Beerball Posted June 18, 2011 Share Posted June 18, 2011 I don't understand it, but I know I don't like it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nanker Posted June 18, 2011 Share Posted June 18, 2011 They don't like Ralph. He's worth millions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bruceisloose78 Posted June 18, 2011 Share Posted June 18, 2011 ahhh very funny, the writer chooses to take a cheap shot at our offense because we suck so bad we wish you only needed to move the ball 80 yards to score. nice piece, that article should be in the amherst bee not on nbc Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
transient Posted June 18, 2011 Share Posted June 18, 2011 I think it has dual meaning - First, the author is pissed he has to travel to New Jersey to watch yet another of his home teams, and second, this cut-rate hack thinks if he mentions an NFL team his editor will reassign him from covering high school football. I just love it when someone thinks that pissing on someone else's foot will make him feel better about wearing old beat up sneakers with the hole in the toe Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ExWNYer Posted June 19, 2011 Share Posted June 19, 2011 I don't understand it, but I know I don't like it. Lazy, piss-poor headline. Just another unwarranted cheap shot at the Bills. And for those of you who want to say "he's right...they suck...winning will make them relevant and stop all of this bashing...blah, blah, blah...": St. Louis, Tennessee, Seattle, Cleveland, Chicago, Arizona, & Carolina all had fewer total yards than the Bills and Minnesota, Miami, Cleveland, & Carolina all scored less. Why single out Buffalo? Yes, they've earned their share of criticism, and rightfully so, but crap like this gets tiring and is unjustified. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Offside Number 76 Posted June 19, 2011 Share Posted June 19, 2011 It is funny. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuffaloFan68 Posted June 19, 2011 Share Posted June 19, 2011 Our offense is not as bad as the stats show. Now that we will have a much improved D and not waste time & energy on Trent= our O will look sooooo much better! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted June 19, 2011 Share Posted June 19, 2011 It means anyone can be a "sports writer" these days. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sisyphean Bills Posted June 19, 2011 Share Posted June 19, 2011 It means that if Lehman would just pay a star to play there, their field would be long enough. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bills1960 Posted June 19, 2011 Share Posted June 19, 2011 Since when are we the worst offense in the league? Screw him, unnecessary cheap shot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Captain Caveman Posted June 19, 2011 Share Posted June 19, 2011 Waaaggghhhhh. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RTW2012 Posted June 20, 2011 Share Posted June 20, 2011 He can take a shot at the Bills, okay. However, it sounds like he has no idea how long a football field really is. He keeps saying the field is 80 yds long, 20 yds shorter than needed. Last time I checked, football fields are 120 yds long. Any sports writer worth a bucket of warm spit should know that. 'Nuff said. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
K-9 Posted June 20, 2011 Share Posted June 20, 2011 He can take a shot at the Bills, okay. However, it sounds like he has no idea how long a football field really is. He keeps saying the field is 80 yds long, 20 yds shorter than needed. Last time I checked, football fields are 120 yds long. Any sports writer worth a bucket of warm spit should know that. 'Nuff said. Unless you're in Canada where, with a first and goal at the five, you can hear a QB say, "Hey Gordie, go long." GO BILLS!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
billsfreak Posted June 20, 2011 Share Posted June 20, 2011 I don't understand it, but I know I don't like it. I think they mean that if the Bills only had to go 80 yards they might score a little more. If you have a little bit of a sense of humor and face reality it is kinda funny. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuffaloBill Posted June 20, 2011 Share Posted June 20, 2011 Lazy, piss-poor headline. Just another unwarranted cheap shot at the Bills. And for those of you who want to say "he's right...they suck...winning will make them relevant and stop all of this bashing...blah, blah, blah...": St. Louis, Tennessee, Seattle, Cleveland, Chicago, Arizona, & Carolina all had fewer total yards than the Bills and Minnesota, Miami, Cleveland, & Carolina all scored less. Why single out Buffalo? Yes, they've earned their share of criticism, and rightfully so, but crap like this gets tiring and is unjustified. Thenproblem fornthe Bills is that their stats and record have been sub par for a decade. Not to mention when they have played elite teams in that time Spanish they often found embarrassing ways to lose ballgames. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted June 20, 2011 Share Posted June 20, 2011 I think they mean that if the Bills only had to go 80 yards they might score a little more. If you have a little bit of a sense of humor and face reality it is kinda funny. It's stupid no matter how you look at it. Oh and Ralph is cheap. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Offside Number 76 Posted June 20, 2011 Share Posted June 20, 2011 Lazy, piss-poor headline. Just another unwarranted cheap shot at the Bills. And for those of you who want to say "he's right...they suck...winning will make them relevant and stop all of this bashing...blah, blah, blah...": St. Louis, Tennessee, Seattle, Cleveland, Chicago, Arizona, & Carolina all had fewer total yards than the Bills and Minnesota, Miami, Cleveland, & Carolina all scored less. Why single out Buffalo? Yes, they've earned their share of criticism, and rightfully so, but crap like this gets tiring and is unjustified. The headline would have been just as funny were any of those other teams inserted. It's just our turn this time. Relax. Thenproblem fornthe Bills is that their stats and record have been sub par for a decade. Not to mention when they have played elite teams in that time Spanish they often found embarrassing ways to lose ballgames. Huh? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beerball Posted June 20, 2011 Author Share Posted June 20, 2011 Huh? ¿Qué? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
billsfreak Posted June 20, 2011 Share Posted June 20, 2011 It's stupid no matter how you look at it. Oh and Ralph is cheap. And? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts