Jump to content

Who believes in Manuel?


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 616
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Heitz.....besides from the natural talents that EJ has going in his favor this is the single biggest thing that makes me believe he will succeed.....

 

John unless you can speak in absolute facts and tell me 100% if EJ is going to be the best QB in the history of the NFL or the biggest bust ever to be drafted I'm just not sure what to think :D

Edited by Heitz
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I see such a mixed result in views of our #1 pick from last year that I am curious as to who actually believes in him and why or why not.

 

IMHO I believe in the kid. He seems to have the right attitude and work ethic. Minus a couple "learning curve" injuries I think EJ is our man. He has all the tools and Buffalo seems poised to put weapons around him and I think he can get it done. Am I in the minority or majority here?

 

My Response: I want to believe in Manuel. The jury is still out, some signs of greatness, but so much more to do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I appreciate the optimism, and all, but Flacco made it to the conference championship his rookie year, starting every game. If your prediction is going to come true, EJ has some catching up to do.

 

The normalized production of EJ's and Flacco's rookie seasons are vitually identical. As far as 2013 goes, Flacco returned to rookie/EJ-like production once again in what was his sixth year. I do not think Flacco is elite nor is he on a HOF path. I doubt he can justify that contract he received espcecially since Baltimore had to purge their roster to accomodate it.

 

He has held the starting job for 6 years (and not missed a game) and been good enough to get a consistently good team to the playoffs multiple times. Winning it all was surprising to me but Ozzie Newsome is generally credited with being one of the best organizational talent evaluators in the NFL and Flacco did not screw it up when they got their chance.

 

So, using Joe Flacco as the standard for EJ is not really setting the bar too high, imo.

Edited by JESSEFEFFER
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I dont like the thought of burning a high pick on another QB when we still have plenty of holes. The Bills scouted this guy and decided he was worth a 1st round pick. Be committed and build around him. The book on Manuel was that he was one of the most talented QB's last year, but was raw. As Ive said before. New rookie coordinator. Young receiving corps. Sub par o-line. Average to below average TE. As they get better, EJ will get better. Jim Kelly was average at best his first four years here. Add lofton and get reed and thomas some experience and the 1990 bills offense evolves into one of the best. Not to mention the improvements they made on the o-line in his first four years.

Washington spent two high picks on QB's in one draft last year. Looked smart to me. Edited by JaxBills
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So far it's turned out great for them.

They at least made the playoffs in one of those seasons, and largely because of QB play. The Bills have not made the playoffs in a very, very long time. It's hard to question the Redskins' approach from a Bills-oriented standpoint ...

 

The normalized production of EJ's and Flacco's rookie seasons are vitually identical. As far as 2013 goes, Flacco returned to rookie/EJ-like production once again in what was his sixth year. I do not think Flacco is elite nor is he on a HOF path. I doubt he can justify that contract he received espcecially since Baltimore had to purge their roster to accomodate it.

 

He has held the starting job for 6 years (and not missed a game) and been good enough to get a consistently good team to the playoffs multiple times. Winning it all was surprising to me but Ozzie Newsome is generally credited with being one of the best organizational talent evaluators in the NFL and Flacco did not screw it up when they got their chance.

 

So, using Joe Flacco as the standard for EJ is not really setting the bar too high, imo.

If you're going to assess Flacco, you can't exclude his 13-game playoff record. He has thrown 19 TDs to 8 INTs, and the Ravens have gone 9-4 with him as a starter. And it would be 10-3 if Lee Evans holds onto the ball.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They at least made the playoffs in one of those seasons, and largely because of QB play. The Bills have not made the playoffs in a very, very long time. It's hard to question the Redskins' approach from a Bills-oriented standpoint ...

 

 

If you're going to assess Flacco, you can't exclude his 13-game playoff record. He has thrown 19 TDs to 8 INTs, and the Ravens have gone 9-4 with him as a starter. And it would be 10-3 if Lee Evans holds onto the ball.

 

I am not excluding anything. Read the 2nd paragraph. That's my assessment. Joe Flacco's overall ability, much like Eli Manning's, has been the subject of much scrutiny amongst their interested observers. Given their 2013 seasons I suspect the doubters have gotten their 2nd wind.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am not excluding anything. Read the 2nd paragraph. That's my assessment. Joe Flacco's overall ability, much like Eli Manning's, has been the subject of much scrutiny amongst their interested observers. Given their 2013 seasons I suspect the doubters have gotten their 2nd wind.

Well, the doubters are foolish then. The Ravens have gone 62-34 with Flacco as a starter and 9-4 in the playoffs. Moreover, he CARRIED them in the 2012 playoffs, during which the Ravens defense gave up 419, 398, 428, and 468 yards in successive games. He's an elite QB although his numbers aren't Brees-like.

Edited by dave mcbride
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am not excluding anything. Read the 2nd paragraph. That's my assessment. Joe Flacco's overall ability, much like Eli Manning's, has been the subject of much scrutiny amongst their interested observers. Given their 2013 seasons I suspect the doubters have gotten their 2nd wind.

 

Doubters? They've won Superbowls. That's not doubtable. Please stop comparing EJ to SB winning QB's. It makes it that much sadder.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

EJ will start next year. If he doesn't show any progress, we'll have a repeat of the last decade, get a new coach, and blow it up again. It feels like we all argue about the same chit every off-season about EJ/ Fitz/ Edwards(who I think compares to EJ well)/ Losman or whoever.

 

If a QB has a higher grade to the team than EJ did at the draft, they need to take him.

 

Pittsburgh knew they had their guy, Indy knew they had their guy, twice. Washington knew, Seattle knew, green bay knew. It doesn't take long to see. I don't see it in EJ. He's just Trent Edwards with an arm.

 

I think this debate is a little more centered than the Edwards debate. Edwards got the love and support of a majority of Bills fans as I recall. Manuel has his supporters, but people are expressing doubts at roughly the same rate it seems.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

I think this debate is a little more centered than the Edwards debate. Edwards got the love and support of a majority of Bills fans as I recall. Manuel has his supporters, but people are expressing doubts at roughly the same rate it seems.

my only point is that in most cases, teams that have good QB's knew it going into year two. We, are still having the same issues of arguing if he will be the guy.

 

If the Bills belive that a QB is going to be better than EJ (and I think theirs a few) and he's available, and they don't take him, it'll be a travesty.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

You mean this:

 

"Simms won his first five starts of his rookie year. He led the team to a 6–4 record as a starter, throwing for 1,743 yards and 13 touchdown passes and was named to the NFL All Rookie Team. He was runner-up in 1979 for Rookie of the Year, losing out to future teammate, Ottis Anderson."

 

Next two paragraphs.

 

"Simms' next four years were marred by injuries and inconsistent play. He finished the 1980 season with 15 touchdowns and 19 interceptions, while completing a subpar 48.0% of his passes for 2,321 yards.[12] In 1981, Simms threw for 2,031 yards, 11 touchdowns, and 9 interceptions on 54.4% completion percentage[12] before suffering a separated shoulder in a November 15 loss to the Washington Redskins.[13] With Simms out, the Giants went on a run led by Scott Brunner and advanced to the second round of the playoffs. Simms suffered a torn knee ligament in a preseason game against the New York Jets, preventing him from playing the entire 1982 season.[14] Following the season, Ray Perkins resigned as head coach to take over the same position at the University of Alabama, and was replaced by the team's defensive coordinator Bill Parcells. In the coming years this change would prove crucial to the Giants and Simms.

 

One of Parcells first decisions as coach was to replace Simms as the starting quarterback with Brunner.[15] Simms asked to be traded after the benching, but his request was ignored.[16] During the sixth game of the Giants' 1983 Season, Simms came in to replace the struggling Brunner against the Philadelphia Eagles. On his second drive, Simms suffered a season-ending injury when the thumb on his throwing hand hit a player's helmet on his follow-through. The injury was reported as a dislocation, but according to the book, Simms to McConkey, written by Phil McConkey, Simms, and Dick Schaap, the injury was much more severe, with the thumb literally hanging off after impact, and the bone sticking out through the skin.[17]"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

you guys are ridiculous! it was a rookie season, he will come out of year 2 as the best buffalo quarterback ever in his 2nd year after college :)

 

Ridiculous personified.

 

 

 

Doubters? They've won Superbowls. That's not doubtable. Please stop comparing EJ to SB winning QB's. It makes it that much sadder.

 

I think you've hit the nail on the head. EJ, with all his at-best mediocrity, could well be a SB winning QB with a team as strong as Baltimore then. BUT...

 

We haven't had a strong team in decades. We NEED superior QB play to have a punchers chance and EJ Manuel AIN'T that guy!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

Ridiculous personified.

 

 

 

I think you've hit the nail on the head. EJ, with all his at-best mediocrity, could well be a SB winning QB with a team as strong as Baltimore then. BUT...

 

We haven't had a strong team in decades. We NEED superior QB play to have a punchers chance and EJ Manuel AIN'T that guy!

I don't understand why people think it is easier to find an elite QB, who can carry a team, than building a great team around a good QB? This is not about Manuel, just in general. How many QBs playing now are elite, four maybe five? The oldest being Payton Manning, drafted in 1998, so the last 15 years has produced a hand full of elite QBs.. It is the same for every era.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't understand why people think it is easier to find an elite QB, who can carry a team, than building a great team around a good QB? This is not about Manuel, just in general. How many QBs playing now are elite, four maybe five? The oldest being Payton Manning, drafted in 1998, so the last 15 years has produced a hand full of elite QBs.. It is the same for every era.

 

Elite QBs are probably the rarest animal in sports. And none, repeat NONE of the prospects in this draft have exhibited anything remotely resembling elite to this point. Just wait to see the inevitable backlash by that certain segment of fans when the team that drafts and starts one of them this year struggles at the QB position.

 

Man, when I think of the Niners and their incredible good fortune in having 20 years of QB play by back to back HOFers...

 

GO BILLS!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...