Miyagi-Do Karate Posted September 27, 2012 Share Posted September 27, 2012 I think you raise a very strong possibility and I can only hope Wanny is practicing for just such a scenario. GO BILLS!!! Mallett is forcing the Bills to now prepare for 2 QB's!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TakeYouToTasker Posted September 27, 2012 Share Posted September 27, 2012 It's called sarcasm. GO BILLS!!! Thank God. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canadian Bills Fan Posted September 27, 2012 Share Posted September 27, 2012 I have a feeling this will be the game where we see the Bills blitz. You cant play conservatively against Brady otherwise he will pick your defense apart. I agree that the same can be said if we blitz him but I would rather see the Bills try to get to him and rattle him instead of dropping everyone back into coverage. CBF Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dorkington Posted September 27, 2012 Share Posted September 27, 2012 I'd like to see us rush 5. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
K-9 Posted September 27, 2012 Share Posted September 27, 2012 I was surprised by the number of run blitzes the Ravens brought on Sunday night. I wonder if Wanny follows suit. I don't see him dialing up too many blitzes until he sees whether or not he can get pressure with the front four. I think we'll see more line stunts than we've seen so far. I think NE* is vulnerable between the tackles as well as on the edges. Gronk looks miserable having to stay in to block so much. This might be the weekend they want to unleash him in the passing game so I hope we give them a reason to keep him in to block. GO BILLS!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dragonborn10 Posted September 28, 2012 Share Posted September 28, 2012 Tying this together with another thread, too bad Poz isn't here anymore to run into the guard and get stoned on contact Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsVet Posted September 28, 2012 Share Posted September 28, 2012 http://bostonglobe.com/sports/2012/09/25/wannstedt-back-with-bills-take-brady/D16TpKiz22ZTz3P2ZXgNdJ/story.html His scheme doesn't call for blitzes. He's got to get pressure from the front 4 as many others have pointed out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bigc14120 Posted September 28, 2012 Share Posted September 28, 2012 Zero. Zero and None! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NewEra Posted September 28, 2012 Share Posted September 28, 2012 I'd love to see us blitz more. All of our LBs are good at bringing the heat. Moats, IMO, should be the guy doing it most. He's not great in coverage and was drafted because he was a pass rusher. While I'm praying we see more blitzes, I don't see it happening very often, stache doesn't like to blitz. Bring four and hope the other guys can cover. If the pats keep extra blockers (TE and RB/FB chipping) in like the jets did. We're gonna be in for a long day. Give Brady time and we're gonna get torched. Bringing blitzes keep the offense guessing. If we rush 4 every play (like we did vs the jets) the guy calling the plays offensively has an easy job because he knows what we're going to do. Switch it up a bit and create some confusion and make the think. I beg you Stache!!!! BRING SOME HEAT THIS WEEK!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
San Jose Bills Fan Posted September 28, 2012 Share Posted September 28, 2012 Mallett is forcing the Bills to now prepare for 2 QB's!!! This is a troubling thought indeed. Thank goodness we don't have to worry about Bryan Hoyer anymore. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WhitewalkerInPhilly Posted September 28, 2012 Share Posted September 28, 2012 What are the odds they put Mallet in at some point? he's taller (can see over our line easier) he's got a quicker release ( so he can, theoretically, get the ball out quicker when under pressure) and most importantly he played in the SEC so he knows Dareus, Mario, Shephard, and Gilmore and how they play. He'll probably be able to read them better, no? The odds of the Patriots putting Mallet in are the odds that the Bills leave Brady mewling with pain and unable to stand. Anything else, and they have him in. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Orton's Arm Posted September 28, 2012 Share Posted September 28, 2012 I'd love to see us blitz more. All of our LBs are good at bringing the heat. Moats, IMO, should be the guy doing it most. He's not great in coverage and was drafted because he was a pass rusher. While I'm praying we see more blitzes, I don't see it happening very often, stache doesn't like to blitz. Bring four and hope the other guys can cover. If the pats keep extra blockers (TE and RB/FB chipping) in like the jets did. We're gonna be in for a long day. Give Brady time and we're gonna get torched. Bringing blitzes keep the offense guessing. If we rush 4 every play (like we did vs the jets) the guy calling the plays offensively has an easy job because he knows what we're going to do. Switch it up a bit and create some confusion and make the think. I beg you Stache!!!! BRING SOME HEAT THIS WEEK!! In the Super Bowl, the Giants had success by rushing three or four guys, and dropping the rest back into coverage. Brady had nowhere to throw the ball! If you're going to use a strategy like that, you have to have your DBs play tight coverage. That's the #1 thing required to make that strategy work; and the one thing without which it cannot possibly work. Brady will destroy you if you play soft coverage in a scheme like that. (Much like Sanchez did to us a few weeks ago. Except that what Brady would do to us would be worse than what Sanchez did.) Take away anywhere for Brady to throw the ball. Then rely on your front four to generate a good pass rush. If you want to confuse the offense, have the DL do a lot of stunts; and do some sneaky things with some of the guys in coverage. A strategy like that can contain the Patriots' offense, at least if you have the right players in place to execute it. I think the Bills have a pretty good bunch in place, though I'm still a bit nervous about the pass coverage. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuffBill Posted September 28, 2012 Share Posted September 28, 2012 Kelvin Sheppard is the most obvious choice for this. He's so fast. DB's however don't have much experience at it McKelvin I can see letting go. Brady must be touched up for Buffalo to have a chance. Maybe they are keeping the blitzing to a minimum because as bad as the DB's have been covering receivers, they dont' want to take away any of their help? That as well as the DL has been getting some good pressure on the QB by themselves. Doesn't seem like they are going to take too many risks with the Defense this year, at least it hasn't so far. Mallett is forcing the Bills to now prepare for 2 QB's!!! That is nothing, the Pats have to prepare for Brad Smith! (sarcasm intended). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MikeSpeed Posted September 28, 2012 Share Posted September 28, 2012 I say we rush 10 and drop 5 into coverage. If they still had the replacement refs we could get away with it. Darn NFL they ruin all my great ideas! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Salty Posted September 28, 2012 Share Posted September 28, 2012 I think Dareus and K. Williams are going to be exploding the middle of the line setting up blitzes on the outside (Moats). Also Im wondering if Byrd gets a blitz (risky). Mostly Im hoping we dont need to blitz much, but if its obvious that we arent getting pressure, then the Bills D better get a different scheme going or the "Stache" is going to get smashed. Blood is in the water, this year do we have a couple sharks??? The Pats have to slip sometime, lets start now, by putting Brady on his TUSHY. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
K-9 Posted September 28, 2012 Share Posted September 28, 2012 I think Dareus and K. Williams are going to be exploding the middle of the line setting up blitzes on the outside (Moats). Also Im wondering if Byrd gets a blitz (risky). Mostly Im hoping we dont need to blitz much, but if its obvious that we arent getting pressure, then the Bills D better get a different scheme going or the "Stache" is going to get smashed. Blood is in the water, this year do we have a couple sharks??? The Pats have to slip sometime, lets start now, by putting Brady on his TUSHY. As a matter of form, we never use words like 'tushy' when discussing football in a football forum. Allow me to translate: We need to plant Brady on his ASS! GO BILLS!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Salty Posted September 28, 2012 Share Posted September 28, 2012 As a matter of form, we never use words like 'tushy' when discussing football in a football forum. Allow me to translate: We need to plant Brady on his ASS! GO BILLS!!! excuse me homie, were talking about Marcia Brady, so it is apporiate to use the word TUSHY! hahaaha LETS GO BUFFALO!! MAKE HIM EAT DIRT THROUGH IS ASSSSSS!!!! (is that better) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
K-9 Posted September 28, 2012 Share Posted September 28, 2012 excuse me homie, were talking about Marcia Brady, so it is apporiate to use the word TUSHY! hahaaha LETS GO BUFFALO!! MAKE HIM EAT DIRT THROUGH IS ASSSSSS!!!! (is that better) After a quick review of board standards, you are absolutely correct. Whenever referring to the Ugg-wearing Brady, you may indeed use more feminine descriptive terms. Nice catch. Seeing as how we play on an artificial turf, I can't see us making him eat dirt through his ass. He's much more likely to suffer a turf burn on his labia. GO BILLS!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clippers of Nfl Posted September 28, 2012 Share Posted September 28, 2012 After a quick review of board standards, you are absolutely correct. Whenever referring to the Ugg-wearing Brady, you may indeed use more feminine descriptive terms. Nice catch. Seeing as how we play on an artificial turf, I can't see us making him eat dirt through his ass. He's much more likely to suffer a turf burn on his labia. GO BILLS!!! Cant billieve you typed that. Either way, lmao Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
2003Contenders Posted September 28, 2012 Share Posted September 28, 2012 If I had more confidence in our CBs then I would advocate blitzing more. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts