Jump to content

Get a couple of good players or 1 great player


  

88 members have voted

  1. 1. Who should The Bills focus on getting in FA?

    • A couple of good solid players (Mincey, Carr, Colston)
      54
    • Go all out for Mario Williams and no one else
      34
    • Go all out for VJax and no one else
      0


Recommended Posts

From looking at our cap room, it seems like we can go into FA 2 ways. Either try to get a couple of good solid players (not talking about 2nd tier players) like Carr, Mincey, Colston, or should the Bills go all out for either Mario Williams or VJax?

Edited by ryan42790
Link to comment
Share on other sites

From looking at our cap room, it seems like we can go into FA 2 ways. Either try to get a couple of good solid players (not talking about 2nd tier players) like Carr, Mincey, Colston, or should the Bills go all out for either Mario Williams or VJax?

I voted for three players.

I still believe football is a team sport. With the one exception being the importance QB has become.

So to me get three players in a 'need' position. Then draft the others.

 

LT in first.

DE in second and third.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I voted for three players.

I still believe football is a team sport. With the one exception being the importance QB has become.

So to me get three players in a 'need' position. Then draft the others.

 

LT in first.

DE in second and third.

I still think that's good players give you a chance to go to the playoffs and into the superbowl... but with that being said, a great player gives you a chance to do something really special, like goto 4 street superbowls...(see: bruce smith)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd go with the guy who will have over 100 career sacks when his career is over.

Mario Williams has 53 career sacks in his first 6 years so it's very far from a foregone conclusion that he'll finish his career with 100 sacks… in fact at his current rate it's unlikely.

 

 

Or were you referring to John Abraham who has 111 career sacks?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mario Williams has 53 career sacks in his first 6 years so it's very far from a foregone conclusion that he'll finish his career with 100 sacks… in fact at his current rate it's unlikely.

 

 

Or were you referring to John Abraham who has 111 career sacks?

 

Truly when you toss his rookie year, and one major injury his rate looks highly likely to hit 100

 

That said - one great DE or QB any day, otherwise 3 good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From looking at our cap room, it seems like we can go into FA 2 ways. Either try to get a couple of good solid players (not talking about 2nd tier players) like Carr, Mincey, Colston, or should the Bills go all out for either Mario Williams or VJax?

It's better to get a guaranteed great player in FA and then hope you can get great players in the draft. We already have bunch of good to average players, we need game changers. If we can't great players in FA don't bother.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Truly when you toss his rookie year, and one major injury his rate looks highly likely to hit 100

 

That said - one great DE or QB any day, otherwise 3 good.

He's played in 82 career games and has 53 career sacks.

 

That's .646 sacks per game which amounts to 10.34 sacks for a 16 game season.

 

This means that at his current rate he'd have to play 5 more completely injury-free seasons to reach 100 career sacks.

 

He played 5 seasons before his first significant injury.

 

I say at best, he's 50-50 to reach 100 career sacks.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We can sign Williams and still get a couple of decent FAs, so I don't get the poll exactly. We can't have VJ an MW but we can have one and more. BTW I say go for Williams. The D is instantly impressive and tough, the O already is okay and sometimes very okay.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We can sign Williams and still get a couple of decent FAs, so I don't get the poll exactly. We can't have VJ an MW but we can have one and more. BTW I say go for Williams. The D is instantly impressive and tough, the O already is okay and sometimes very okay.

 

I'm really trying to be in the mindset of Nix. Don't forget we have some more to sign of our own, Levitre and Byrd and extending Fred. Also we are going to have to really over pay for Williams or Vjax (more so Williams) I really don't think we will have enough room to sign another significant player.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I voted Mario.

Going into the season with a front-4 of Mario-Dareus-Kyle-Curry/Merriman would automatically give us one of the best DLines in the league.

 

It's a single step that takes us from average to elite, and helps our LBs and DBs.

 

 

+1 on this.

 

I'd rather get one difference maker like Mario that will make the entire defense better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He's played in 82 career games and has 53 career sacks.

 

That's .646 sacks per game which amounts to 10.34 sacks for a 16 game season.

 

This means that at his current rate he'd have to play 5 more completely injury-free seasons to reach 100 career sacks.

 

He played 5 seasons before his first significant injury.

 

I say at best, he's 50-50 to reach 100 career sacks.

 

I'd say short of getting hit by a bus he's got 6 more years in him, easily. If he matches production of 4 standard years plus 2 down years, he's there.

 

Further if you wash his rookie year out as an anomaly (which makes sense to do, as there's that steep first year curve) I believe your math would in turn say at the end of year 4 he should be pretty tight on 100, even if he misses a couple games.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I voted Mario.

 

Going into the season with a front-4 of Mario-Dareus-Kyle-Curry/Merriman would automatically give us one of the best DLines in the league.

 

It's a single step that takes us from average to elite, and helps our LBs and DBs.

Me, too. I want a dominant pass rush in the worst way. I'm so tired of the secondary getting eaten alive due to lack of pressure on the opposing QB. The Bills have a ton of draft picks to address other needs plus they could likely add depth/help with a solid, low cost FA or two. Go all in on Mario. If he isn't interested of appears far too pricey, switch gears and move on to 'plan B'.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would not break bank on V Jax. Would much prefet to see Mario and Garcon. Completely feasable if Nix is willing to spend money. Those 2 would significantly upgrade us on both side of the ball. Add Martin in 1st round and a promising DE later and i would be one very happy Bills fan. If they spend money on Mario, i will start buying merchandise and tickets again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I voted for three players.

I still believe football is a team sport. With the one exception being the importance QB has become.

So to me get three players in a 'need' position. Then draft the others.

 

LT in first.

DE in second and third.

 

+1 I completely echo everything in this post.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Damn reasonable question and i am surprised name calling has not started yet. The main reason i did not vote Williams is because he has the league by the short ones. Almost every team NEEDS this guy. I suspect his contract will be near record setting for the position.

The part that is so difficult for me and should be for you folks is that.. you are right, we would have one of THE most feared defensive lines on the earth.

But honestly is that what is best for the team right now? I think we can draft one or two DE this year that will make us better than last year and hoping for much better down the road.

Edited by 3rdand12
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd say short of getting hit by a bus he's got 6 more years in him, easily. If he matches production of 4 standard years plus 2 down years, he's there.

 

Further if you wash his rookie year out as an anomaly (which makes sense to do, as there's that steep first year curve) I believe your math would in turn say at the end of year 4 he should be pretty tight on 100, even if he misses a couple games.

I think we both have equal merit in our completely opposing arguments.

 

I'd finish by saying that I recall when most everyone was considering Tiger Woods to be a shoo-in to break The Golden Bear's majors record.

 

Five years in football is a very long time.

 

If I'm betting, I'm betting the under.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...