Search the Community

🚨A WARNING ON THE EXIT POLLS🚨 I should pin this, but I'm not going to pin it, so just pay attention and please remember this warning... Do not put a ton of stock in NEP, CES or VoteCast Exit Polls. Take them with a grain of salt WHETHER THEY ARE GOOD OR BAD for your candidate. They are revised MULTIPLE times including after Election Day, and have been wrong more than right in the modern era. In 2000, Florida was bogusly called for Gore, who thought he was going to win. He lost. In 2004, Team Kerry was celebrating certain victory after he got them, showing that he was even going to win Virginia, Florida and Ohio. Tim Russert was BEAMING! Kerry lost all three, and the election. 2016, Hillary Clinton was ahead in EVERY single battleground state, She lost ALL of them, plus some others and the election. In 2020, Biden won, except only four days later. His lead was not nearly as large as Exit Polls suggested. In 2022, Republicans looked unbeatable in the first and second waves back in 2022. They underperformed, especially in key states and lost those elections. Now, please go back and reread 🚨A WARNING ON THE EXIT POLLS🚨 above.

Even liberal icons Hillary, Schiff, Lieu and Kamala got in on the voting machines are vulnerable conspiracy theory....before they magically became impenetrable.

Several women made allegations that Joe Biden assaulted them from inappropriate fondling to violent sexual assault. Kamala Harris declared she believed these women. Joe Biden assaulted women, according to Joe Biden. Kamala Harris partnered with Joe Biden, presumably trading her indignation for power. Bill Clinton was accused of assaulting multiple women. His wife, Hillary declared these women were bimbos and part of a vast right wing conspiracy. Bill Clinton, according to Bill Clinton, settled with at least one of his accusers. Bill Clinton subsequently leveraged his power dynamic to engage in a work place relationship with a young intern, denied it. Hillary Clinton partnered with Bill, presumably trading pride and anger at being manipulated for power. Kamala Harris vigorously supported Bill Clinton being her surrogate on the campaign trail, presumably trading outrage over the treatment of certain women for power. Voting for Bill Clinton was akin to voting for assault. Voting for Hillary Clinton was akin to voting for assault and enabling behavior. Voting for Harris is voting for assault on all women and predators in general. ' A real sticky wicket, this election season.

As you guys are so fond of arguing: turnabout is fair play. https://money.cnn.com/2015/10/14/media/donald-trump-hillary-clinton-saturday-night-live-equal-time/index.html It's an FCC (not FEC) rule; my bad. And, as usual, there are lots of interpretations and exceptions to the so-called "equal time" rule. And there's a lot we don't know. Did they offer Trump and Jill Stein and whoever a chance to appear on NBC late night? Have those other candidates demanded it? If they don't demand it, then there's no violation. If they do, well, then maybe NBC will give Trump a free 90 second ad on Monday night. Who knows. At any rate, I see zero basis for suggesting it's a criminal violation, unlike Musk's situation where it may very well be one. So as far a slowing down a touch? Please take your own advice.

These were the results of the last three elections alone with this polling company in Iowa. I want Trump to win but it's hard to ignore how accurate this pollster was. Selzer is really going out on a limb here and if she's right it'll be a Flippen landslide victory in the electoral college for Harris given how this translates to the blue wall states. 2020 Final poll: Trump 48. Biden 41 (7 points) Actual results: Trump 53. Biden 45 (8 points) 2016 Final poll: Trump 46. Hillary 39 (7 points) Actual results: Trump 51. Hillary 42 (9 points) 2012 Final poll: Obama 47. Romney 42 (5 points) Actual results: Obama 52. Romney 46 (6 points)

Also one of Slick, Hillary, and Webb Hubble's daughter doing this at i believe the DNC coention at MSG ib 1992.

Anyone with a functional brain would know that the 'Cheny' he should be talking about as a war hawk (and potential war criminal) is the former VP (who Scooter Libby was working for and Trump pardoned) her FATHER. He was VPOTUS not Liz. So why is he talking about Liz and not dad? Who the f knows he is losing his marbles, but one can speculate. She is a she and he feels safe attacking women. She is campaigning agains him. And why 9 guns? (justices) and why at her face (is this some sudo sexual fantasy?) either way the illusion to pointing us at a political rival "to see how she likes it" is so out of line. I mean Biden said the word garbage and Hillary said deplorable but guns in the face of a woman "to see how she likes it" yes that's fine shut up libs and let the felon get to the real work of "protecting women if they like it or not" (and since were on it most likely he meant the people telling him (his advisors) not to talk about protecting women but again losing his marbles. sigh.

Why I'm guessing Trump will win: - state polling has been pretty unreliable, which is not surprising. You're usually dealing with a smaller sample of a smaller population so errors are compounded, so I don't have much faith in them. - somehow (I don't know how since response rates are awful since the landline died) national polling is still pretty good. I look to Silver's aggregate, which at least attempt to separate the good pollsters from the weak ones. He currently has Harris with something on the order of a 1.1 point lead. - the popular vote, of course, isn't what counts, but it correlates pretty well with electoral outcomes. And typically the tipping point has been about a 2.5% or better Harris popular vote win is what she needs to win the electoral vote. - 2016: Hillary wins the popular vote by 2 percent; loses the electoral college - 2020: Biden wins the popular vote by 4.5 percent; wins the electoral college Of course, differentially higher turnout on the Harris side could change things. But right now, Harris's polling lead looks a lot more like a 2016 result than a 2020 result.

Everyone already agreed we never wanted to see Hillary again yet here she is every 4 years

23 minutes between posts. 😉 (40 - 17 =23) “here is a YouTube video, I bet you could google the person referenced in it to learn even more.” Adam Carlson. Video is 15 minutes long. So that leaves 8 minutes to review the links and write your summary. (Hey everyone we have a savant among us) so I’m sure you were pretty in depth. Okay so you’ll say how in depth was I, about the same. Great two uninformed internet fools yelling at each other. credible sources - I’ve been on here long enough with you to know there are none you deem credible so that’s a fools errand. you have a video of Trump saying he pays for junk polls (that you didn’t watch). you have a video of a high percentage of junk polls showing up you have Nate silver saying it could move the numbers but I have secret sauce to fix that (who also is paid by JD’s patron) several others at those links say similar. do you have a source that shows they (he Mr pedantic) are not doing these things? Do you have a source that shows RCP is accounting for all these biased polls? Weren’t they off on Hillary? By a lot, if memory serves. As I have said on numerous occasions, polls are voodoo, and they can be manipulated and manufactured (who is polled, how the questions are phrased, number of polls run, etc). If you want to have a discussion cool, but seriously get off your high horse.

That was a 1 on a scale of zero to Hillary passing out.

Biden calls Trump supporters 'garbage' in shock moment evoking Hillary Clinton's 'deplorables' insult by Wills Robinson President Joe Biden overshadowed his vice president Kamala Harris' big 'closing' campaign speech by calling Donald Trump's supporters 'garbage' in an astonishing outburst. The 81-year-old commander-in-chief's bombshell gaffe evoked memories of Hillary Clinton's infamous dismissal of Trump voters as 'deplorables' in 2016, which contributed to her shock loss. However, Biden, on a separate Zoom call with supporters, stepped on her moment by appearing to lash out at Trump supporters in what Republicans lambasted as a 'disgusting' attack. The president was weighing in after a comedian at Trump's Madison Square Garden rally on Sunday compared Puerto Rico to a 'floating island of garbage'. Biden said: 'The only garbage I see floating out there is his supporters.' https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14017665/Biden-calls-Trump-supporters-garbage.html

Hillary Trubisky could win 11 games with roster...

No matter who wins there is one thing we can be sure of, one camp will be saying that the election was stolen or fraudulent in some way shape or form Hillary did it, Trump did it, and the beat marches on so we all know prior to the out come what kind of BS we will have to listen to for the next 6 months after the election ...

Greenwald, yes, although he has Hillary/Obama Derangement Syndrome now. Not sure what The Intercept is since he left. The others are commenters, not reporters. I actually want a good, responsible, fact-checking, right-leaning news source. The WSJ is still good, but obviously that's the old right wing. Fox News/Melugin actually did a good job reporting on the border fiasco, so they have the capability but lack the desire to be a serious news organization. Most of the Twitter monkeys pasted here all the time are just right wing hot take machines.

I was at a Hillary event in 2016. Bill was her surrogate. He filled the entire time. I'd estimate 90 minutes. He has real charisma.. It wasn't what I'd call fun. But it was an almost must see spectacle.

New Study Confirms What the Left Denies, Corporate Media Is Just Democrat Propaganda Brandon Morse I've had trouble saying the term "mainstream media" like I used to, because over the past decade, a real shift has occurred in the media space thanks to the internet. A streamer with a solid following can bring in numbers that the big corporate broadcasters can only dream of. More people watch popular streamers on Rumble for their news than various CNN shows. The corporate media, with its bottomless pits of cash, massive sound stages, armies of crewmen, and big-time names in television, are having to compete with a young man in his bedroom with a webcam and some cheap lighting. I find that both hilarious and a bit ironic. For ages, the corporate media has been looking down at the people, lying to them, and abusing them, and now they're being overtaken by them. But a part of that is the corporate media's fault. They used their platforms to push obvious lies to the people, which was easy to get away with before humanity had the internet. Today, a lie can get around the world quickly, but the truth doesn't have to get its pants on anymore. It can destroy the lie right there in bed. For instance, X's "community notes" feature is a master at destroying false media narratives before they can truly get started. Yet, push they do. And that's lead to their ongoing downfall. Few actually trust the media anymore, according to recent studies. And while we all know this is the truth, hard evidence continues to come out that shows the corporate media is really just a mouthpiece for the Democrat Party. It's pure propaganda, not news. According to the Media Research Center, after analyzing the corporate news landscape for a time, MRC found that it set a new record in terms of lopsided coverage. Not only did it prop up Kamala Harris with positive news coverage by unforgivable amounts, it focused on painting Trump as the villain with negative news coverage even more: One week before Election Day, a new analysis from the Media Research Center finds that broadcast evening news coverage of the 2024 presidential race has been the most lopsided in history. Since July, ABC, CBS and NBC have treated Democratic Vice President Kamala Harris to 78 percent positive coverage, while these same networks have pummeled former Republican President Donald Trump with 85 percent negative coverage. The difference in coverage between the two candidates is far greater than in 2016, when both Trump and then-challenger Hillary Clinton received mostly negative coverage (91% negative for Trump, vs. 79% negative for Clinton). It’s even greater than in 2020, when Joe Biden was treated to 66 percent positive coverage, vs. 92 percent negative for Trump. https://redstate.com/brandon_morse/2024/10/28/new-study-confirms-what-the-left-denies-corporate-media-is-just-democrat-propaganda-n2181174

Are you in possession of the facts here? These are self identified non citizens. The state's actions were a continuation of a precedent set in 2006 by gov Tim Kaine. Recognize that name? Hillary's running mate and favorite of on of our staunch Dem poster's here?

When Donald Trump’s campaign announced plans for a rally at Madison Square Garden, Democrats and their media allies knew they had a problem. Trump was going to pack the house on their turf. So they wasted no time pushing the tired Hitler narrative and claimed that the choice of venue was an homage to a pro-Nazi rally held there in 1939. It wasn't just liberals in the media pushing this narrative, either. Hillary Clinton accused Trump of “actually re-enacting the Madison Square Garden rally in 1939.” Even the Harris-Walz campaign joined in on the rhetoric. “Donald Trump’s got this big rally going at Madison Square Garden,” Kamala's running mate Tim Walz said at a campaign event in Henderson, Nevada. “There’s a direct parallel to a big rally that happened in the mid-1930s at Madison Square Garden.” Well, the rally took place Sunday night, and boy, talk about the worst Nazi rally ever! In addition to the diverse speakers at the event, a black woman sang the national anthem. The only Nazi symbols you saw at all came courtesy of the Democrats. https://pjmedia.com/matt-margolis/2024/10/27/worst-nazi-rally-ever-n4933703

Hillary is Hitler!

Advisor to Bill and Hillary Clinton:

Fair point. My use of it represents more of a sentiment against the establishment than a historical populist such as Huey Long. From the Great Recession to the mid part of last decade, people were sick of the Bush/Clinton/Romney types and looking for something different. Ron Paul had huge momentum before 2012 until Romney and the elite worked together to stamp that out. Trump and Sanders had a lot of momentum before 2016, but the difference in success was the Democrat's use of superdelegates to say "Too bad, we are picking Hillary anyway". I was looking forward to seeing the establishment toppled and wished that it had been anyone else but Trump, but when he won, I was glad to see an end to the whole Recycling Clintons and Bushes movement. Some of this sentiment went away after the chaos of the 2020 election, but it is still strong. What people still do not like is a tone deaf administration and Biden and Harris has been this to many. I wish there were better choices. If any Republican besides Trump ran, Harris would be down 15-20 point. If the democrats had picked someone other than Harris after Biden stepped down, Trump would be down 15-20 points. I really hope that both parties do better next time around.

Gillette, Bud Light, Kamala Calling an entire sex toxic is no way to sell blades, beer or candidates By Don Surber FTA: Kamala Harris, who seeks to be the first black woman president and second plagiarist (FJB beat her to that punch) now finds herself in Hillary’s high heels. At any rate, Kamala has discovered that the gender gap runs two ways. If women are supposed to support a female candidate just because she is a woman, then men have the right to support a male candidate just because he is a man. This concept has finally dawned on Democrats and their servants in the press, who decry this reasoning as toxic masculinity. The press has convinced itself that mincing Walz and Emhoff the Nanny Knocker Upper are the new model of the modern man, as he sits on the toilet and pees. The polls show men are rejecting Kamala for the same reason she rejects them. Columnist Nicole Russell wrote, “A new USA Today/Suffolk University poll shows former President Donald Trump leading among men 53% to 37%. Vice President Kamala Harris' lead with women is 53% to 36%. “The gender gap in this election matters beyond politics and portends significant problems for the nation.” I don’t agree. The problems are there. Women are 50% more likely to get into college and men are 9 times as likely to be in prison. The media and the government repeatedly try to emasculate men as they want to turn us into drones for these queen bees. The gender gap merely shines light on the problem. After decades of this stereotyping of men as evil and the constant discrimination against men, males have had it. The backlash may have begun with Hillary but it later torched Gillette, which launched a ridiculous ad campaign on attacking toxic masculinity. ... Having learned nothing from Gillette or Bud Light, Democrats plunged forward into the Big Muddy of their War on Men this year. In October, it finally dawned on them why their boots and clothes were wet. https://donsurber.substack.com/p/gillette-bud-light-kamala?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=1115457&post_id=150644668&utm_campaign=email-post-title&isFreemail=true&r=9bg2k&triedRedirect=true&utm_medium=email .

So just because i admittedly vote for someone doesn't mean that i agree with everything that comes out of their mouth, & there has been quite a few times that i wish Trump would STFU and just do the job because IMHO the job he has done is far better and far out weighs the use of his mouth . And the reason why i voted for him is because he came from outside of DC . Hillary as we all know is as freakin crooked as they come and will look you in the face with you holding the evidence that she lied and she she didn't, Joe well he is a career politician need i say more ? And i personally would rather have a business man that has failed numerous times only to come back in his career than a career politician that has done little of nothing in his career . Those are the people that have put this country in the place it is today and most of those that voted for them are still ignorant enough to believe them when they say they are all about change WTFE !! And as i have said in past posts Einsteins definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting a different out come . So if i voted for someone out side of the normal DC career full of BS politician & there are those who voted for one of the swamp creatures that put the country where it is today who's the insane hypocrite ? Then seeing as i've explained my self about why i backed the orange man but don't agree with everything he says that should tell you just how wrong you are in your assumption of me being a hypocrite . But if things go as they usually do you will ride that horse till his legs give out despite the explanation and why i voted for one crook over the other and will again because this candidate is more lost than last years easter eggs and is totally being told everything to say by someone other than her self ... I wish another business man would run but they usually are way to harsh for todays over sensitive American population because they see through the BS and do what needs to be done even if it does hurt some peoples feelings which is in some part is why the hatred for the orange man is so rampant and any others like him will more than likely not be supported enough to ever win a election . So the swamp will continue on the way it has for many more years .

I'm not going to just let you discredit Hillary Clinton, Chuck Schumer, Nancy Pelosi, Al Gore and Joe Biden like that It's possible they just had a misconception of what took place all those times they BASELESSLY challenged elections the Dems had lost