Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
Just now, Jauronimo said:

Clearly the smart answer from law enforcement is more of the same.  Winning back the public trust one flashbang at a time.  CS gas isn't permissible under the Geneva Convention but if the police manual says you should dispense it like Pez if you doubt they have a permit then it must be the right thing to do.  

 

There was nothing violent in what the police did. They slowly and systematically moved the crowd away from the area they wanted them moved. 

 

Don't really see much outrage from you over the 8 police officers who have been shot over the last few days.

 

The public showing they can be trusted by shooting one officer at a time?

Posted

 

 

YOU CAN’T CALL THEM LOOTERS WHEN THEY LOOT, BECAUSE TRUMP USES THAT WORD AND HE’S THE ENEMY.

 

THAT’S HOW #JOURNALISM WORKS:

 

 

Screen-Shot-2020-06-02-at-9.50.45-AM.png

 

 

So just because they’re looting, you can’t call them “looters.” You say “some protesters broke into the store and stole whatever was on the shelves.”

 

Weird, you’d think it would be people opposed to the protests who’d want to blur the line between peaceful protesters and violent looters.

 

But then, we’ll have the press defending church-burning before this is all over.

 
 
 
 
  • Haha (+1) 3
Posted
1 hour ago, Tiberius said:

Bolsheviks did not believe in voting rights, Democrats are fighting hard to expand democracy. It's really coming down to you either support Trump, or you support democracy. 

 

Trump now threatening martial laws as he tries to enflame the situation. 

These particular Bolsheviks believe in voting rights. Until the get power. Then. to protect the workers and the general good, they will take that away. 

The situation has already been inflamed. By said Bolsheviks. The line has been crossed from protesting to war. They are harming innocent citizens and private property. The Bolsheviks do not have the right to do that. No matter how principled they believe they are. I am weary of the police state as anyone but good citizens are dying at the hands of psychopaths. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
15 minutes ago, Jauronimo said:

CS gas isn't permissible under the Geneva Convention

 

 

:lol:

 

What?

 

Perhaps a bit more research next time. It's banned in warfare (though EVERY person who enlists in the Army at least is exposed to it repeatedly), but there is NO restriction on using it to disperse civilian mobs.

 

Good God man. Clutch pearls much?

 

Posted

If you are more focused on tear gas being applied on the protesters more so than the 4 police officers who were shot in St Louis, Police officer shot in the head and died in Las Vegas, the police officer who was ambushed and shot in Iowa, the national guard members who were ran over in Buffalo NY, the police officer who was ran over in NYC, the multiple NY officers who were gang beat up by rioters and the countless stores that were destroyed, then I don't know what to tell you, other than your priorities are all out of wack.

  • Like (+1) 5
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 5
Posted
1 minute ago, billsfan1959 said:

 

There was nothing violent in what the police did. They slowly and systematically moved the crowd away from the area they wanted them moved. 

 

Don't really see much outrage from you over the 8 police officers who have been shot over the last few days.

 

The public showing they can be trusted by shooting one officer at a time?

The public doesn't work for the police.   

 

Just now, Joe in Winslow said:

 

:lol:

 

What?

 

Perhaps a bit more research next time. It's banned in warfare (though EVERY person who enlists in the Army at least is exposed to it repeatedly), but there is NO restriction on using it to disperse civilian mobs.

 

Good God man. Clutch pearls much?

 

My research is fine.  Your reading comprehension could improve.

 

So impermissible in warfare but appropriate for our citizens???  Nothing to see here.  Law enforcement is once again above any reproach.

Posted
19 minutes ago, Jauronimo said:

Clearly the smart answer from law enforcement is more of the same.  Winning back the public trust one flashbang at a time.  CS gas isn't permissible under the Geneva Convention but if the police manual says you should dispense it like Pez if you doubt they have a permit then it must be the right thing to do.  

 

 

 

Lol. I doubt they had a permit. I’m sure the DC Metro Police knew whether they did or not. Maybe read up on law, case law, and use of force? It’s not just the “police manual” that allows it. 
 

BTW - you crack me up on the main board. 

Posted
Just now, Magox said:

If you are more focused on tear gas being applied on the protesters more so than the 4 police officers who were shot in St Louis, Police officer shot in the head and died in Las Vegas, the police officer who was ambushed and shot in Iowa, the national guard members who were ran over in Buffalo NY, the police officer who was ran over in NYC, the multiple NY officers who were gang beat up by rioters and the countless stores that were destroyed, then I don't know what to tell you, other than your priorities are all out of wack.

I'm just as focused on McAtee, the civilians who were run over in NYC, the multiple protesters who were gang beat in the streets, pepper sprayed with minimal provocation.  

 

As a functional adult, I am capable of understanding that violence against the police is wrong while also understanding that looting is wrong and yet still having an issue with the number of instances of police brutality I am witnessing during protests about police brutality.  

Posted
17 minutes ago, BuffaloHokie13 said:

I'm not going to catch this fish for you, but perhaps you can learn. Read my post again, then read your response. Can you determine where you attributed intent to someone else's actions based on your personal interpretation? 

He obviously appealed to people's prejudices running for office. He didn't scapegoat immigrants for a non-existent crime wave for no reason. He scapegoated immigrants as criminals for a reason. To win votes 

Posted
3 minutes ago, Jauronimo said:

The public doesn't work for the police.   

My research is fine.  Your reading comprehension could improve.

So impermissible in warfare but appropriate for our citizens???  Nothing to see here.  Law enforcement is once again above any reproach.

 

No it doesn't. However, I find it interesting, but not surprising, that with all of the violent criminal behavior taking place, your indignation is over the police moving a peaceful crowd to a new location.

 

There isn't anyone here saying that LE Officers are above reproach. But hey, since you seem to have such a problem with them, why don't you step up to the front of the next riot and show Officers how it should be done....

Posted
10 minutes ago, Dante said:

These particular Bolsheviks believe in voting rights. Until the get power. Then. to protect the workers and the general good, they will take that away. 

The situation has already been inflamed. By said Bolsheviks. The line has been crossed from protesting to war. They are harming innocent citizens and private property. The Bolsheviks do not have the right to do that. No matter how principled they believe they are. I am weary of the police state as anyone but good citizens are dying at the hands of psychopaths. 

Why? No need to. Demographics are changing in Democrats favor very quickly. When Texas goes solidly Democratic you guys are going to have to change the GOP A LOT to win the presidency again. 

Posted
9 minutes ago, Jauronimo said:

So impermissible in warfare but appropriate for our citizens???  Nothing to see here.  Law enforcement is once again above any reproach.

 

EVERY police force on this planet uses it.

 

All of them.

 

But yes, above reproach.


WON'T SOMEONE THINK OF THE CHILDREN?!?!

 

 

Posted

“‘Instead of standing there and teaching a cop when there’s an unarmed person coming at ‘em with a knife or something, shoot ‘em in the leg instead of in the heart,’ Biden said in an address to black community leaders in Wilmington, Del.”

 

 People are actually gonna vote for this imbecile? This is one of the most ignorant, moronic statements I’ve heard. And, it’s from a “presidential candidate”. 
 

 

 

  • Like (+1) 5
Posted
1 minute ago, Jauronimo said:

The public doesn't work for the police.   

 

My research is fine.  Your reading comprehension could improve.

 

So impermissible in warfare but appropriate for our citizens???  Nothing to see here.  Law enforcement is once again above any reproach.

The TBD Sandbox is lit this morning. Wanting antifa led rioting to stop is now considered racist. Despite the fact that antifa is terrorist organization mainly comprised of overeducated white socialists who can't get jobs with their worthless degrees so they cosplay as righteous vigilantes. Better to name everyone they disagree with fascists than to own their uselessness and silly white guilt.

 

Also, OrangeManBad is officially, definitely Hitler. ?

  • Like (+1) 4
  • Awesome! (+1) 3
Posted
Just now, Jauronimo said:

I'm just as focused on McAtee, the civilians who were run over in NYC, the multiple protesters who were gang beat in the streets, pepper sprayed with minimal provocation.  

 

As a functional adult, I am capable of understanding that violence against the police is wrong while also understanding that looting is wrong and yet still having an issue with the number of instances of police brutality I am witnessing during protests about police brutality.  

 

There is no equivalency between the two.  These protesters resisted.  They were warned three times to move back peacefully, and they declined.  So no, I don't share your view on this, at all.  And when you say "understanding that violence against the police is wrong", the mere fact that you are more outraged against people who resisted the police and got tear gassed (Gasp) over the true brutality against communities and law enforcement from these protesters, I think perfectly encapsulates the Orwellian society that we are living in today.

 

No outrage for law abiding citizens who have their small businesses, property and dreams torched, but outraged for police officers attempting to restore order.

 

It's disgusting.

  • Like (+1) 3
  • Thank you (+1) 5
Posted
1 minute ago, LB3 said:

The TBD Sandbox is lit this morning. Wanting antifa led rioting to stop is now considered racist. Despite the fact that antifa is terrorist organization mainly comprised of overeducated white socialists who can't get jobs with their worthless degrees so they cosplay as righteous vigilantes. Better to name everyone they disagree with fascists than to own their uselessness and silly white guilt.

 

Also, OrangeManBad is officially, definitely Hitler. ?

 

I'm guessing Jauronimo has never been exposed to CS gas.

 

If he had been, he'd know it's not some crime against humanity to use it.

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, Sig1Hunter said:

“‘Instead of standing there and teaching a cop when there’s an unarmed person coming at ‘em with a knife or something, shoot ‘em in the leg instead of in the heart,’ Biden said in an address to black community leaders in Wilmington, Del.”

 

 People are actually gonna vote for this imbecile? This is one of the most ignorant, moronic statements I’ve heard. And, it’s from a “presidential candidate”. 

 

What a moronic statement. The sad thing is that there are a large number of people that think this is a good idea....

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
13 minutes ago, Jauronimo said:

 

 

So impermissible in warfare but appropriate for our citizens???  Nothing to see here.  Law enforcement is once again above any reproach.

 

 

Warfare?  Did you just say warfare?

 

Ok, that's all I need to know with what sort of argument that I'm up against.

Posted
1 minute ago, billsfan1959 said:

 

No it doesn't. However, I find it interesting, but not surprising, that with all of the violent criminal behavior taking place, your indignation is over the police moving a peaceful crowd to a new location.

 

There isn't anyone here saying that LE Officers are above reproach. But hey, since you seem to have such a problem with them, why don't you step up to the front of the next riot and show Officers how it should be done....

Since when does condemning police brutality mean I support ANTIFA, looting, and violent acts against the police?  This is such a juvenile argument.  Whataboutism rather than respond to any substance of my point.  

 

 

×
×
  • Create New...