Jump to content

Here you can admit that yes, it CAN get worse than Taylor


Recommended Posts

On 11/21/2017 at 3:11 PM, Air it out Fitzy said:

 

Bears are in a much better place than Bills. 

 

Id take Trubisky or Watson over our pair of busted qbs anyday 

 

Hot start for Watson, slow start for Trubisky. 

 

300 yards vs Green Bay, game tieing/winning drive this past weekend foiled by missed Fg.  

 

Plenty of promise in both.    You know a Gm that would take our guys over either ?    Nope.   

 

 

One week ago you couldn't get enough of Peterman. Go figure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/19/2017 at 5:09 PM, Bangarang said:

Transplant couldn’t be happier right now. He gets to say I told you so and Tyrod gets to be our starter again. 

 

You mean like the Anti TT people were doing last week before the Peterman disaster after TT got benched?  LMAO..."I told you so" is the heart and soul of TSW lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, transplantbillsfan said:

 

Not a reason to throw significantly worse in the game just because it can get better :flirt:

 

did it really get that much better? I mean, that's digging really deep to try and find any consolation in that game. 

 

I wasn't sure they were going to put taylor back in and then when they did I thought no way it can get any worse (which this play does not equal worse than the kid but it sure as hell didn't look any better at the time) then this play happened and it was then, I shut the damn game off. 

 

giphy.gif

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, DaBillsFanSince1973 said:

 

did it really get that much better? I mean, that's digging really deep to try and find any consolation in that game. 

 

I wasn't sure they were going to put taylor back in and then when they did I thought no way it can get any worse (which this play does not equal worse than the kid but it sure as hell didn't look any better at the time) then this play happened and it was then, I shut the damn game off. 

 

giphy.gif

 

 

 

So you didn't watch most of the half Taylor played? 1 turnover to 5 turnovers that almost turned to 7? Yeah that alone is much better... without even factoring in the positive plays.

 

 

Happy Thanksgiving!!! :thumbsup:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, transplantbillsfan said:

 

So you didn't watch most of the half Taylor played? 1 turnover to 5 turnovers that almost turned to 7? Yeah that alone is much better... without even factoring in the positive plays.

 

 

Happy Thanksgiving!!! :thumbsup:

 

 

what for? maybe in your mind he could of made a come back after being down 30? or maybe you just like to see taylor play and it was reason enough for you to keep watching? I saw it go to 47-10 after that play and said there are better things in life to do than to watch that garbage.

 

hell, I may not even make it past the half this next game if their getting their ass handed to them like the last 3 weeks? before you go and question why I should or shouldn't watch or if it means I'm more or less a fan, I'm not dedicated enough to waste my time watching a beat down.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, transplantbillsfan said:

 

So you didn't watch most of the half Taylor played? 1 turnover to 5 turnovers that almost turned to 7? Yeah that alone is much better... without even factoring in the positive plays.

 

 

Happy Thanksgiving!!! :thumbsup:

I think TT has 60 something total TDs and only 20 total turnovers. Why DaBills focussed on that one play when he knows TT rarely turns the ball over, to me, is sour grapes because he really pushed for Peterman. But he's a good poster overall.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, JM2009 said:

I think TT has 60 something total TDs and only 20 total turnovers. Why DaBills focussed on that one play when he knows TT rarely turns the ball over, to me, is sour grapes because he really pushed for Peterman. But he's a good poster overall.

 

why I did was to let the OP know, even taylor looked bad in that game. one looking better than the other made no real difference anyway, they were not winning that game. the only stats that matter are in the w/l column. you can boast, post and sling stats around all day, if they're not winning football games, making the post season ( has taylor made the post season yet?) then those stats are irrelevant.

 

I did not PUSH for peterman. I pulled for him to do well, why not? I'm tired of taylor, seen enough of him. but, until they're officially eliminated dec 2nd, I'll have to see taylor under center. then, when they're 5-7 it wont matter how much anyone wants to see taylor because they will likely allow peterman to finish the last 4 meaningless games and take his lumps so that during the off season they can evaluate his future, as well as taylors.

 

 

Edited by DaBillsFanSince1973
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, DaBillsFanSince1973 said:

 

did it really get that much better? I mean, that's digging really deep to try and find any consolation in that game. 

 

I wasn't sure they were going to put taylor back in and then when they did I thought no way it can get any worse (which this play does not equal worse than the kid but it sure as hell didn't look any better at the time) then this play happened and it was then, I shut the damn game off. 

 

giphy.gif

 

 

2:03 on the clock when the ball is snapped. 2:00 on the clock when he's stripped of the ball. I was told Taylor holds the ball too long*.

 

(He does on some plays but oh man did Ingram and Bosa dominate last week)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, JM2009 said:

I think TT has 60 something total TDs and only 20 total turnovers. Why DaBills focussed on that one play when he knows TT rarely turns the ball over, to me, is sour grapes because he really pushed for Peterman. But he's a good poster overall.

 

This is what makes me laugh about All-22 reviews where the writer will use only 3-4 plays from a game where 60+ plays were run. It's the ultimate cherry pick and a lot of people will eat it up and run with it one way or the other. Whatever fits their own personal agenda and narrative. 

 

Taylor is a good QB. Only in Buffalo is he not valued the way that he should be and I've lost all confidence in the current front office and coaching staff. 

Edited by Theshallowcross
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Theshallowcross said:

 

This is what makes me laugh about All-22 reviews where the writer will use only 3-4 plays from a game where 60+ plays were run. It's the ultimate cherry pick and a lot of people will eat it up and run with it one way or the other. Whatever fits their own personal agenda and narrative. 

 

Taylor is a good QB. Only in Buffalo is he not valued the way that he should be and I've lost all confidence in the current front office and coaching staff. 

My problem with the agenda people is what QB have we had that could do better than TT the answer is none. Then their response is "if your satisfied with 8-8"and so on. As if these rosters have had SB talent on them.

Edited by JM2009
  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Theshallowcross said:

 

This is what makes me laugh about All-22 reviews where the writer will use only 3-4 plays from a game where 60+ plays were run. It's the ultimate cherry pick and a lot of people will eat it up and run with it one way or the other. Whatever fits their own personal agenda and narrative. 

 

Taylor is a good QB. Only in Buffalo is he not valued the way that he should be and I've lost all confidence in the current front office and coaching staff. 

 

He's the best we have , but he's not good enough to carry the team on his shoulder......he's average...not good....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Theshallowcross said:

 

 

Taylor is a good QB. Only in Buffalo is he not valued the way that he should be and I've lost all confidence in the current front office and coaching staff. 

 

we shall see. he had the opportunity to shop himself last year, and he came back to Buffalo on a greatly reduced salary. 

 

I am willing to bet he signs somewhere for backup money and the opportunity to compete for a starting job. Good backup money in the neighborhood of $7-$9 M, but certainly not $18M starter money.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Iron Maiden said:

 

He's the best we have , but he's not good enough to carry the team on his shoulder......he's average...not good....

 

This is problem I have though honestly. He is above average but you're right that he can't carry a team on his shoulders. If you're being honest with yourself though there are only a handful of those guys in football anyway and I would even say maybe 2 quarterbacks in the entire league that can carry a team on their backs (Brady and Rodgers) and there is the end of the list. 

 

So you hitch your ship to a guy that can win you games by being accurate and not turning the ball over and you build around that guy. Taylor has 61 TDs in his Bills career with only 15 interceptions. He has a 62.9 completion %. He has suffered from poor defenses in his 3 years and a revolving door at OC. Dennison is the worst and most inept of the bunch. 

 

We need to build the team around him. Not gut the team of talent and scapegoat Taylor. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...