showers so that shouldn't be a problem. perhaps there is something that i may have overlooked or not thought of? any advice would be greatly appreciated. very much looking forward to it. I've made that trip on amtrak . I love travelling by train. I went coach in one direction, and I'll never do that again. could not sleep at all. Paid a bunch more for a sleeper "closet". It was worth every dime. Food was the bar car, and what I brought with me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fr. Jerk Posted July 31, 2018 Share Posted July 31, 2018 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jauronimo Posted July 31, 2018 Share Posted July 31, 2018 I did Amtrak from Rochester to Chicago and back. It was about 14 hours each way. Never again will I travel by train in this country. The people are disgusting, the train is not comfortable, frequent delays and stoppages. It was miserable and not much cheaper than air travel. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ExiledInIllinois Posted July 31, 2018 Share Posted July 31, 2018 5 minutes ago, Jauronimo said: I did Amtrak from Rochester to Chicago and back. It was about 14 hours each way. Never again will I travel by train in this country. The people are disgusting, the train is not comfortable, frequent delays and stoppages. It was miserable and not much cheaper than air travel. So America wasn't really "great" when train travel was king/norm? Like hell do I want to turn the clock back Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Misterbluesky Posted July 31, 2018 Share Posted July 31, 2018 21 hours ago, ExiledInIllinois said: 69 hours... I stopped right there... LoL... Just kidding. Sounds gr8, just pray you don't get douchebag set of passengers along for the ride. That's only $2.89/hour... Not bad! LoL...? This is why people hitchhike. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ExiledInIllinois Posted July 31, 2018 Share Posted July 31, 2018 (edited) 4 minutes ago, Misterbluesky said: This is why people hitchhike. Had a friend... Much older, Vietnam Vet. Went to SF in 1967. Ran out of money. Was trying to get back to Chicago and home. Hanging with other vagrants in Nevada town. Sheriff picked him up, drove to the edge of town... By rail line... Said this train goes to Chicago. 5 Days later he was pulling into Blue Island, Illinois on Western Avenue. LoL... I said: "Had a friend." Sadly he passed away @ 65 in 2012... Edited July 31, 2018 by ExiledInIllinois Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuffaloBud Posted July 31, 2018 Share Posted July 31, 2018 Gee - this just bombs my vision that current train travel would be like "North by Northwest" all to heck. Durn!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
plenzmd1 Posted July 31, 2018 Share Posted July 31, 2018 20 hours ago, \GoBillsInDallas/ said: IMHO: We did the x-country trip 5 years ago, Seattle to Chicago (flew on the other legs of the trip). 1. Seat only? Big mistake - you'll regret it instantly. Spend the nut and get the bedroom. The bedroom is worth every penny. 2. No wifi - bring your computer and make sure you have a good data plan on the phone. 3. For most of the trip, you'll have to tape your phone to the window to get decent data service. 4. You'll be the youngest person on the train by far. 5. Wait until you try to take a dump on a moving train. 6. A seat by itself does not give you access to a shower. 7. The train runs late - REALLY late. Anywhere from 6 to 20 hours late. The freight trains have priority for the entire route. 8. The food is OK, but BYOB. 9. The seats do not have individual outlets. There are outlets on the wall but it means putting a cord over the person sitting in the window seat (or having them put it over you). I agree with ALL of this. Foxx , do they have the roomettes on this train? Not a full sleeper car, but decent enough. Two seats , fold into a bed, private room with a door. Sink and a toilet in there, ( but I always go the public restroom, ) access to shower, includes your food. That is one long trip sleeping in a chair and just overall not getting up and going for a run etc. and yes, trains are always freaking late and WiFi sucks. And i I am with GBID, make sure to BYOB if you are a drinker. Booze just as expensive on the train as it is in a plane. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts