Jump to content

What is better, no guns, or more guns?


Recommended Posts

21 minutes ago, Doc Brown said:

I don't think he said that as you're comparing apples to oranges.  Banning books or the implementation of bathroom laws doesn't threaten the lives of me or my family.  If they suddenly made guns illegal I'm still keeping my shotgun because he's right in that if a "bad guy" is motivated enough they'll find a way to get a gun (legally or illegally).  It should be really fricken difficult to get and own a gun legally though imo.

Who is talking about removing your shotgun?  Even most far left nuts know they're useful tools, especially out in the woods.  But why does anyone need an AK or a large caliber cannon that I hear shot from time to time across the valley.  I just laugh at how much that "fun" round cost them (a few beers) and listen to my dogs howl back...

Edited by redtail hawk
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Doc Brown said:

I don't think he said that as you're comparing apples to oranges.  Banning books or the implementation of bathroom laws doesn't threaten the lives of me or my family.  If they suddenly made guns illegal I'm still keeping my shotgun because he's right in that if a "bad guy" is motivated enough they'll find a way to get a gun (legally or illegally).  It should be really fricken difficult to get and own a gun legally though imo.


I think there is common ground to be found between confiscating all the guns and letting children’s corpses pile up in our classrooms. 
 

I don’t want to take people’s guns. I’m not sure a ban on the AR-15 would do much. Many people in my family have guns. If I didn’t live in a city, I’d probably have one too. 
 

A big part of the problem is that the NRA went from an organization that promoted gun safety to the lobbying arm of the gun manufacturers. We need people with gun expertise to be a productive part of the conversation about this or we’re either going to get clunky, ineffective laws from people who don’t grasp all the details or we’ll do nothing and kids will keep dying. 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

https://anthonyarms.com/gun/how-much-does-ammo-cost/

 

can't afford gas.  Can't afford a war on the gov't:

https://anthonyarms.com/gun/how-much-does-ammo-cost/

 

A .700 Nitro Express (17.8x89mm) caliber round, such as the one used on an H & H 700 Nitro Express Rifle, will set you back about $80 to $120 for a single round, not a box! This large-caliber ammunition is only used for large game hunting. So always keep in mind that the bigger the caliber, the more expensive it is.

Edited by redtail hawk
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Doc Brown said:

Impossible to tell as it's impossible to measure what laws on the books now have kept guns from "the bad guys."

 

doesnt that answer the question. in highly regulated democratic cities we should be seeing major decreases in gun violence. they are pretty good indicators what they may prevent. as of now noone feels safer in gun control states. thst should be enough to draw a conclusion on effectiveness.

 

well i put in another thread the first step is to prosecute ILLEGAL gun carry to the fullest extent. NATIONALLY. anyone wishing to carry a gun outside the home illegally should be terrified of getting caught, let alone using one in a crime. instead we have appearance tickets and people routinley walking out of jail with no real consequence. just avoid pulling the trigger in certain areas and its routine. yet gang violence, stray bullets, gun being the first go response to aggression in our society and culture. 

 

what fixes that besides bringing the hammer down on the crime before it can happen aka bring a SLEDGE hammer down on violent criminals that routinely have no issue walking around with a gun in their pocket or its just a waiting game as they go back into their communities to obtain another one to terrorize or worse the next victim. 

 

you can take all guns from people and all your left with is criminals that never cared about laws in the first place and still have gov officials that seem ok with slapping those people on the wrist. waiting to see them again under more tragic circumstances. are they trying to raise rates to make a better argument for universal gun control? at this point, after seeing the usual rap sheets of murders. sure seems like it.

 

so we can ultimately take "assualt weopons" or more from law abiding citizens. THEN and only THEN will leftists finally realize there's still gun violence. like i said, the regulated states haven't taught that lesson. hey we need to stop gun violence, we should get alot tougher on illegal carry! because there is nowhere else to turn or blame at that point. all i want to know is why are they waiting as lives are lost RIGHT NOW? id like someone to answer that. that wont prevent the tragedy we just saw but it would save ALOT of others.

 

 

Edited by Buffarukus
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Buffarukus said:

what fixes that besides bringing the hammer down on the crime before it can happen aka bring a SLEDGE hammer down on violent criminals that routinely have no issue walking around with a gun in their pocket or its just a waiting game as they go back into their communities to obtain another one to terrorize or worse the next victim. 

That alone doesn't fix it when parents teach kids to blast shotguns from the hip and laugh when their spouse falls from the recoil of a double barrel 12 gauge load of buck shot.  Other than that, I agree.

Edited by redtail hawk
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, ChiGoose said:


The Supreme Court first recognized the individual right to own firearms in 2008. 
 

The gun lobby has completely perverted the narrative and created a myth around guns. 

Heller was not the first rulling on that.  And the fact DC never even changed after the rulling is something.  From the federalist papers to English canon law.  Oh yeah. And that Oxford comma. 

 

Would add the machine gun ban of 36 also re iterated the private ownership of weapons when it was challenged. 

3 hours ago, redtail hawk said:

That alone doesn't fix it when parents teach kids to blast shotguns from the hip and laugh when their spouse falls from the recoil of a double barrel 12 gauge load of buck shot.  Other than that, I agree.

That's not the issue if talking gun violence. Criminals carrying handguns and not being charged by partisan da's is 

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites



^^
 

More logic.  
 

When MAGA sends in the Brownshirts to arrest or worse to minorities and gays they should be able to defend themselves.   
 

But yep sure head in the clouds libs……governments turning on their people because it’s been overrun by evil forces has never happened - would never ever happen here.  
 

 

 

At least you’ll have a knife.  

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Irv said:

Sad that douchebags like Demented Biden lie about guns being the number one cause of kid's deaths.  Another total lie by Biden.  

Even if it's the 2nd or 3rd leading killer shouldn't we want to fix that lol?   Cmon literally you make no point.  A politician twisted a statistic?!!  Please call out the hundreds of Republicans that will twist stats today and every time these shootings occur.

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Big Blitz said:

“Only the military should have guns.”

 

—-Total Morons

^^
 

Logic:

 

Why?  Why should the military only have guns?  
 

 

 

Doesn’t need an answer.  Only smart people get why they shouldn’t.  

Who said this?  You constantly quote things almost nobody says.  Just because you see something on Twitter doesn't make it a popular opinion.   Especially after an incident when people are being ultra hyperbolic.  Every progressive poster here has simply called for reasonable gun control.  

  • Eyeroll 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, BillStime said:

It's always something else - never EASY ACCESS TO GUNS that NO ONE OUTSIDE THE MILITARY needs.

 

 

 

36 minutes ago, L Ron Burgundy said:

Who said this?  You constantly quote things almost nobody says.  

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/17/2023 at 12:35 AM, B-Man said:

 

 

CIVIL RIGHTS UPDATE: 

 

A Federal Judge Blocks New Jersey’s Sweeping Restrictions on Public Gun Possession.

 

 

By banning firearms from a wide range of "sensitive places," the state effectively nullified the right to bear arms.

 

 

https://reason.com/2023/01/16/a-federal-judge-blocks-new-jerseys-sweeping-restrictions-on-public-gun-possession/

 


 

“Hardly no one supports banning guns.”

 

 

 

I have more.  Y’all revealed yourselves the last few years on everything post Covid

On 9/18/2022 at 11:06 PM, BillStime said:


Both


And ban guns. 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/30/2022 at 6:21 PM, Big Blitz said:

THEY WANT ALL YOUR GUNS

 

Canada’s Trudeau announces plan for national freeze on handguns

 

May 30 (Reuters) - Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau said Monday his government was introducing new legislation to implement a "national freeze" on handgun ownership and prevent people from buying and selling handguns anywhere in the country.

 

https://www.reuters.com/world/americas/canadas-trudeau-announces-legislation-prevent-buying-selling-handguns-2022-05-30/

 

 

 

Don't get deflected into some b.s. "you don't need that gun to hunt" argument.

 

They want all of them.  

 

The free world folks.  Looks like Nazi Germany.  


 

It’s what they’d do here.  

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would love to grasp the logistic details, of the people that think they can just remove guns from the population.

 

Like reality vs Ideology

 

 

22 minutes ago, Big Blitz said:


 

“Hardly no one supports banning guns.”

 

 

 

I have more.  Y’all revealed yourselves the last few years on everything post Covid

 

One can just read back through their comments since the terrorist attack in Tenn to see them saying just what it claimed no one says.

  • Thank you (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Big Blitz said:



^^
 

More logic.  
 

When MAGA sends in the Brownshirts to arrest or worse to minorities and gays they should be able to defend themselves.   
 

But yep sure head in the clouds libs……governments turning on their people because it’s been overrun by evil forces has never happened - would never ever happen here.  
 

 

 

At least you’ll have a knife.  

and the truth emerges from the septic tank.  who is going to buy you ammo, the koch's?  civil war is bad for business.  8 days a week.

Edited by redtail hawk
  • Eyeroll 1
  • Disagree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, redtail hawk said:

and the truth emerges from the septic tank.  who is going to buy you ammo, the koch's?  civil war is bad for business.  8 days a week.

Woosh.   drink coffee, re read.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Edited by Chris farley
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...