B-Man Posted September 18, 2017 Share Posted September 18, 2017 (edited) GENDER NEUTRAL BATHROOMS CAN’T WIN THE POPULAR VOTE AT COLUMBIA: Columbia University students recently voted against a proposal that would make all restrooms on a dorm-floor “gender inclusive.” Students living in at least five of the elite school’s residence halls voted floor-by-floor to determine whether their male- and female-designed restrooms would be made “gender inclusive,” a practice made possible under a new Columbia University Residence Life Policy. . . . Krish Bhatt, president of the Columbia Queer Alliance, slammed the new policy as one that privileges the voices of “cisgender” students. “The voices of cisgender residents, who likely outnumber transgender or gender nonconforming students and are more or less unimpacted by the decision, are being centered [in this decision],” Bhatt told The Spectator, adding that trans-students are not properly represented under such a “democratic fallacy.” “While I understand the intention of this decision…this rule reinforces a democratic fallacy, where those who would benefit from a decision to designate bathrooms as gender-inclusive are not necessarily represented or represented to the extent of their need,” Bhatt elaborated. If only you could weight votes somehow, in some sort of college-electoral thing or something. The name’s on the tip of my tongue. . . . Other points: (1) “Likely outnumber.” Delusional. (2) In fact, even on “liberal” campuses, most students don’t support this, they’re just bullied into keeping quiet. Forcing these decisions to secret-ballot votes is a good idea. https://pjmedia.com/instapundit/275874/ Edited September 18, 2017 by B-Man Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Koko78 Posted September 18, 2017 Share Posted September 18, 2017 GENDER NEUTRAL BATHROOMS CAN’T WIN THE POPULAR VOTE AT COLUMBIA: Columbia University students recently voted against a proposal that would make all restrooms on a dorm-floor “gender inclusive.” Students living in at least five of the elite school’s residence halls voted floor-by-floor to determine whether their male- and female-designed restrooms would be made “gender inclusive,” a practice made possible under a new Columbia University Residence Life Policy. . . . Krish Bhatt, president of the Columbia Queer Alliance, slammed the new policy as one that privileges the voices of “cisgender” students. “The voices of cisgender residents, who likely outnumber transgender or gender nonconforming students and are more or less unimpacted by the decision, are being centered [in this decision],” Bhatt told The Spectator, adding that trans-students are not properly represented under such a “democratic fallacy.” “While I understand the intention of this decision…this rule reinforces a democratic fallacy, where those who would benefit from a decision to designate bathrooms as gender-inclusive are not necessarily represented or represented to the extent of their need,” Bhatt elaborated. If only you could weight votes somehow, in some sort of college-electoral thing or something. The name’s on the tip of my tongue. . . . Other points: (1) “Likely outnumber.” Delusional. (2) In fact, even on “liberal” campuses, most students don’t support this, they’re just bullied into keeping quiet. Forcing these decisions to secret-ballot votes is a good idea. https://pjmedia.com/instapundit/275874/ Cisgender (whatever the !@#$ that means) being so underrepresented in the student body means that their votes need to count at least 4 times more than the evil commienaziterrorist 'normies' that pollute the residency dorms. That's the only way for there to be a fair vote for equality! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kelly the Dog Posted September 27, 2017 Share Posted September 27, 2017 So apparently, there is real voter fraud... https://twitter.com/axios/status/913153508764999682 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted September 27, 2017 Share Posted September 27, 2017 So apparently, there is real voter fraud... https://twitter.com/axios/status/913153508764999682 Sure...NOW the left has a problem with a man self-identifying as female. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kelly the Dog Posted September 28, 2017 Share Posted September 28, 2017 Sure...NOW the left has a problem with a man self-identifying as female. You can only claim you are a woman in a dress or butch cut. Neither for Kushy. Thems are the rules. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ExiledInIllinois Posted September 28, 2017 Share Posted September 28, 2017 (edited) Lots of snow birders have apartments in Brooklyn and a condo in Florida. I'd love to have those records examined. Lots of Illinois republicans have vacation homes in Michigan and Wisconsin. Can't win in Illinois, vote in Michigan and Wisconsin. Oops. I know someone who voted in Michigan, a republican... AND Illinois. I also would mail absentee ballots back to other states. The deckhands on the barges would give them to me to mail. One deckhand was voting for his father. Should I have ripped it up? I didn't. I snapped a picture of it being mailed... So I could show him. Edited September 28, 2017 by ExiledInIllinois Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted September 29, 2017 Share Posted September 29, 2017 OOPS................. White House adviser Jared Kushner did not register to vote in his hometown New York City as a female, contrary to breathless reporting on the subject this week. The idea that Kushner, the son-in-law of President Trump, registered as a woman first came from American Bridge, a Democratic opposition research group founded by activist David Brock. Citing information provided by American Bridge, the magazine Wired reported on Wednesday that Kushner registered to vote in 2009 as a female. The story gained traction because Kushner has been involved in a series of paperwork mixups during his short tenure in the White House Original Article Fake news, created by the Left and spread by a willing media ??? who'd a thunk it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IDBillzFan Posted September 29, 2017 Share Posted September 29, 2017 (edited) OOPS................. White House adviser Jared Kushner did not register to vote in his hometown New York City as a female, contrary to breathless reporting on the subject this week. The idea that Kushner, the son-in-law of President Trump, registered as a woman first came from American Bridge, a Democratic opposition research group founded by activist David Brock. Citing information provided by American Bridge, the magazine Wired reported on Wednesday that Kushner registered to vote in 2009 as a female. The story gained traction because Kushner has been involved in a series of paperwork mixups during his short tenure in the White House Original Article Fake news, created by the Left and spread by a willing media ??? who'd a thunk it Wait. What? The left took a fake story and ran with it as true? Well, I'm sure they'll all back pedal to correct themselves. Edited September 29, 2017 by LABillzFan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted October 12, 2017 Share Posted October 12, 2017 Meet Kassiah Kamara. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SlimShady'sSpaceForce Posted October 13, 2017 Share Posted October 13, 2017 Fake News? Trump 'Voter Fraud' Commission Violates Federal Law, Lawsuit ClaimsPresident Donald Trump’s controversial “election integrity” commission is facing yet another legal challenge with a privacy-rights group saying the panel is breaking federal law by gathering massive amounts of information on the nation’s registered voters. https://www.yahoo.com/news/trump-apos-voter-fraud-apos-224325062.html?.tsrc=jtc_news_index Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted October 13, 2017 Share Posted October 13, 2017 Fake News? Trump 'Voter Fraud' Commission Violates Federal Law, Lawsuit ClaimsPresident Donald Trump’s controversial “election integrity” commission is facing yet another legal challenge with a privacy-rights group saying the panel is breaking federal law by gathering massive amounts of information on the nation’s registered voters. https://www.yahoo.com/news/trump-apos-voter-fraud-apos-224325062.html?.tsrc=jtc_news_index And where are they getting the data from? State governments. Unless they're suing the states as well, it's a disingenuous lawsuit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted October 13, 2017 Share Posted October 13, 2017 Fake News? Trump 'Voter Fraud' Commission Violates Federal Law, Lawsuit ClaimsPresident Donald Trump’s controversial “election integrity” commission is facing yet another legal challenge with a privacy-rights group saying the panel is breaking federal law by gathering massive amounts of information on the nation’s registered voters. https://www.yahoo.com/news/trump-apos-voter-fraud-apos-224325062.html?.tsrc=jtc_news_index No. It's certainly not fake news. There are multiple attempts by the powers that be to keep the current system from being cleaned up in any way. As Tom pointed out, this is one of the weaker ones. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
grinreaper Posted October 13, 2017 Share Posted October 13, 2017 Fake News? Trump 'Voter Fraud' Commission Violates Federal Law, Lawsuit ClaimsPresident Donald Trump’s controversial “election integrity” commission is facing yet another legal challenge with a privacy-rights group saying the panel is breaking federal law by gathering massive amounts of information on the nation’s registered voters. https://www.yahoo.com/news/trump-apos-voter-fraud-apos-224325062.html?.tsrc=jtc_news_index In other words, you side with corruption and illegal activity purely for partisan reasons. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SlimShady'sSpaceForce Posted October 13, 2017 Share Posted October 13, 2017 In other words, you side with corruption and illegal activity purely for partisan reasons. Why are you such an ass all the time? Is Dearest Donny you relative? For sake lighten up Francis and don't take **** personal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
grinreaper Posted October 13, 2017 Share Posted October 13, 2017 Why are you such an ass all the time? Is Dearest Donny you relative? For sake lighten up Francis and don't take **** personal. You can't handle the truth! Respond in a non obtuse manner once in a while and maybe you'll get more sugar coated responses for your sensitive psyche. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted December 3, 2017 Author Share Posted December 3, 2017 https://www.washingtonpost.com/outlook/im-on-trumps-voter-fraud-commission-im-suing-it-to-find-out-what-its-doing/2017/11/30/1034574c-d3b0-11e7-95bf-df7c19270879_story.html?hpid=hp_no-name_opinion-card-b%3Ahomepage%2Fstory&utm_term=.3f211f5e448f On Nov. 9, I filed a complaint in U.S. District Court in Washington, seeking to obtain the working documents, correspondence and schedule of the Presidential Advisory Commission on Election Integrity. What’s remarkable about my lawsuit is that I’m a member of the commission, and apparently this is the only way I can find out what we’re doing. The commission was formed in May to answer monster-under-the-bed questions about “voter fraud,” but the implicit rationale for its creation appears to be to substantiate President Trump’s unfounded claims that up to 5 million people voted illegally in 2016. Chaired by Vice President Pence, the commission has the chance to answer questions about potential fraud and to highlight best practices to enhance voter confidence in our election systems. Yet it isn’t doing that. Instead, the commission is cloaking itself in secrecy, completely contrary to federal law. Recommendations for changes in public policy — whether you agree with them or not — ought to come through an open, public discussion where any American can weigh in. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted January 4, 2018 Author Share Posted January 4, 2018 It started with a big lie in which he said he got more votes than he actually did and scapegoated immigrants by saying they flooded the polls. Just lies, smears and hate. Now its dead. Spit Quote President Donald Trump is disbanding his voter fraud commission, known as the Presidential Advisory Commission on Election Integrity, citing states’ lack of cooperation with the investigation. “Despite substantial evidence of voter fraud, many states have refused to provide the Presidential Advisory Commission on Election Integrity with basic information relevant to its inquiry,” the president said in a statement. “Rather than engage in endless legal battles at taxpayer expense, today I signed an executive order to dissolve the Commission, and have asked the Department of Homeland Security to review these issues and determine next courses of action.” After Hillary Clinton won the popular vote in 2016, Trump claimed without evidence that there was widespread voter fraud. READ IT AT POLITICO Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KW95 - JA17 Posted January 4, 2018 Share Posted January 4, 2018 1 hour ago, Tiberius said: It started with a big lie in which he said he got more votes than he actually did and scapegoated immigrants by saying they flooded the polls. Just lies, smears and hate. Now its dead. Spit Add another one to the list of losing...although he will somehow spin it as winning. He has a huge button with huge hands! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted January 4, 2018 Share Posted January 4, 2018 Libs and lefties, it's all about PERCEPTION.... get that into your heads Teddy and Franklin Roosevelt, JFK, Reagan... the great deliverers of perception.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted January 4, 2018 Share Posted January 4, 2018 1 hour ago, KW95 said: Add another one to the list of losing...although he will somehow spin it as winning. He has a huge button with huge hands! You seem to be obsessed with Trump's hands. Is there something else you are trying to say? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts