The Process Posted October 8, 2017 Share Posted October 8, 2017 (edited) Good = Consistent in the NFL. Is anyone sick of the commentators reviewing the play (sack) from a higher angle.....and you can see receivers that Brady would have hit all day long. Just makes me wonder if Peterman could. Edited October 8, 2017 by The Process Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MarlinTheMagician Posted October 8, 2017 Author Share Posted October 8, 2017 Yeah, when I said he was "okay" I was not praising TT. Or damning with faint praise. I thought he had a tough game. By "okay" I meant he was - meh. Mediocre. Not a positive difference maker, but really not why we lost all things considered. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Game Manager Posted October 8, 2017 Share Posted October 8, 2017 You have all of 6 posts dude. You couldn't possibly have made that assessment. You disagree with my statement ? I've watched the posts for 2 months now. Just telling you what I see every time I see that guys avatar. Guess I'll apologize for stating the obvious, have a good day. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HappyDays Posted October 8, 2017 Share Posted October 8, 2017 But you said only 5 more consistent passers the other day? I am here to call out the Cult because that is what they do. When he is good they make brash statements and then when he lays an egg they row back and say "nobody is saying he is the answer." This week you have decried Deshaun Watson, Jameis Winston, Marcus Mariota and Carson Wentz in your frankly absurd campaign to prove Tyrod is better than Quarterbacks who have been drafted by teams who got off the pot and took a shot high in the draft. Today you try and row back and accept he could be as low as 20th best in the league. I think Tyrod was bad today but it doesn't change my view from yesterday, last week or last month and I don't think he was the main reason we lost the game. None of those QBs have proven anything. They've had games as bad or worse than Tyrod's today. That's all I've said, that he isn't any worse than most guys in the NFL. And that's still true. I said last week he is somewhere between 11th and 20th and I stand by it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GunnerBill Posted October 8, 2017 Share Posted October 8, 2017 (edited) The answer is not to put Peterman in. It is to ring round your college scouts this week and tell them to cancel visits to watch anyone that isn't a potential franchise Quarterback who could declare in 2018. If I have to have 5 guys watch the Rosen one and 4 guys watch Mason Rudolph next week I will do it. Time for the Bills to get off the pot. Edited October 8, 2017 by GunnerBill Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marty McFly Posted October 8, 2017 Share Posted October 8, 2017 It doesn't have to be one or the other. You can believe our lack of weapons was a major cause of the loss and still believe Tyrod was bad (which he was). The offense as a whole was bad but when you only put it on the QB and claim we only need talent at QB then ur pushing an agenda. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo Barbarian Posted October 8, 2017 Share Posted October 8, 2017 Same as usual Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MarlinTheMagician Posted October 8, 2017 Author Share Posted October 8, 2017 Ours is a team that really can't take injuries. Won't be the case next year if they continue to improve the roster at the pace they have. So glad Darby is gone. Glad we are not tying money up in Sammy. Glad we have six picks. If TT had a deeper roster, you could make a deep playoff run with him. Would I rather have Mariotta or the equivalent? Yup, Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
transplantbillsfan Posted October 8, 2017 Share Posted October 8, 2017 On the surface it just looked baaaad. But at the same time, our WR corps is the worst in the NFL and Taylor lost his only reliable weapon on offense other than McCoy. At least a couple of the sacks he took were just coverage sacks because our crappy WRs couldn't get open. Some bad playcalling and some bad passes by Taylor and this was a game the Bengals were literally trying to give to us and we just couldn't take it. Oh well, I doubt anyone would have said they'd be upset with 3-2 at the bye, but the team has some work to do in the next couple weeks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
auburnbillsbacker Posted October 8, 2017 Share Posted October 8, 2017 I was fine with tanking thus season. Now that I see how competitive this team is I wish we had 2 WRs who can play. Tyrod is good enough with or defense if we had more offensive weapons. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GunnerBill Posted October 8, 2017 Share Posted October 8, 2017 (edited) The offense as a whole was bad but when you only put it on the QB and claim we only need talent at QB then ur pushing an agenda. I didn't do that and more to the point I haven't seen anyone here say we only need talent at QB. Edited October 8, 2017 by GunnerBill Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marty McFly Posted October 8, 2017 Share Posted October 8, 2017 I didn't do that. I know. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bills Pimpin' Posted October 8, 2017 Share Posted October 8, 2017 On the surface it just looked baaaad. But at the same time, our WR corps is the worst in the NFL and Taylor lost his only reliable weapon on offense other than McCoy. At least a couple of the sacks he took were just coverage sacks because our crappy WRs couldn't get open. Some bad playcalling and some bad passes by Taylor and this was a game the Bengals were literally trying to give to us and we just couldn't take it. Oh well, I doubt anyone would have said they'd be upset with 3-2 at the bye, but the team has some work to do in the next couple weeks. I agree with all of this but I can't help to think this game is won with just slightly above average QB play. 1 or 2 good plays was all that was needed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MarlinTheMagician Posted October 8, 2017 Author Share Posted October 8, 2017 Team is really good though. We are scary thin, but really folks - we have to love this team. Can't afford injuries. Maybe we need to upgrade QB next year (I trust these guys to know), but they play their guts out every weak and generally are not stupid. Today felt different too - we could have won, they made the big mistakes. We did not have enough today, but I don't think a player in that locker will be down on the teams chances in the second half. Get healthy, make the playoffs. Clearly won't win the SB this year, but I like trying to build a winning mentality much more than tanking. Next year, who knows! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BringBackOrton Posted October 8, 2017 Share Posted October 8, 2017 On the surface it just looked baaaad. But at the same time, our WR corps is the worst in the NFL and Taylor lost his only reliable weapon on offense other than McCoy. At least a couple of the sacks he took were just coverage sacks because our crappy WRs couldn't get open. Some bad playcalling and some bad passes by Taylor and this was a game the Bengals were literally trying to give to us and we just couldn't take it. Oh well, I doubt anyone would have said they'd be upset with 3-2 at the bye, but the team has some work to do in the next couple weeks. 3-2 at the bye has .500 written all over it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marty McFly Posted October 8, 2017 Share Posted October 8, 2017 3-2 at the bye has .500 written all over it. 8 wins is 3 more than most predicted during pre season including you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BringBackOrton Posted October 8, 2017 Share Posted October 8, 2017 8 wins is 3 more than most predicted during pre season including you. What record did I predict? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marty McFly Posted October 8, 2017 Share Posted October 8, 2017 What record did I predict? It was your post you should know dick face. Jus admit were gonna win more than you thought. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BringBackOrton Posted October 8, 2017 Share Posted October 8, 2017 It was your post you should know dick face. Jus admit were gonna win more than you thought. It sounds like you know. Tell me. I don't think I predicted less than 3 wins. Lots of season left. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marty McFly Posted October 8, 2017 Share Posted October 8, 2017 It sounds like you know. Tell me. I don't think I predicted less than 3 wins. Lots of season left. :lol: Thats what i thought. Dont be one of those posters. Were better than you thought. The sky is not falling. We can still hit a wc. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts