4merper4mer Posted January 9, 2014 Share Posted January 9, 2014 You haven't "called me" on anything. Rather, you've managed to showcase your lack of geopolitical understanding and displayed either a penchant for willful ignorance or an absolute absence of reading comprehension. If you'd like to participate in this discussion with me, scroll up, read post #93, and respond intelligently to it. Otherwise sit the !@#$ back down, because you're miles out of your depth here. Not all Muslims make people's heads roll down flights of stairs but everyone making people's heads roll down flights of stairs is Muslim. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jim in Anchorage Posted January 9, 2014 Share Posted January 9, 2014 You haven't "called me" on anything. Rather, you've managed to showcase your lack of geopolitical understanding and displayed either a penchant for willful ignorance or an absolute absence of reading comprehension. If you'd like to participate in this discussion with me, scroll up, read post #93, and respond intelligently to it. Otherwise sit the !@#$ back down, because you're miles out of your depth here. # 93 was a nice break down of why muslims resent half the world which you seem to think is a vald excuse for terrorism but you refuse to despute a single point in my post. Then of course you fall back to your primary weapon, insults. You must be a blast to have a real life debate with. Kill the insults, this DC Tom jr thing is not working for you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TakeYouToTasker Posted January 9, 2014 Share Posted January 9, 2014 (edited) # 93 was a nice break down of why muslims resent half the world No, #93 was a primer to why it's absoluetly wrongheaded to ascribe an overarching uniformity to the "philosophy of Islam". which you seem to think is a vald excuse for terrorism Quote for me, please, where I've mentioned terrorism, much less justified it. However, while we're at it, define terrorism, please. but you refuse to despute a single point in my post. You didn't make a single point in your post. Then of course you fall back to your primary weapon, insults. You must be a blast to have a real life debate with. Kill the insults, this DC Tom jr thing is not working for you. Your outrage takes a back seat to the fact that I haven't insulted you yet. You !@#$ing retard. There, now I've insulted you. Edited January 9, 2014 by TakeYouToTasker Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted January 9, 2014 Share Posted January 9, 2014 Your outrage takes a back seat to the fack that I haven't insulted you yet. You !@#$ing retard. There, now I've insulted you. Technically, that's just an observation, not an insult. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jim in Anchorage Posted January 9, 2014 Share Posted January 9, 2014 (edited) No, #93 was a primer to why it's absoluetly wrongheaded to ascribe an overarching uniformity to the "philosophy of Islam". Quote for me, please, where I've mentioned terrorism, much less justified it. However, while we're at it, define terrorism, please. You didn't make a single point in your post. Your outrage takes a back seat to the fact that I haven't insulted you yet. You !@#$ing retard. There, now I've insulted you. Take single line from my post and say thats wrong for these reasons. And keep in mind my post was a direct answer to "facts" you presented in your post, such as muslim extremists [ not necessarily terrorists but people who stone woman and chop off thieves hands] are a result of despots or nomadic lifestyles. Your debating style seems to be show off how smart you are with irrelevant facts then bluster and insults. Technically, that's just an observation, not an insult. Oh good one of Taskers court jesters has shown.up. This will raise the level of the debate. Tell me some witty jokes Tom. I'm bored. Edited January 9, 2014 by Jim in Anchorage Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted January 9, 2014 Share Posted January 9, 2014 Take single line from my post and say thats wrong for these reasons. And keep in mind my post was a direct answer to "facts" you presented in your post, such as muslim extremists [ not necessarily terrorists but people who stone woman and chop off thieves hands] are a result of despots or nomadic lifestyles. Your debating style seems to be show off how smart you are with irrelevant facts then bluster and insults. "Who was the despot in Afghanistan when the Taiban formed? Why Mullah Omar" is more than enough demonstration that you don't know ****. Three factual errors in thirteen words. Even for this board, that's a !@#$ing record. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jim in Anchorage Posted January 9, 2014 Share Posted January 9, 2014 "Who was the despot in Afghanistan when the Taiban formed? Why Mullah Omar" is more than enough demonstration that you don't know ****. Three factual errors in thirteen words. Even for this board, that's a !@#$ing record. You know you're not as bright as you think[no one is.] Why was Omar in charge? The muslims put him there not the US, not the soviets but the muslim population of Afghanistan. No I don't know the exact time frame of taibans raise vs Omars rule but he was a Taiban favorite. Certainly not a secular despot we need to call world wide jihad over as Tasker says. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TakeYouToTasker Posted January 9, 2014 Share Posted January 9, 2014 Take single line from my post and say thats wrong for these reasons. And keep in mind my post was a direct answer to "facts" you presented in your post, such as muslim extremists [ not necessarily terrorists but people who stone woman and chop off thieves hands] are a result of despots or nomadic lifestyles. Your debating style seems to be show off how smart you are with irrelevant facts then bluster and insults. That's not where the conversation starts, Jim. The conversation starts with an understanding of the issues that I raise in post #93. So, answer the questions I pose there, and then we'll move on. This conversation litterally has nothing at all to do with anything you've said, which when viewed in the very best light, is nothing but a reductive logical fallacy. To paraphrase Mark Twain: "The trouble with (your world view) is not that (you) know to little, but that (you) know so many things that aren't so." So let's start at the bottom, and build up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azalin Posted January 9, 2014 Share Posted January 9, 2014 (edited) Youn and Tasker are clueless, their religion is their culture, they are one and the same. Adults know this, it is a fact. It is not even debateable. Islam is a culture, a religion, a doctrine, it provides a legal system in Sharia Law, it is all one and the same, man you people are stupid, these are actual facts. clueless? because I see culture and religion as two different things? release your anger. share your pain....and gain strength from the sharing..... you are the yin to gatorman's yang Edited January 10, 2014 by Azalin Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jim in Anchorage Posted January 9, 2014 Share Posted January 9, 2014 (edited) That's not where the conversation starts, Jim. The conversation starts with an understanding of the issues that I raise in post #93. So, answer the questions I pose there, and then we'll move on. This conversation litterally has nothing at all to do with anything you've said, which when viewed in the very best light, is nothing but a reductive logical fallacy. To paraphrase Mark Twain: "The trouble with (your world view) is not that (you) know to little, but that (you) know so many things that aren't so." So let's start at the bottom, and build up. Oh the famous post 93. The one where you cleared up the whole muslim myth. What question did you ask? I don't see it. Just you going on about a thousand excuses about muslim extremist actions. Now, in our desperation to not give answers we are quoting Twain? Edited January 9, 2014 by Jim in Anchorage Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
4merper4mer Posted January 9, 2014 Share Posted January 9, 2014 Oh the famous post 93. The one where you cleared up the whole muslim myth. What question did you ask? I don't see it. Just you going on about a thousand excuses about muslim extremist actions. Now, in our desperation to to not give answers we are quoting Twain? It was actually Ronald Reagan that he quoted. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted January 9, 2014 Share Posted January 9, 2014 It was actually Ronald Reagan that he quoted. It was actually Josh Billings. . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Security Posted January 9, 2014 Share Posted January 9, 2014 (edited) Post 93 >>>>> real life slayings of women and gays in the Muslim world, the internet (I mean the whole internet, there is not 1 real truth, just what is on the greater than side of this equation), anything else everyone else thinks, Human Rights groups research Edited January 9, 2014 by Security Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jim in Anchorage Posted January 9, 2014 Share Posted January 9, 2014 It was actually Ronald Reagan that he quoted. I was going to say that but didn't know if maybe Reagan quoted Twain. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TakeYouToTasker Posted January 9, 2014 Share Posted January 9, 2014 I was going to say that but didn't know if maybe Reagan quoted Twain. He did. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
4merper4mer Posted January 9, 2014 Share Posted January 9, 2014 He did. Now I'm confused. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TakeYouToTasker Posted January 9, 2014 Share Posted January 9, 2014 Oh the famous post 93. The one where you cleared up the whole muslim myth. What question did you ask? I don't see it. Just you going on about a thousand excuses about muslim extremist actions. Now, in our desperation to not give answers we are quoting Twain? Why in the world would I waste time "answering" to absurdities? Especially given your staunch unwillingness to learn or reason? Instead I've decided to engage in a discussion about root cause, and hope that some folks might exit the conversation being not quite as !@#$ing stupid as they were coming in. Post #93 contains 3 questions posed in the first 3 paragraphs. Answer them. Post 93 >>>>> real life slayings of women and gays in the Muslim world, the internet (I mean the whole internet, there is not 1 real truth, just what is on the greater than side of this equation), anything else everyone else thinks, Human Rights groups research This is just a string of random words, right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jauronimo Posted January 9, 2014 Share Posted January 9, 2014 You would think that those who hate Muslims would actually know something about Muslims. Like who they are and where they come from. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boyst Posted January 9, 2014 Share Posted January 9, 2014 How the hell can ya'll know so much and be much more educated then I am and still resort to arguing such garbage? It takes what the OP said and then rips it apart to a new narrative to argue over and then gets fueled for lift off when someone chips in an error so egregarious that it actually means nothing and has no relevance to anything. Its what gives PPP a bad rep Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TakeYouToTasker Posted January 9, 2014 Share Posted January 9, 2014 egregarious e-gregarious? Is that when you enjoy the company of others on the internet? I don't think that's what PPP is about at all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts