Jump to content

Juice_32

Community Member
  • Posts

    3,486
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Juice_32

  1. That's what I thought. Thanks for the logic lesson.
  2. Nice. Let's hold them to your Foles standard. Copy and paste me some data that proves they will play "consistently at a Super Bowl MVP level", your knock on Foles earlier, and I'll buy your "logic".
  3. Your question was pretty unspecific, I was just trying to clarify. I'd rather have Foles and a rookie.
  4. You mean would we have beat the jags with him?
  5. Maybe you failed to read where I said he'd not prevent us from getting a rookie and I'd still get one.
  6. He had a great year with Chip K. and looked rough with with Rams. On their playoff run and in the Super Bowl he outplayed Tom* Brady*. Id still get a rookie if we went after him, but the guy deserves some credit.
  7. Super Bowl MVP = retread. Tough crowd. I'd be happy with Foles and don't think that getting him prevents us from moving up for a top rookie.
  8. There was a lot of criticism from the national media on the Lynch hire in SF. I think he's done a hell of a job and that team is going to surprise next season, even if they don't land Sherman.
  9. I can't believe we got a 3rd for TT. Now Beane can carry out his ultimate plan and draft 6 QBs in the first 65 picks.
  10. I wonder the same thing every time.
  11. He's definitely proved to be more than just a track guy playing football. I wish he could have stayed healthy here.
  12. Logan Thomas has a cannon.
  13. I keep going back to this as well. They picked this years class over last years. Now, I don't think they expected to make the playoffs no matter what they say, but I am still expecting them to get one of the top 4 guys.
  14. He's a 10 foot tall beast man who showers in vodka and feeds his baby shrimp scampi.
  15. I watched the game with several non football fans tonight and they all commented on his homerism.
  16. This is called playing to win. Refreshing to see.
×
×
  • Create New...