3rdnlng Posted March 30, 2018 Share Posted March 30, 2018 Look at all the retailers who have made inquiries about sponsorship of Laura Ingraham's show. It's not just Hobby Lobby and Chick-fil-A either. https://www.bing.com/search?q=apostrophe rules&FORM=PRFDHI&refig=3eb9108c358445bca81e2407397748ca&httpsmsn=1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warren Zevon Posted March 30, 2018 Share Posted March 30, 2018 20 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said: Look at all the retailers who have made inquiries about sponsorship of Laura Ingraham's show. It's not just Hobby Lobby and Chick-fil-A either. https://www.bing.com/search?q=apostrophe rules&FORM=PRFDHI&refig=3eb9108c358445bca81e2407397748ca&httpsmsn=1 Apostrophe RULES! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted March 30, 2018 Share Posted March 30, 2018 (edited) WE DON’T NEED NO THOUGHT CONTROL: Seventh-Grade Assignment: Write Letters to Lawmakers Begging for Gun Control. “I looked at it, and I told my son, ‘No, you’re not doing that assignment,’” Lee said. “Then I emailed his teacher the next day and told him that my son would not be writing that.” Blue Lives reports that the teacher agreed to exempt Lee’s son from the assignment without penalty. According to Lee, there were other parents in the class who had issues with the homework, but they didn’t find out about it until after their children had already turned it in. It’s not clear whether the teacher intended to actually mail the letters — but the truth is, it doesn’t really matter. Either way, this homework was straight-up propaganda, and it has absolutely no place in our schools. It was obviously the right decision for the teacher to have excused Lee’s son from the work, but propaganda should never have been given as a homework assignment in the first place. . “NOBODY WANTS TO TAKE YOUR GUNS AWAY”: Louisiana Democratic Party Chair Suggests Repealing the Second Amendment. The chairwoman’s comments put Louisiana’s incumbent Democratic Gov. John Bel Edwards in a precarious situation. Edwards, one of the deep South’s lone Democrats in statewide office, was elected in 2015 in part because he emphasized his pro-Second Amendment views. Since taking office, Edwards has walked a tightrope on the topic, expressing limited support for banning bump stocks and strengthening background checks. If Edwards hopes to be reelected next year, he will need to continue distinguishing himself as someone who is in some ways antithetical to the national Democratic Party, especially on the issue of gun control, in a state that President Donald Trump carried by over 20 points in the 2016 presidential election. The governor’s office did not return requests for comment. . Edited March 30, 2018 by B-Man Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted March 30, 2018 Share Posted March 30, 2018 1 hour ago, Cugalabanza said: Damn... The kids in the KISS video were scarier and American... right between the eyes Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boyst Posted March 30, 2018 Share Posted March 30, 2018 1 hour ago, Cugalabanza said: Damn... That you support this just shows what a hypocrite you are in the lack of understanding and the logic that you simply don't have. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cugalabanza Posted March 30, 2018 Share Posted March 30, 2018 3 minutes ago, Boyst62 said: That you support this just shows what a hypocrite you are in the lack of understanding and the logic that you simply don't have. Whatever, infant Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted March 30, 2018 Share Posted March 30, 2018 cuga is one of the few non-conservative posters worth not-ignoring on here Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boyst Posted March 30, 2018 Share Posted March 30, 2018 (edited) 11 minutes ago, Cugalabanza said: Whatever, infant Reasonable comeback from someone unable to stand behind their thoughts. Tell me: The choice of the puppet David Hogg and his sycophants to protest Laura Ingram is a direct reflection of their viewpoint which counters her beliefs politically. Her choice to criticize a public figure like Hogg, who has frequently expressed his belief in his own intellectual superiority, due to his lack of having qualifications to be accepted in to a few schools of higher education was genuine. It is not without merit and if you refute that then this argument must take a different course. However, you are supporting a free media criticism of an individual who is casting criticisms against the media. You are supporting someone who is castigating an entire political process that he has yet to be fully educated on (my belief is that there is probably less than 10 people in this world who can grasp what this country is truly based upon with enough cognisant ability to make a criticism to begin with) whilst all the while deflecting any negative criticism upon himself by labeling himself a victim? Why should he be singled out as someone who cannot be criticized? The dude is speaking out against an overwhelming majority of Americans, it's entire historical fabric, and doing so from a pulpit where he has yet to even be able to vote in an election. There is absolutely no reason that Ingram cannot speak out against him because he is a fool. The laymen, yourself and tiberius, would believe that he is being targeted by conservatives because he is a threat to our rights. He is not a threat. He will embody nothing more than a political puppet to empower a voting base. He will not invoke any change and be nothing more than a collapsed 15 minute of Fame attention whore that will be nothing more famous than the taint of Kim Kardashian. So, call me an infant all you want. Change this simple argument to a personal insult like Grant does because he is unable to form a reasonable response. This is just one small step to helping you understand where you are wrong and when you reply, which I seriously doubt you will, I know what you'll say and my response to that is lined up. I really am going to enjoy embarrassing you but it won't change anything. You are entrenched in the ways of a 6th grade education. Edited March 30, 2018 by Boyst62 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted March 30, 2018 Share Posted March 30, 2018 6 minutes ago, row_33 said: cuga is one of the few non-conservative posters worth not-ignoring on here So, in other words, he's not worthy? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted March 30, 2018 Share Posted March 30, 2018 8 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said: So, in other words, he's not worthy? cuga has a sense of humour and irony Canadians despise all people bereft of irony Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted March 30, 2018 Share Posted March 30, 2018 Just now, row_33 said: cuga has a sense of humour and irony Canadians despise all people bereft of irony Now that's ironic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted March 30, 2018 Share Posted March 30, 2018 (edited) 8 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said: Now that's ironic. just a sec, let me get it sorted out.... lots of time this week in Montreal, a very different type of irony than Toronto.... Edited March 30, 2018 by row_33 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted March 30, 2018 Share Posted March 30, 2018 36 minutes ago, B-Man said: WE DON’T NEED NO THOUGHT CONTROL: Seventh-Grade Assignment: Write Letters to Lawmakers Begging for Gun Control. That's nothing. My nephew, last year in second grade, had a "Please don't put my transgendered classmates in camps" letter-writing campaign to Trump. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cugalabanza Posted March 30, 2018 Share Posted March 30, 2018 14 minutes ago, Boyst62 said: Reasonable comeback from someone unable to stand behind their thoughts. Tell me: I don't have to tell you anything. I'm not supporting anything here or taking a stand one way or another. I was making fun of the kids. You realize of course that in the movie Village of the Damned, the kids are evil and have a supernatural power to make people do things against their will and eventually have to be destroyed to prevent them from taking over the world. It's a joke, you !@#$ing dolt. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted March 30, 2018 Share Posted March 30, 2018 8 minutes ago, Cugalabanza said: I don't have to tell you anything. I'm not supporting anything here or taking a stand one way or another. I was making fun of the kids. You realize of course that in the movie Village of the Damned, the kids are evil and have a supernatural power to make people do things against their will and eventually have to be destroyed to prevent them from taking over the world. It's a joke, you !@#$ing dolt. liberal Americans who can't take a joke are the worst people ever born... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted March 30, 2018 Share Posted March 30, 2018 18 minutes ago, row_33 said: liberal Americans who can't take a joke are the worst people ever born... What with all the French-Canadians up there to the North I would expect you to be pretty familiar with that trait. Avec tous les Canadiens-français qui se trouvent dans le Nord, je m'attends à ce que vous connaissiez bien ce trait. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted March 30, 2018 Share Posted March 30, 2018 23 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said: What with all the French-Canadians up there to the North I would expect you to be pretty familiar with that trait. Avec tous les Canadiens-français qui se trouvent dans le Nord, je m'attends à ce que vous connaissiez bien ce trait. They are the dominant demographic in our wonderful Province of Quebec and either the north or south of one Maritime province. Business time in Montreal is sorta like Toronto, but a few noticed differences, mostly appreciated... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LA Grant Posted March 30, 2018 Share Posted March 30, 2018 When will the white community address "white on white" gun violence? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted March 30, 2018 Share Posted March 30, 2018 ... Dumbest post of the year above ☝? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeviF Posted March 30, 2018 Share Posted March 30, 2018 (edited) 18 minutes ago, LA Grant said: When will the white community address "white on white" gun violence? Most violent crime is intraracial. Nobody disputes this. Your non sequiturs are getting more and more desperate though. It's kind of adorable. 3 minutes ago, LA Grant said: Actually, the facts dispute that. https://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/htus8008.pdf 84% of white people murdered by gun violence are murdered by white people. I'm gonna assume (probably a poor assumption, but whatever) that you simply misread what I wrote and that you do know what the prefix "intra-" means. Edited March 30, 2018 by LeviF91 Oh yay I caught it! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts