Jump to content

frustrating usage of sammy watkins


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 145
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Calm your Va JJ

 

The reason why were in a 6-5 right now and not in playoff position is because we continue to not feed Watkins enough. Hes our best player, he needs the ball more than hes gotten the last 3 games. We have a lot invested in him and we need to utilize that investment. 2 of the last 3 games we've lost and hes had only 30 yards receiving each time. When he gets the ball we win. Thats all im saying.

Good point when you look at the targets, and catches for the season

 

Chicago 4 targets, 3 rec, 31 yards

Miami 11 targets, 8 rec...117 yards 1 TD

San Diego 8 targets, 2 rec, 19 yards

Houston 9 targets, 4 rec, 30 yards

Detroit 12 targets, 7 rec, 87 yards

New England 3 targets, 2 rec, 27 yards...a decoy :doh:

Minnesota 14 targets, 9 rec, 122 yards, 2 TD's

NY Jets, 6 targets, 3 rec 157 yards

KC, 10 targets, 4 rec 27 yards. KC had the #1 pass defense in the league

Miami, 7 targets 3 rec 32 yards --one rushing attempt for 3 yards. Miami had the #2 pass defense in the league

NY Jets, 5 targets 3 rec 35 yards

 

As we can see the more Sammy is targeted the more he catches, and the better chance the Bills have to win.

 

On one hand Sammy is ranked 23rd in the NFL, and has more yards then Vincent Jackson & Jimmy Graham. On the other hand the Bills gave up 3 draft picks / 3 players for this kid, and they really should be force feeding him the ball every game to justify spending that many picks on any player. After 12 games Sammy isn't even ranked as the best rookie WR in this years draft, as that honor goes to #11 ranked Mike Evans. Evans has had 2 100 yard games and a 200 yard game. Next up after that is #18 Kelvin Benjamin with #37 Odell Beckham quickly catching up.

 

What we don't know is how many times the Bills OC calls for Sammy to be the primary target, and how many times Orton sees him covered and goes to another receiver. What I do know is that Sammy should be seeing at the very least 10 targets a game. From the looks of things the current OC has only tried once all season to put Watkins in a run the ball situation, and he could be seeing one to two looks in that aspect a game. End around's, reverses etc.

 

When you have such an explosive a weapon on offense, and the teams best offensive weapon. It just makes common sense to try and feed him the ball as much as you can. JMHO

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In the KC game forget the targets, as many as I remember were just throwaways. I see the alignments and it is almost always the same with Sammy on the outside and usually on the sidelines. I want to see him in the slot at times and hidden coming over the middle. I want to see him used more like Golden Tate.

 

Interesting how lousy Detroit's offense has looked the last two weeks vs. Arizona & NE and Stafford not looking to Golden Tate (most passes second half vs. NE were uncatchable) and with megatron back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My favorite play of the game was the WR screen to Gragg while Sammy blocks for him. If this isn't a OC outsmarting himself I don't know what is.

 

Then again, after watching Gragg blow the easy block that would have gotten Freddie into the endzone earlier in the game I suppose they did use the better of the two blockers.

 

All that being said overall it was a solid game plan by the Bills and while they certainly weren't perfect it's hard to fault much in a blow out win.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

here we are again. Another anemic putrid showing by the offense. Another game where Sammy is targeted under 10 times in a game.

 

 

Am I the only one here who understands that our offense plays our best when Sammy is playing his best?

 

I think after you target a guy 9 times, and only get 3 completions out of it, it's okay to not target him again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think after you target a guy 9 times, and only get 3 completions out of it, it's okay to not target him again.

 

Only half of those "targets" were even catchable balls. Once again, our offense failed to figure out ways to get him open in space. Once again, Orton missed Sammy wide open on a crossing out that set us up with 4th and short in the opponents territory.

 

This stuff keeps repeating itself for a reason. We are DEAD last in red zone TD % and our offense continues to fail at getting the ball in the hands of its best player.

 

Our defense is NOT going to be able to bail us out like this vs GB, NE or DEN

Edited by TallskiWallski83
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Only half of those "targets" were even catchable balls. Once again, our offense failed to figure out ways to get him open in space. Once again, Orton missed Sammy wide open on a crossing out that set us up with 4th and short in the opponents territory.

 

This stuff keeps repeating itself for a reason. We are DEAD last in red zone TD % and our offense continues to fail at getting the ball in the hands of its best player.

 

Our defense is NOT going to be able to bail us out like this vs GB, NE or DEN

 

Sure. But you're complaining about his usage, right? It's not like we're not trying to get him the ball, we just aren't succeeding.

Edited by FireChan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sure. But you're complaining about his usage, right? It's not like we're not trying to get him the ball, we just aren't succeeding.

 

were doing both depending on which game you look at. Either way its a failure of our offense and if we dont right the ship this week, we are going to be sad panda fans.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sure. But you're complaining about his usage, right? It's not like we're not trying to get him the ball, we just aren't succeeding.

 

Agreed. Yesterday it was a simple function of the QB being unable to hit an open WR. Short stuff, deep stuff, inside, outside; didn't matter. Orton was off the mark again, repeatedly.

 

Frustrating to watch really.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Agreed. Yesterday it was a simple function of the QB being unable to hit an open WR. Short stuff, deep stuff, inside, outside; didn't matter. Orton was off the mark again, repeatedly.

 

Frustrating to watch really.

 

Orton was terrible yesterday. And right on cue, the Hacket-sucks threads spread like wildfire! Incredible how that always happens.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

were doing both depending on which game you look at. Either way its a failure of our offense and if we dont right the ship this week, we are going to be sad panda fans.

 

Apparently, you were looking at this game though.

 

Another anemic putrid showing by the offense. Another game where Sammy is targeted under 10 times in a game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Agreed. Yesterday it was a simple function of the QB being unable to hit an open WR. Short stuff, deep stuff, inside, outside; didn't matter. Orton was off the mark again, repeatedly.

 

Frustrating to watch really.

 

I think when the A-22 comes out this week people are going to see that he was rarely open. That 2nd INT was entirely on Sammy -- he has to make that cut and fight Haden for the ball. After that play I can understand why they started targeting Woods more.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Orton was terrible yesterday. And right on cue, the Hacket-sucks threads spread like wildfire! Incredible how that always happens.

 

I do wonder how good Hackett might be if he had competent QB play...I have my doubts though. Situationally he's very hit-and-miss.

 

I think when the A-22 comes out this week people are going to see that he was rarely open. That 2nd INT was entirely on Sammy -- he has to make that cut and fight Haden for the ball. After that play I can understand why they started targeting Woods more.

 

That may be...being at the game it looked like there were more than a handful of times he was open. The problem with defining "open" is that it has a different meaning for different QBs. I say Sammy was open on the deep ball that Orton overthrew him on; others may say that's a tough throw for a guy like Orton (I believe an NFL QB needs to hit that throw). I did think that Haden beat Sammy to the INT; not sure if they were on the same page there, as that's typically a catch that Sammy fights for inside.

 

One thing that I haven't noticed anyone mentioning is that the Browns took two very smart defensive holding calls against Sammy. On both, he pulled nasty double-moves (one on Haden, one on Skrine) that would've had him running free in the secondary for a TD (provided that Orton didn't massively over or under throw him).

 

Smart penalties both times.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Orton predetermines where hes going with the ball prior to the snap the majority of the time and yesterday he couldnt hit the broad side of a barn with some of the throws he was making. Also, everytime we are in a 3rd and long situation and you know the blitz is coming orton either A. Chucks the ball out as fast as possible to a pre-determined WR or B. Gets sacked.

 

 

Its pathetic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That may be...being at the game it looked like there were more than a handful of times he was open. The problem with defining "open" is that it has a different meaning for different QBs. I say Sammy was open on the deep ball that Orton overthrew him on; others may say that's a tough throw for a guy like Orton (I believe an NFL QB needs to hit that throw). I did think that Haden beat Sammy to the INT; not sure if they were on the same page there, as that's typically a catch that Sammy fights for inside.

 

One thing that I haven't noticed anyone mentioning is that the Browns took two very smart defensive holding calls against Sammy. On both, he pulled nasty double-moves (one on Haden, one on Skrine) that would've had him running free in the secondary for a TD (provided that Orton didn't massively over or under throw him).

 

Certainly some plays where he was open and KO couldn't get him the ball, but I think there's far more where Haden completely snuffed him out and KO was forced to go to his 2nd or 3rd option. He's definitely playing hurt and doesn't have the same burst out of his breaks, he was riding the bike on the sidelines and looked lost.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

maybe if we stopped trying to justify the trade, we could judge his play more objectively. from that prospective he looks like a promising rookie receiver. unfortunately, we do need to consider his cost from the trade...

Refuting your own posts now? I guess your PPP therapy is working. Or failing. Not sure. Either way I think this is the first confirmed case of PPPTSD.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...