Jump to content

Where 2 go with #2 reciever


  

112 members have voted

  1. 1. Who should number 2 receiver

    • Marcus Easley
      21
    • Naaman Roosevelt
      4
    • Derek Hagan
      2
    • David Nelson
      7
    • Donald Jones
      2
    • Draft Malcolm Floyd
      13
    • Sign - Mario Manningham
      22
    • Sign - Hines Ward
      1
    • Sign - Early Doucet
      11
    • Sign - Brandon Lloyd
      9
    • Sign - Plaxico Burress
      2
    • Sign - Steve Smith
      3
    • Kamar Aiken
      2
    • David Clowney
      0
    • Draft - Juron Criner
      1
    • Draft - Stephen Hill
      2
    • Draft - Marvin McNutt
      3
    • Sign - Chaz Schilens
      0
    • Draft - Alshon Jeffery
      2
    • Bring back Lee Evans give him #83 as well
      3


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 40
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I truly can't believe the 2nd highest vote getter (ATM) is Marcus Easley. If he's our #2 when the season starts, I don't think our offense gets much better. I don't care about stats. I want guys that can get open and move the chains. I don't know of easley can do that. No one does. If we don't sign anyone in FA, I hope we draft Michael Floyd (not Malcolm, he's on SD).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There are no good options. I can't imagine the Bills having the luxury to draft a WR early enough to be

a legit number 2 this year. Many will disagree, but I don't like Michael Floyd, especially at #10. I'd rather

see them reach for an OT or marginal DE like Melvin Ingram than take Floyd.

 

I think that their best option would have been to sign another decent TE like Carlson or Bennet and go

2 TE, with Stevie Johnson and David Nelson at WR. The remaining FA WRs are nothing special (they could

just as well get Josh Reed out of retirement) and they can't afford to spend an early pick on a WR in the

draft with the state that the defense is in (and LT).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why not Draft Kendall Wright(Baylor) he was RG3 main guy & projected Top 10

 

He is not big and didn't prove to be nearly as fast as advertised at the combine. For a smaller

guy who was supposed to be a speed-demon, his 4.61 40 should be a real red flag. He looked

"soft" in the body, too (IMHO) - ie, he didn't have the well defined, low-body-fat body that

most receivers do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...