colin

utter horsesht. losman is, was, and will be terrible. he sucks. he is a lang ball throwing coach killing sack of garbage qb. he's terrible.

he is lazy and has shown no desire to improve in his nfl career. worst qb to ever get 30+ starts.

if he just returns punts he might be worth his cash. if he can become a slot guy getting the ball 3 times a game as a WR/RB he would be great for us. still, can we do that with him? would we trade a pick from him for the TE from denver? i think a TE getting 60+ balls would be worth more, but without that i think parrish is great. add a pass rush and we might get an extra 1 to 2 returnable punts a game with a better D. parrish will break at least 5 of those extra 30 or so punts, maybe not all for scores, but at least for good field position.

it's my fault. i gave you way way too much credit, assuming you could apply thought and simple logic. i'm sorry, i've done a horrible thing. you don't even know the difference between your and you're, or they're and their. it's sad and i've been mean to you. how many times in your life have you typed "your ignorant"? you have to crawl before you can man up to a slow stroll and understand the very simple things i've put in front of you. i'm sorry for hurting you little boy. tell you mom i'll be by later with the cop uniform to swing the baton.

you are aware that in some cities the desire to find police recruits outstrips those willing to do the job so they actually do have new cops who have criminal histories, correct? http://www.policeone.com/legal/articles/17...r-new-recruits/ this is happening in a large number of american cities. police are unionized civil servants and have a bunker mentality against anyone trying to discipline them or regulate their behavior. cops may join with the best of intentions, but years of dealing with societies run off will bring out the worst in most people.

i am far from ignorant. to explain simple logic and the english language to you: i didn't say one has to have a degree from a good school or make a large amount of money to be smart, but CLEARLY given a large group of people in a profession (like say police work) not attracting top graduates from top schools or paying high salaries will result in not employing the best qualified and ambitious people in large numbers. if you offer people a bad wage for hard work dealing with the bottom of society you will eliminate the vast majority of good candidates. you just can't get over your homoerotic hero worship of men in uniform. cops are just people who have a particular job. so are soldiers. they aren't righteous or better than anyone just because they do a job that (when done right) is an important part of civil society, and they are likely to succumb to all the usual sins and temptations, and those are particularly likely to affect police who have to make difficult decisions in high risk situations. these people are simply not the best and brightest. we live in a capitalist society and money and status count in a very very big way. and no sht more people than not do bad work, most people are below average and don't put the effort in, or have the acumen to succeed. just look at how fat uneducated and lazy the average person around you is. if you have people that can't learn a foreign language or even speak their native one correctly, do you really think they will succeed in high pressure situations and not cut corners and skimp on due diligence?

99.9%? that's total pollyanna bull sh--. police work is thankless, low paying, and not very selective. you don't get graduates from top schools becoming cops. you don't get the best and brightest doing it. it doesn't pay much. it is shtty shtty work. as a cop you have to enforce plenty of stupid laws that exist as a cash grab (traffic tickets, parking crap) and victimless crimes (drugs, alcohol, prostitution). do you really think that 99.9% of people who have that job are just saints? that's the only people who would do it without wanting to go on power trips, be crooked, or are action junkies. further more do you think that after a few years rolling in the much of the underclass of society a cop won't get jaded and angry? sure there are good cops, but cops are selected from an above average or elite cut of society, and they don't exactly associate with the best and the brightest, so why do so many people assume that cops are better than average?

if he didn't hit anyone and got tasered i wouldn't be shocked if the clevland cops got sued.

never even talk to cops. citizens in the usa have rights, and not talking to cops would stop many arrests and almost all convictions.

i love scoe, but if we get a pick that we can swap for the TE from denver, well that makes us a much more balanced team right now. we have 2 other sick return men, and you will notice that now only our slot back (reed) and our super deep threat (evans) are small without him. our two young guys and TO are big giant WRs, that's a better fit for our O.

born in buffalo

1billsfan, if i knew you in real life, and i had a horrible penis canker, i would tell every single person i know, and meet, that i have the penis canker, but would never reveal that i knew you. that's how terrible your posts are. your horrible losman ball washing, combined with your seriously learning disabled understanding of the game, it's nuances, and yes life in general. i'm going to stretch my hamstring so i can kick myself in my own face. that will hurt less than what you do.

because offensive production doesn't count? you are becoming a cartoon character bill, you think any o lineman with talent is worth his weight in uranium, even if he is lazy, hurt, and an expensive malcontent. your boi peters was at least as bad against miami as gandy was against pittz, and a call or two differently gets zona the bowl. left tackles are not as important as you think they are.

some of you guys make me laugh. there have been plenty of big time expensive big men that had all the talent in the world, and never amounted to jack. peters sucked the bag against miami, he was one on one vs porter and got SMOKED to allow a safety. you guys (bill in nyc) are all over gandy for getting beat in the super bowl vs the number 1 d in the nfl (while still throwing for over 400 yards) but think peters is good enough while getting trashed in our own division? he's not consistent enough to get #1 lineman in the nfl money. i'd like to keep him, but it isn't like he's made us a top 20 even offense.

peters reminds me of another tackle, but on the D side. sean gilbert. sean was an oft injured malcontent who commanded a retarded contract. after one or two seasons of albert haynesworth level domination, he was always hurt and pretty useless. big fat half retarded man children fail much much more often than they succeed. sam adams, who was ten times the pro gilbert was, has had an issue with being lazy and unmotivated on every team he's been on. peters, who i'd like to play like he did in 07 and be a great guy for us, seems way closer to gilbert than sam adams.

plenty (most prolly) guys in the nfl are on juice. if our coaches see maybin as being the most disruptive pass rusher, then he is a good pick at 11. if we can get our sack number up around 40 i think we will have a top 5-8 D and plenty more short fields and turnovers for our all of a sudden hard to stop O.

LOLOLOL!!!! you are the worst bills poster i've ever seen! you went on and on and on about how jp losman is good or will be good, do you remember that? hahaha. you labills, and ramius all argued with me over jp, and now you kneel.

johnsons big problem was being a china doll. he had skills and athleticism. ultimately both failed, and moulds made them both look better than they ever were, but rj did go on to win tb two critical games on their way to a superbowl, including an epic monday night win, while flutie went on a 9 game losing streak and was one lucky missed fg against the bills from an 11 game losing streak. flutie fans are sub human and i suspect most losman fans were flutie fans. flutie and rj are head and shoulders above jp, who is the worst qb to ever get 30 starts in nfl history.

maybin has super long arms, an explosive first step, and is very very quick to react off the snap. he's got the base ingredients to rush the passer. not saying he is for certain the best guy at it this draft, but i won't be mad if we get him at 11.

imo peters has sick rare talent and the tools to dominate. he is also inconsistent and gets banged up a bit. i consider the oline very important AS A UNIT, not as a collection of individual great players (like the dline is). we need a very good overall o line to dominate in the nfl. having a strong left tackle is important for that, but not crucial like having a pass rusher is on D. so we need an LT, and one is hard to get, but the best LT only does what a good LT does on the vast majority of plays, his job is to stop bad things from happening more than it is to make plays happen. so i'd be happy to sign peters IF he plays up to his talent and is consistent and plays hard. i'd also be happy to trade him for good value if we have a guy who can play there. we've had teague, gandy, jennings, williams, peters and walker as our tackles in the past few years. better blocking is always better, but it's not like peters has resulted is strikingly better (or even slightly better) O than the other guys. it's not quarterback, so it isn't an absolute, we have to look at our line as a unit, not as individuals, so keeping peters or not depends on who else we got.

bill, are you saying you would trade him for 2 late firsts, or 2 firsts and a 3rd? i think we trade him if he is going to be too hard to sign and we have a decent alternative. i don't think you need to drop a ton on a LT, a very good one helps but with blitzes being fairly common and defenders fast to stop the run, you need several good OL rather than one or two great and any scrub in the other positions.

i dunno, kelsey and denny are DEs who at times look very good, they both lack a quick first step and that's why they are sht at rushing the passer. a quick first step is for a pass rusher is like a jump shot for a swing man in basketball, it is the basis of his entire game. i am willing to overlook lots of short comings if we draft a guy who can get off the ball and cause some disruption. a healthy aaron and some kind of rotation of anyone else in our front 4 would really really help our d

we are really gonna see the kind of ability that evans has now. if owens gives us 7 in the box and two guys who warrant a double team, then our two rbs are gonna run rough shot over the nfl. one thing is we were able to run very effectively against the 3-4, but passed poorly. this could be just what we need!

how do u know it's donte?

he's a little slight, but if he gets after it i'd say that's very good for us. if we add a good passrusher (maybin!!) then that might help us out.