Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
6 minutes ago, SectionC3 said:

It's a reference to the Gospel of Matthew and Jesus's teaching of peace.  Apparently that's what you define as inane. 

It is unrelated to the statement that was presented, that is why it was insane. And Jesus was pointing out that those quick to violence will die by violence, not that having a sword is bad. The fact that you do not realize that is what is meant is astounding. 

  • Agree 1
Posted
9 hours ago, Orlando Buffalo said:

It is unrelated to the statement that was presented, that is why it was insane. And Jesus was pointing out that those quick to violence will die by violence, not that having a sword is bad. The fact that you do not realize that is what is meant is astounding. 

Initially you said it was inane, not insane.  Just pick one.  And save your prosperity/gun gospel theories for someone else.  Like that chicken I mentioned earlier.  

Posted
9 hours ago, SectionC3 said:

It's a reference to the Gospel of Matthew and Jesus's teaching of peace.  Apparently that's what you define as inane. 

Hoax

Posted
8 hours ago, SectionC3 said:

Initially you said it was inane, not insane.  Just pick one.  And save your prosperity/gun gospel theories for someone else.  Like that chicken I mentioned earlier.  

Inane autocorrects to insane- I do write insane quite often here- but inane is the word I wrote. I do love how you bring up the bible verse and then don't want to discuss/explain it since you obvious have no idea what the meaning of the verse was

Posted
1 hour ago, Orlando Buffalo said:

Inane autocorrects to insane- I do write insane quite often here- but inane is the word I wrote. I do love how you bring up the bible verse and then don't want to discuss/explain it since you obvious have no idea what the meaning of the verse was

Please.  Your interpretation of the subject verse is inconsistent with the teachings of Jesus.   Save your gun gospel and prosperity gospel theories for someone else.  

Posted
33 minutes ago, SectionC3 said:

Please.  Your interpretation of the subject verse is inconsistent with the teachings of Jesus.   Save your gun gospel and prosperity gospel theories for someone else.  

 

 

 

 

Posted
39 minutes ago, SectionC3 said:

Please.  Your interpretation of the subject verse is inconsistent with the teachings of Jesus.   Save your gun gospel and prosperity gospel theories for someone else.  

Please actually tell me what you believe Jesus was saying with that quote then- I promise I won't argue it I just want to see what you think it means. 

  • Thank you (+1) 1
  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

 

 

In the fight to restore order in the nation's capital, the Trump administration is now engaging another, proven founding principle of the republic:

The Second Amendment.

 

Specifically, the District of Columbia's concealed-carry permitting process time is being slashed, from months to days.

 

This is an unmitigated good thing, and actually is a fundamental liberty, not granted but protected by the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

 

The concealed carry permit process also has been streamlined, Fox Digital learned. What used to take "several months" to obtain a concealed carry permit, has been cut down to 4.6 days, according to data compiled during the month of May by the task force, which the White House shared with Fox News Digital.

 

Appointments for firearm registration and conceal carry licenses also have been combined into one category to cut back on confusion over which option to choose when beginning the gun process. While the District will soon use third-party finger printers, in addition to Metropolitan Police Department machines, after the D.C. City Council voted to broaden where people can get fingerprinted July 28.

 

 

For a Second Amendment purist (like me), it rankles that any jurisdiction, anywhere, is allowed to require a government permit to exercise a constitutional right. (Alaska doesn't.)

 

But this is the world we live in; politics is the art of the possible, and in the District of Columbia, this may well be the best we can hope for - today. And we should note that before the Supreme Court's decision in the New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc. v. Bruen case, we might not even have had that.

 

https://redstate.com/wardclark/2025/08/15/big-beautiful-self-defense-win-trump-streamlines-dc-concealed-carry-permitting-n2192849

Posted

 

 

CIVIL RIGHTS UPDATE: 

 

Federal District Court Rules NY’s Non-Resident Carry Ban Violates the Second Amendment. 

 

This ruling will, of course, be appealed.

 

The game, after all, is to delay, delay, delay.

 

Still, this is a very positive ruling and another brick knocked out of the gun control wall.”

 

https://www.shootingnewsweekly.com/gun-control/federal-district-court-rules-nys-non-resident-carry-ban-violates-the-second-amendment/

 

.

Posted (edited)

image.thumb.png.94668d5fcc5c3fba4dbf1f70e8e50f45.png

well, would ya look at that... another one of the alphabet rainbow strikes again.

 

clearly, it's not a mental health issue.

Edited by boyst
  • Angry 1
Posted
1 minute ago, AlBUNDY4TDS said:

This is definitely mental illness. Look what public schools have done to our kids.

 

 

Totally sad.

he's quoting russians, anti semetic, anti god, anti trump, against pdf's, dude was out there.

  • Agree 1
×
×
  • Create New...