Jump to content

Obama Performed Espionage on Trump prior to election


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 508
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

The evidence Trump was wiretapped laid out clearly by Mark Levin (Video)

by Thomas Lifson

 

Original Article

 

 

 

What is it like in this world that you and DT live in? I mean - is it different? It must be frustrating for you guys to be constantly fighting against the broad conspiracies that exist - to fight the good fight for the truth that seems to evade so much of the world....keep up the good work!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What is it like in this world that you and DT live in? I mean - is it different? It must be frustrating for you guys to be constantly fighting against the broad conspiracies that exist - to fight the good fight for the truth that seems to evade so much of the world....keep up the good work!

She lost dude. Show some respect to the President

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Obama admin gleefully tapped European leaders, it was a big deal when Germany made a squawk about it a few years ago.

 

And proudly and openly interfered in the Israeli election, to no avail.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Diesel-USMC

The Obama admin gleefully tapped European leaders, it was a big deal when Germany made a squawk about it a few years ago.

 

And proudly and openly interfered in the Israeli election, to no avail.

 

Shhhhhhhhhhh. One should not question such a magical administration.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Obama admin gleefully tapped European leaders, it was a big deal when Germany made a squawk about it a few years ago.

 

And it shouldn't have been, since foreign espionage is what the intelligence communities are for. Of course, it didn't stop the administration from denying it, to protect their snow-white image as infallible little angels.

 

Doesn't that sound familiar? Wonder when they're going to blame this wiretap on a YouTube video...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

And it shouldn't have been, since foreign espionage is what the intelligence communities are for. Of course, it didn't stop the administration from denying it, to protect their snow-white image as infallible little angels.

 

Doesn't that sound familiar? Wonder when they're going to blame this wiretap on a YouTube video...

What wire tap? D Bag

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

What is it like in this world that you and DT live in? I mean - is it different?

 

Basky, I will keep posting articles that I am sure most people have not seen.

 

You desire to spin that as you will......it simply does not matter.

 

However, one would hope that you (occasionally) will peek out of the shell that you obviously live in, and try reading something that challenges your bias.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What wire tap? D Bag

 

The one for which the FISA warrant was received back in October, which was reported in January.

 

Again: Trump did nothing but tweet an old news story. It was reported by the same people now reporting it never happened.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Diesel-USMC

 

 

What is it like in this world that you and DT live in? I mean - is it different? It must be frustrating for you guys to be constantly fighting against the broad conspiracies that exist - to fight the good fight for the truth that seems to evade so much of the world....keep up the good work!

So, questioning narratives that are being delivered by questionable people with questionable pasts who have routinely been at the forefront of scandals and such is absolutely wrong.

 

But, it's fine and good to hitch yourself to the wagon that those people, who couldn't unite over issues for the betterment of our country but find it convenient to unite against one man whose general concepts of enforcing laws and removing the elements of government that have made it difficult for the majority to function within constitutional boundaries, they find vulgar.....well, that's just asinine.

 

Trump doesn't have the tactful delivery we are used to. He doesn't walk softly over the egg shells that small portions of society have spread over the grass. He certainly isn't perfect but, he's more truthful than people like. That's the problem. People have spent so much time and energy distorting truth for the sake of feelings, that they cannot bring themselves to accept truth because of those feelings.

That is the only thing I will give anyone who is against what he is trying to do.

 

The media, for the most part, deliver to you and the rest of those who will absorb, an idea that what he is doing is someohow outside the realm of law and order. When in fact, it's quite the opposite. If you really have to question the integrity of intellect by people who have decided to take it upon themselves to connect the dots and not rely on FOX, CNN or the New York Times to connect them and deliver the final picture, that's a real issue. Not for those of us who refuse to listen to a bunch of crap and accept it as reality, but decided to connect our own dots to form an opinion, but for those who decide they're better off just accepting what considered acceptable.

 

The fun thing about many "conspiracy theories" is, much of them often end up being more true than the falsified reality prepackaged for absorption. I'm not saying the end conclusion of the "conspiracy" is true but the guts of it is often based on accurate information. It's up to you to separate the bull from the truth. Many people find it difficult to do that because of the vast amounts of misinformation available today and find it easier to roll with the flow. That's the real problem and the people looking to mislead have understood that concept about society today and they've mastered the art of doing it. They use human emotion to cloud reality and it works.

 

One example are those commercials for starving children around the world. You mean to tell me that we can't make a dent after all these years? Instead of looking at the corruption preventing the growth of these cultures, we just paint a picture to get people emotionally invested in the cause and they'll donate without skepticism.

 

Another is the idea that all of the rich took from the poor. If the poor had nothing, how can 10 nothing's equal something? It doesn't. Instead of trying to remove the elements that prevent the growth of individuals and allowing individuals to control their own future, the government places them into a bubble and that bubble only gets as big as the program allows but, on the outside, it's painted as an emotional hinge that the door of a society will swing on......

 

I don't believe everything presented to me. However, I know that 2+2 is always 4. If you try to tell me otherwise, I will not accept it. It's a simple concept and not one that should be looked at making someone "crazy".

Edited by Diesel-USMC
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

The one for which the FISA warrant was received back in October, which was reported in January.

 

Again: Trump did nothing but tweet an old news story. It was reported by the same people now reporting it never happened.

Obama did that?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Diesel-USMC

You better give Pastajoe his book back.

I know that people feel entitled to what others have but, I'm certain the publisher of the book printed more than one copy and if they'd take the time to look for it, they may find it much easier to purchase their own copy and forgo complaining that they don't have one or that I have seemingly "stolen" theirs.

 

;)

Edited by Diesel-USMC
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Obama did that?

 

Oh, now we're going to play the rhetorical game where the President isn't responsible for anything else the executive branch does? I'll remember that the next time you blame something on Trump personally that he personally had nothing to do with.

So, questioning narratives that are being delivered by questionable people with questionable pasts who have routinely been at the forefront of scandals and such is absolutely wrong.

 

But, it's fine and good to hitch yourself to the wagon that those people, who couldn't unite over issues for the betterment of our country but find it convenient to unite against one man whose general concepts of enforcing laws and removing the elements of government that have made it difficult for the majority to function within constitutional boundaries, they find vulgar.....well, that's just asinine.

 

Trump doesn't have the tactful delivery we are used to. He doesn't walk softly over the egg shells that small portions of society have spread over the grass. He certainly isn't perfect but, he's more truthful than people like. That's the problem. People have spent so much time and energy distorting truth for the sake of feelings, that they cannot bring themselves to accept truth because of those feelings.

That is the only thing I will give anyone who is against what he is trying to do.

 

The media, for the most part, deliver to you and the rest of those who will absorb, an idea that what he is doing is someohow outside the realm of law and order. When in fact, it's quite the opposite. If you really have to question the integrity of intellect by people who have decided to take it upon themselves to connect the dots and not rely on FOX, CNN or the New York Times to connect them and deliver the final picture, that's a real issue. Not for those of us who refuse to listen to a bunch of crap and accept it as reality, but decided to connect our own dots to form an opinion, but for those who decide they're better off just accepting what considered acceptable.

 

The fun thing about many "conspiracy theories" is, much of them often end up being more true than the falsified reality prepackaged for absorption. I'm not saying the end conclusion of the "conspiracy" is true but the guts of it is often based on accurate information. It's up to you to separate the bull from the truth. Many people find it difficult to do that because of the vast amounts of misinformation available today and find it easier to roll with the flow. That's the real problem and the people looking to mislead have understood that concept about society today and they've mastered the art of doing it. They use human emotion to cloud reality and it works.

 

One example are those commercials for starving children around the world. You mean to tell me that we can't make a dent after all these years? Instead of looking at the corruption preventing the growth of these cultures, we just paint a picture to get people emotionally invested in the cause and they'll donate without skepticism.

 

Another is the idea that all of the rich took from the poor. If the poor had nothing, how can 10 nothing's equal something? It doesn't. Instead of trying to remove the elements that prevent the growth of individuals and allowing individuals to control their own future, the government places them into a bubble and that bubble only gets as big as the program allows but, on the outside, it's painted as an emotional hinge that the door of a society will swing on......

 

I don't believe everything presented to me. However, I know that 2+2 is always 4. If you try to tell me otherwise, I will not accept it. It's a simple concept and not one that should be looked at making someone "crazy".

 

I can think of multiple examples where 2+2 is not 4.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So, questioning narratives that are being delivered by questionable people with questionable pasts who have routinely been at the forefront of scandals and such is absolutely wrong.

 

You're chopping the wrong tree. baskin is one of those "I used to be a Rebublican until the party left me so now I'm a Socialist Progressive who believes only the government has the answer for everything. Oh, and IKEA!!!"

 

He'll ask you questions like "Where is the GOP plan?" and then when you provide him links to whatever plan his questioning, he comes back to yell, "That's no plan!" until he disappears for a week or so, and then returns and yells something like "Every industrialized country provides 'free' health care to its people and typically at half what it costs Americans," but then when you ask for more details, he runs away for another week before he returns to yell "Where's the GOP plan?"

 

He's like Harry Reid, except he has two eyes and no one has accused baskin of diddlin' around with little boys.

Edited by LABillzFan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Diesel-USMC

Oh, now we're going to play the rhetorical game where the President isn't responsible for anything else the executive branch does? I'll remember that the next time you blame something on Trump personally that he personally had nothing to do with.

 

I can think of multiple examples where 2+2 is not 4.

I suppose I may regret asking when and how. But, before you begin, if I have 2 oranges and I buy two more, then I will have 4 oranges that belong to me. It was meant as a loose metaphor.

You're chopping the wrong tree. baskin is one of those "I used to be a Rebublican until the party left me so now I'm a Socialist Progressive who believes only the government has the answer for everything. Oh, and IKEA!!!"

 

He'll ask you questions like "Where is the GOP plan?" and then when you provide him links to whatever plan his questioning, he comes back to yell, "That's no plan!" until he disappears for a week or so, and then returns and yells something like "Every industrialized country provides 'free' health care to its people and typically at half what it costs Americans," but then when you ask for more details, he runs away for another week before he returns to yell "Where's the GOP plan?"

 

He's like Harry Reid, except he has two eyes and no one has accused baskin of diddlin' around with little boys.

 

I see. Well, I guess I'll mark that particular tree with an "X" and allow the machine to do the chopping for me. Not worth the time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Oh, now we're going to play the rhetorical game where the President isn't responsible for anything else the executive branch does? I'll remember that the next time you blame something on Trump personally that he personally had nothing to do with.

 

He accused Obama of tapping his phone not the justice department or anything. That was the question right from the beginning right out of Trump's twitter. Trump never said "Hey, i was investigated for connections to Russia."

So, questioning narratives that are being delivered by questionable people with questionable pasts who have routinely been at the forefront of scandals and such is absolutely wrong.

 

But, it's fine and good to hitch yourself to the wagon that those people, who couldn't unite over issues for the betterment of our country but find it convenient to unite against one man whose general concepts of enforcing laws and removing the elements of government that have made it difficult for the majority to function within constitutional boundaries, they find vulgar.....well, that's just asinine.

 

Trump doesn't have the tactful delivery we are used to. He doesn't walk softly over the egg shells that small portions of society have spread over the grass. He certainly isn't perfect but, he's more truthful than people like. That's the problem. People have spent so much time and energy distorting truth for the sake of feelings, that they cannot bring themselves to accept truth because of those feelings.

That is the only thing I will give anyone who is against what he is trying to do.

 

The media, for the most part, deliver to you and the rest of those who will absorb, an idea that what he is doing is someohow outside the realm of law and order. When in fact, it's quite the opposite. If you really have to question the integrity of intellect by people who have decided to take it upon themselves to connect the dots and not rely on FOX, CNN or the New York Times to connect them and deliver the final picture, that's a real issue. Not for those of us who refuse to listen to a bunch of crap and accept it as reality, but decided to connect our own dots to form an opinion, but for those who decide they're better off just accepting what considered acceptable.

 

The fun thing about many "conspiracy theories" is, much of them often end up being more true than the falsified reality prepackaged for absorption. I'm not saying the end conclusion of the "conspiracy" is true but the guts of it is often based on accurate information. It's up to you to separate the bull from the truth. Many people find it difficult to do that because of the vast amounts of misinformation available today and find it easier to roll with the flow. That's the real problem and the people looking to mislead have understood that concept about society today and they've mastered the art of doing it. They use human emotion to cloud reality and it works.

 

One example are those commercials for starving children around the world. You mean to tell me that we can't make a dent after all these years? Instead of looking at the corruption preventing the growth of these cultures, we just paint a picture to get people emotionally invested in the cause and they'll donate without skepticism.

 

Another is the idea that all of the rich took from the poor. If the poor had nothing, how can 10 nothing's equal something? It doesn't. Instead of trying to remove the elements that prevent the growth of individuals and allowing individuals to control their own future, the government places them into a bubble and that bubble only gets as big as the program allows but, on the outside, it's painted as an emotional hinge that the door of a society will swing on......

 

I don't believe everything presented to me. However, I know that 2+2 is always 4. If you try to tell me otherwise, I will not accept it. It's a simple concept and not one that should be looked at making someone "crazy".

Rhino?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...