Dragonborn10 Posted September 18, 2011 Share Posted September 18, 2011 McKelvin is garabge in coverage but that long TD was Wilson's play to make... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bangarang Posted September 18, 2011 Share Posted September 18, 2011 Game is over. GTFO with this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Simon Posted September 18, 2011 Share Posted September 18, 2011 McKelvin is garabge in coverage but that long TD was Wilson's play to make... He wasn't alone but yeah, he played that post horribly Game is over. GTFO with this. Yes, by all means. Now that the game has been over for 25 minutes, let's never speak of it again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phil Hansen Forever Posted September 18, 2011 Share Posted September 18, 2011 It would have been that close if Lindell had hit that 29 yard fieldgoal. We wouldn't have been sweating it out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bills!Win! Posted September 18, 2011 Share Posted September 18, 2011 Nobody is complaining about the Bills secondary from when Warren Moon torched the Bills in the first half of the 1993 comeback game. Why? Because they won. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DaveinElma Posted September 18, 2011 Share Posted September 18, 2011 I think with all the focus on the Raiders power running game and that their top 2 WRs were out that the Bills DB's really weren;t prepared for Campbell taking all these deep shots. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jad1 Posted September 18, 2011 Share Posted September 18, 2011 Nobody is complaining about the Bills secondary from when Warren Moon torched the Bills in the first half of the 1993 comeback game. Why? Because they won. Yeah, and 3 weeks later they got torched by Dallas' offense in the SB. The offense looks like a contender this season. If the Bills are going to make a playoff run, the defense needs to be addressed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joey greco Posted September 18, 2011 Share Posted September 18, 2011 Wilson was way late on his read and too slow to make it up. McKelvin played for inside help properly, but Wilson didn't hold up his end. P.S. McKelvin still sucks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob in STL Posted September 18, 2011 Share Posted September 18, 2011 Wilson was way late on his read and too slow to make it up. McKelvin played for inside help properly, but Wilson didn't hold up his end. P.S. McKelvin still sucks. ^^^ He is right on both statements. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dragonborn10 Posted September 18, 2011 Author Share Posted September 18, 2011 Wilson was way late on his read and too slow to make it up. McKelvin played for inside help properly, but Wilson didn't hold up his end. P.S. McKelvin still sucks. Totally agree...That should have been a pick or break up by Wilson...and McKelvin still sucks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
silvermike Posted September 18, 2011 Share Posted September 18, 2011 It wasn't the Super Bowl. When you make mistakes in Week 2, it's okay to talk about them as you start looking out for next week. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DrDawkinstein Posted September 18, 2011 Share Posted September 18, 2011 What youre all starting to see is that Wilson isnt really that good as SS. I know everyone thought he was god because he was someone/anyone other than Whitner, but this was a weak spot going into this season. Wilson is better at FS than SS. Expect DBs to still be drafted going forward. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yungmack Posted September 18, 2011 Share Posted September 18, 2011 The Raiders picked on McKelvin all day long and he was pathetic. You know who Brady's going after next week, along with every other team on the schedule. I think McKelvin will be on the bench very, very soon. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WhitewalkerInPhilly Posted September 18, 2011 Share Posted September 18, 2011 The Raiders picked on McKelvin all day long and he was pathetic. You know who Brady's going after next week, along with every other team on the schedule. I think McKelvin will be on the bench very, very soon. And replace him with whom, pray tell? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Simon Posted September 18, 2011 Share Posted September 18, 2011 The Raiders picked on McKelvin all day long and he was pathetic. You know who Brady's going after next week Actually, I think Leodis might match up better vs the Patriots offense, than any other DB or LB on the roster; although Bryan Scott as a hybrid Nickel Lb may hold his own as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fixxxer Posted September 18, 2011 Share Posted September 18, 2011 And replace him with whom, pray tell? With someone that can play disciplined football? With someone that can learn from mistakes? It seems McKelving is regressing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted September 18, 2011 Share Posted September 18, 2011 What youre all starting to see is that Wilson isnt really that good as SS. I know everyone thought he was god because he was someone/anyone other than Whitner, but this was a weak spot going into this season. Wilson is better at FS than SS. Expect DBs to still be drafted going forward. Searcy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuffOrange Posted September 18, 2011 Share Posted September 18, 2011 It would have been that close if Lindell had hit that 29 yard fieldgoal. We wouldn't have been sweating it out. You know this how exactly? If that FG is good the Bills would've gone for 2 at some point after one of their TD's. And depending on the outcome of that 2pt conversion, they would've either been down 35-33 or tied at 35. Either way the play-calling would've been ultra-conservative (because that's what NFL coaches do in that spot) and the Raiders would've used their time outs on defense, and we would've set up for a FG. And then if that FG is good, maybe Oakland gets it back with a minute left instead of 14 seconds. Lindell needs to make that kick, yes (it was 39 yards btw). But it's possible it ultimately worked in our favor. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ramius Posted September 18, 2011 Share Posted September 18, 2011 You know this how exactly? If that FG is good the Bills would've gone for 2 at some point after one of their TD's. And depending on the outcome of that 2pt conversion, they would've either been down 35-33 or tied at 35. Either way the play-calling would've been ultra-conservative (because that's what NFL coaches do in that spot) and the Raiders would've used their time outs on defense, and we would've set up for a FG. And then if that FG is good, maybe Oakland gets it back with a minute left instead of 14 seconds. Lindell needs to make that kick, yes (it was 39 yards btw). But it's possible it ultimately worked in our favor. The kick was blocked, how is that Lindell's fault? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuffOrange Posted September 18, 2011 Share Posted September 18, 2011 The kick was blocked, how is that Lindell's fault? It's hardly impossible for a block to be the kicker's fault. I don't know if it was or it wasn't because I don't have the luxury of studying the trajectory of the ball. It's great that you gloss over my entire post and try to pick a fight with me though instead of the guy who was ya know, actually complaining about Lindell. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts