DreReed83 Posted September 13, 2011 Share Posted September 13, 2011 SARS. U people. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eball Posted September 13, 2011 Share Posted September 13, 2011 Guys, in all seriousness, whatever Easley's condition may be, the Bills would be in very hot water if they disclosed the nature of the condition without his full informed consent. We'll know soon enough. It seems ridiculous, however, to even suggest this is some sort of "punishment" move by Gailey. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
South Jersey Bills Fan Posted September 13, 2011 Share Posted September 13, 2011 We know it wasn't substance abuse as that violates league policy and it's made public, we can assume it's not something inherited like asthma which is not something gailey would shy away from discussing, which most likely leaves something embaressinf he brought on himself. If only the national sports media paid attention to the bills we'd know by now! This! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
truth on hold Posted September 13, 2011 Share Posted September 13, 2011 SARS. U people. That's someone messing around. According to wikis own write up SARS "As of today, the spread of SARS has been fully contained, with the last infected human case seen in June 2003 (disregarding a laboratory induced infection case in 2004)." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DreReed83 Posted September 13, 2011 Share Posted September 13, 2011 That's someone messing around. According to wikis own write up SARS "As of today, the spread of SARS has been fully contained, with the last infected human case seen in June 2003 (disregarding a laboratory induced infection case in 2004)." Wiki's guess is good as any of yours. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted September 13, 2011 Share Posted September 13, 2011 SARS. U people. You put that in yourself? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
london_bills Posted September 13, 2011 Share Posted September 13, 2011 (edited) i may be completely wrong here... its pure speculation i know, but i think it is a mental issue like depression or something, especially if you look at Morans latest tweet. Saying he has "nothing to be ashamed of". It would make some sense as for Gailey not to disclose it. Edited September 13, 2011 by london_bills Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted September 13, 2011 Share Posted September 13, 2011 Wiki's guess is good as any of yours. No, actually our guesses are better, since they involve diseases that are actually known to be active. You may as well say that Easley was bitten by a velicoraptor... ...hmmm. Be right back... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
truth on hold Posted September 13, 2011 Share Posted September 13, 2011 Wiki's guess is good as any of yours. It's not a guess it's someone purposely messing around. iF HE HAS SARS CDC WOULD BE ALL OVER BUFFALO AND QUARANTINE the place Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jauronimo Posted September 13, 2011 Share Posted September 13, 2011 i may be completely wrong here... its pure speculation i know, but i think it is a mental issue like depression or something, especially if you look at Morans latest tweet. Saying he has "nothing to be ashamed of". It would make some sense as for Gailey not to disclose it. Finally, a reliable source. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted September 13, 2011 Share Posted September 13, 2011 i may be completely wrong here... its pure speculation i know, but i think it is a mental issue like depression or something, especially if you look at Morans latest tweet. Saying he has "nothing to be ashamed of". It would make some sense as for Gailey not to disclose it. Moran's tweets? The velicoraptor story's more credible. It's official: Easley attacked by dinosaur. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eball Posted September 13, 2011 Share Posted September 13, 2011 i may be completely wrong here... its pure speculation i know, but i think it is a mental issue like depression or something, especially if you look at Morans latest tweet. Saying he has "nothing to be ashamed of". It would make some sense as for Gailey not to disclose it. I'd bet my daughter's life he's correct. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
london_bills Posted September 13, 2011 Share Posted September 13, 2011 haha fair enough, easley just seems an anxious kind of person to me also Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GG Posted September 13, 2011 Share Posted September 13, 2011 i may be completely wrong here... its pure speculation i know, but i think it is a mental issue like depression or something, especially if you look at Morans latest tweet. Saying he has "nothing to be ashamed of". He can't dance? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted September 13, 2011 Share Posted September 13, 2011 He can't dance? His real name is "Wilbur"? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
South Jersey Bills Fan Posted September 13, 2011 Share Posted September 13, 2011 His real name is "Wilbur"? he's got a snaggle-tooth? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bladiebla Posted September 13, 2011 Share Posted September 13, 2011 Not since they traded him to the Ravens, no... My bad Martin has a 15.5 nfl career ypc, excluding his nfl europe stats: http://www.footballdb.com/players/ruvell-martin-martiru01 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nanker Posted September 13, 2011 Share Posted September 13, 2011 Okay you brain scientists, FYI - The Bills cannot disclose any personal health information that they may be privy to without the consent of the individual - in this case, Mr. Easley. His privacy is protected by the Federal HIPAA law which subjects individuals and companies to fines and penalties for unlawfully disclosing personal health information without proper consent. Guess away, but don't look for a OBD proclaimation on this unless Easley approves it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted September 13, 2011 Share Posted September 13, 2011 Okay you brain scientists, FYI - The Bills cannot disclose any personal health information that they may be privy to without the consent of the individual - in this case, Mr. Easley. His privacy is protected by the Federal HIPAA law which subjects individuals and companies to fines and penalties for unlawfully disclosing personal health information without proper consent. Guess away, but don't look for a OBD proclaimation on this unless Easley approves it. But the whole velociraptor story...that they could disclose, right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eball Posted September 13, 2011 Share Posted September 13, 2011 Okay you brain scientists, FYI - The Bills cannot disclose any personal health information that they may be privy to without the consent of the individual - in this case, Mr. Easley. His privacy is protected by the Federal HIPAA law which subjects individuals and companies to fines and penalties for unlawfully disclosing personal health information without proper consent. Guess away, but don't look for a OBD proclaimation on this unless Easley approves it. You mean like I said here? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts