Jump to content

Hillary's Campaign Kickoff


Recommended Posts

 

And those are the only two options? This is exactly why the two party system has failed us. I'm actually kind of glad we're likely stuck with two evils. Maybe now people will get their heads out of their asses and wise up to what's going on.

 

Even if people wise up, and a lot have, there's no recourse left for the average citizen. Our votes don't matter unless those votes are backed by millions in PAC money. The system is broken because it's been bought. Two party, one party, three party -- won't change a thing until the special interests and dirty money is taken out of the system.

 

But that kind of change won't happen without a massive overhaul of the system -- which requires people to have more than just apathy when it comes to governance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"The intelligence source said the FBI is 'extremely focused' on the 22 'top secret' emails deemed too damaging to national security to publicly release under any circumstances..."

 

"... with agents reviewing those sent by Clinton as well her subordinates including former chief of staff Cheryl Mills."
"Mrs. Clinton sending them in this instance would show her intent much more than would receiving [them],” the source said. "Hillary Clinton was at a minimum grossly negligent in her handling of NDI [National Defense Information] materials merely by her insisting that she utilize a private server versus a [u.S. government] server. Remember, NDI does not have to be classified." According to the Congressional Research Service, NDI is broadly defined to include “information that they have reason to know could be used to harm the national security.”...

 

 

 

From: "Source: Clinton IT specialist revealing server details to FBI, 'devastating witness.'"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

‘SHE’S EASILY CONFUSED:’

 

Hillary Clinton calls out Bernie Sanders — and it backfires badly.

 

 

Related: Dick Cheney heaps praise on Hillary Clinton.”

 

 

 

“Hillary can’t win. She’s the establishment candidate in year of insurgency.”

—John Kass, the Chicago Tribune.

We are going to get our asses kicked unholy by Hillary Clinton in November. Those of you who think that this act is going to be super-popular and attract all of these “new voters”… I know you want to think that, but at some point, your theories really ought to begin evidencing their reality in the polls.

Instead, Hillary’s lead continues to grow. It will keep on growing.

Because America does not like authoritarians. And yes, Hillary is herself an authoritarian. But she’s pretending to not be one, and Trump is… well, Trump is “authentic” on that score I guess

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

‘SHE’S EASILY CONFUSED:’

 

Hillary Clinton calls out Bernie Sanders — and it backfires badly.

 

 

:lol::lol:

Shocking no one, Hillary picks up an "endorsement" from Dick Cheney. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/us-politics/8741148/Dick-Cheney-heaps-praise-on-Hillary-Clinton.html

 

But go on thinking she's going to be different, Hillary voters. She's not.

If this was already posted, apologies:

 

Bloomberg had a very interesting theory on Hillary's legal situation. "Obama urges an indictment in private but pretends to oppose it publicly, making his attorney general, Loretta Lynch, appear heroically independent when she proceeds with charges. That all but assures Lynch will be confirmed once President Biden names her to the Supreme Court." -- all in an effort to become next UN Secretary General.

 

http://www.bloomberg.com/politics/articles/2016-03-08/our-hillary-indicted-theory-is-crazier-than-yours-read-my-lips

Link to comment
Share on other sites

:lol::lol:

Shocking no one, Hillary picks up an "endorsement" from Dick Cheney. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/us-politics/8741148/Dick-Cheney-heaps-praise-on-Hillary-Clinton.html

 

But go on thinking she's going to be different, Hillary voters. She's not.

If this was already posted, apologies:

 

Bloomberg had a very interesting theory on Hillary's legal situation. "Obama urges an indictment in private but pretends to oppose it publicly, making his attorney general, Loretta Lynch, appear heroically independent when she proceeds with charges. That all but assures Lynch will be confirmed once President Biden names her to the Supreme Court." -- all in an effort to become next UN Secretary General.

 

http://www.bloomberg.com/politics/articles/2016-03-08/our-hillary-indicted-theory-is-crazier-than-yours-read-my-lips

Did you look at the date of the article? Also, Cheney basically called her the tallest midget by stating that she was one of the more competent people in the Obama administration. That article could have just as easily be published in The Onion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Did you look at the date of the article? Also, Cheney basically called her the tallest midget by stating that she was one of the more competent people in the Obama administration. That article could have just as easily be published in The Onion.

 

Which, strangely enough, is now owned by the media's biggest Hillary supporter. And no, I did not clearly. Read it before my coffee kicked in. :bag:

Edited by Deranged Rhino
Link to comment
Share on other sites

:lol::lol:

Shocking no one, Hillary picks up an "endorsement" from Dick Cheney. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/us-politics/8741148/Dick-Cheney-heaps-praise-on-Hillary-Clinton.html

 

But go on thinking she's going to be different, Hillary voters. She's not.

If this was already posted, apologies:

 

Bloomberg had a very interesting theory on Hillary's legal situation. "Obama urges an indictment in private but pretends to oppose it publicly, making his attorney general, Loretta Lynch, appear heroically independent when she proceeds with charges. That all but assures Lynch will be confirmed once President Biden names her to the Supreme Court." -- all in an effort to become next UN Secretary General.

 

http://www.bloomberg.com/politics/articles/2016-03-08/our-hillary-indicted-theory-is-crazier-than-yours-read-my-lips

They aren't thinking about anything. They're doing as told.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

THOU SHALL NOT QUESTION THE NARRATIVE!

 

CNN Anchor Taken Aback When GOP Guest Ties Clinton Camp to Birtherism.

 

 

WATCH: Hillary Clinton tells woman whose health care costs have skyrocketed to ‘keep shopping.’

 

When told [in 1994, that Hillarycare, the prototype for Obamacare] could bankrupt small businesses, Mrs. Clinton sighed,
When a woman complained that she didn’t want to get shoved into a plan not of her choosing, the first lady lectured, “It’s time to put the common good, the national interest, ahead of individuals.”

 

 

 

monopoly_hillary_4-20-15-1.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

When told [in 1994, that Hillarycare, the prototype for Obamacare] could bankrupt small businesses, Mrs. Clinton sighed, “I can’t be responsible for every undercapitalized small business in America.” When a woman complained that she didn’t want to get shoved into a plan not of her choosing, the first lady lectured, “It’s time to put the common good, the national interest, ahead of individuals.”

 

 

 

Typical SoProg. The problem with their policies is that people just aren't smart enough to understand how great they are! :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

THOU SHALL NOT QUESTION THE NARRATIVE!

 

CNN Anchor Taken Aback When GOP Guest Ties Clinton Camp to Birtherism.

 

 

WATCH: Hillary Clinton tells woman whose health care costs have skyrocketed to ‘keep shopping.’

 

 

When told [in 1994, that Hillarycare, the prototype for Obamacare] could bankrupt small businesses, Mrs. Clinton sighed, “I can’t be responsible for every undercapitalized small business in America.” When a woman complained that she didn’t want to get shoved into a plan not of her choosing, the first lady lectured, “It’s time to put the common good, the national interest, ahead of individuals.”

 

 

 

Yes, those leftist anchor news bunnies swim in a marinade of special reality where they neither hear, see, nor speak anything wrong about soprogleftistdemocrats, and all the world's troubles are laid at the feet of the Republicans.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I follow Old Pics Archives on twitter...and this just got posted...1993 photo of Hillary playing with a Game Boy. Funny how much it looks like that image of her with her Blackberry.

 

Really wish she just would have stuck with gaming.

 

CdhvkdLWwAAWds9.jpghillary_blackberry_0.jpg

Edited by LABillzFan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I follow Old Pics Archives on twitter...and this just got posted...1993 photo of Hillary playing with a Game Boy. Funny how much it looks like that image of her with her Blackberry.

 

Really wish she just would have stuck with gaming.

 

CdhvkdLWwAAWds9.jpghillary_blackberry_0.jpg

Up up down down left right left right B A Select Start didn't work in Benghazi

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Assuming she wanted to be saved.

 

But it wasn't her ass getting dragged through the streets in Benghazi so what difference, at this point, does it make?

 

SIdenote from Clinton yesterday: "We didn't lose a single person" in Libya.

 

How sad.

Funny I'm watching a cnn report on trumps falsehoods. I wonder when they'll get to Hillary.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Assuming she wanted to be saved.

 

But it wasn't her ass getting dragged through the streets in Benghazi so what difference, at this point, does it make?

I'm relatively certain if they cared enough to save our besieged Americans they could have before it was too late. There were enough special ops assets available nevermind more conventional forces.

 

I keep envisioning a scene like in black hawk down when the 2 delta snipers Gary Gordon and Randy Shugart and pilot Michael Durant are steadily overwhelmed by a mob. Not good. And to call the fallen heros families liars is unconscionable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm relatively certain if they cared enough to save our besieged Americans they could have before it was too late. There were enough special ops assets available nevermind more conventional forces.

Of course they could have. Stevens requested more security days before the attack. They left them for dead, lied about the cause, lied to the victims' families, then lied ABOUT the victims' families.

 

And she still beats Trump by 13 points.

 

Y'all think about THAT.

Edited by LABillzFan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Clinton commits Benghazi gaffe, saying US ´didn´t lose a single person´ in Libya

by Ed Henry

 

Original Article

 

 

Democratic presidential front-runner Hillary Clinton committed her second gaffe in as many days on the campaign trail Monday night, claiming that the U.S. "didn´t lose a single person" in Libya during her time as secretary of state. Clinton made the comment defending her push for regime change in the war-torn North African nation at an Illinois town hall hosted by MSNBC.

 

"Now, is Libya perfect? It isn´t," Clinton said. After contrasting her approach toward Libya with the ongoing bloodshed in Syria´s civil war, Clinton said "Libya was a different kind of calculation and we didn´t lose a single person ...

 

 

 

 

 

Ambassador Stevens was unavailable for comment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

She's not lying. It's just Clinton-speak that she learned from the master.

"I did not have sex with that woman... not a single time." No, you had sex with her multiple times you cad.

 

"Libya was a different kind of calculation and we didn't lose a single person." No, you lying piece of human excrement in shoes. We lost four of them and one was your fu cking employee.

 

The Clintons hate their employees. They pay women $0.76 on the dollar compared to their men.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Politico also picked up the story:

 

 

“Libya was a different kind of calculation. And we didn’t lose a single person. We didn’t have a problem in supporting our European and Arab allies in working with NATO,” the former secretary of state said during an MSNBC town hall on Monday night.

Clinton may have been referring strictly to the U.S.-backed overthrow of Libyan dictator Muammar Qaddafi in 2011, which indeed saw no loss of American lives and cost just around $1 billion. But her comments ignore the 2012 attacks at the U.S. mission and CIA outpost in Benghazi, which killed four people including U.S. Ambassador J. Christopher Stevens.

Ousting Qaddafi was worth it, Clinton said.

“Now, is Libya perfect? It isn’t. But did they have two elections that were free and fair where they voted for moderates. Yes, they did. So you know, changing from a dictator who has hollowed out your country to something resembling a functioning state and even hopefully more of a democratic one doesn’t happen overnight,” she said. “And we’ve got to continue to support the Libyan people, to give them a chance, because otherwise you see what has happened in Syria, with the consequences of millions of people flooding out of Syria, with more than 250,000 people killed, with terrorist groups like ISIS taking up almost — huge blocks of territory, as big as some of the states in that area.”

 

 

Yes, she did ignore the deaths of four Americans in Benghazi. But these remarks ignore a lot more than that.

 

Qaddafi’s Libya was a brutal dictatorship, but one that had been cooperating in some part against radical Islamist terrorist groups, and had a functioning military that kept them on the run. Decapitating the regime without any way to influence developments on the ground did not result in “a functioning state.” It resulted in a failed state. The government that held two elections cannot even claim all of Tripoli as under its control, and its writ runs nowhere else in the country.

 

Most stunning of all, Clinton seems unaware that ISIS is taking up blocs of territory in Libya now, too. So have al-Qaeda affiliates like Ansar al-Sharia — the group that sacked our Benghazi consulate nearly four years ago, thanks in large part to security decisions made by State under Hillary’s leadership. We didn’t give Libya a chance — we destroyed Libya, and left nothing but a viper pit of terror networks to replace it. And Hillary thinks this is a success story.

 

 

 

If we elect her as President, expect a lot more “success” stories like Libya.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How she's still a candidate is beyond me.

 

Because she's backed by a party comprising people like gatorman who simply do what they're told without ever questioning the party's intent.

 

Good little SoProgs always obey their overlords.

Edited by LABillzFan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Because she's backed by a party comprising people like gatorman who simply do what they're told without ever questioning the party's intent.

 

Good little SoProgs always obey their overlords.

What do you....hold on, Hillary is on the phone telling me what to do. I'll get back to you later!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...