colin

he had a kid he didn't meet till the kid was 18!! OH NOES!!!! worse tha hitler!!

that really just says it all. we added guys to get after the passer (mitchel, ellis, johnson, stroud) and guys who can cover. yet all i read is posters saying we need more oline. we need to stop the faketriots passing attack, not get back ups just in case our best linemen go down. 3rd and 9, we need to win that mach up against the pats more than lose it. that's what we went out and got people for.

i agree about the all irish return team (lol) that will result in some serious long returns and tds. don't worry about who is 1 and who is 2, we will have guys in 3rd and long a lot (did ok at getting them there before) and need 3 and 4 guys to cover, especially against the cheatriots.

i heard that 90 of mayocks top 100 went in the first 100 picks. if that's a true number he is clearly the best talking head on tv covering the draft.

but the giants play makers made a huge diff in the last super bowl, including secondary and their big WR. and the colts won with strong secondary play and skill players. and a couple of key turnovers, including a massive end zone interception won it for the steelers. and ty law and rodney harrison made the biggest single contributions to 2 of the pats wins. you are just being way too myopic. you bill and akc started out (a couple years ago) with a very strong point, but we've put a ton of guys onto our lines (resigned our DEs, drafted ellis, mccargo, williams, signed stroud, johnson, dock, extended peters, signed walker, signed fowler, drafted butler). we also have some LBs, and now completed the trifecta with corners who can cover the 4 and 5 wide sets that have been destroying us.

NO DRAFT SCHMITT, I'VE HEARD OF HIM!!!! always nice to have a half human half bull hybrid mashing guys up late in the game.

this is honestly a bad take. the giants had a not great pass rush in 06. osi and strahan combined for the exact same number of sacks as kelsay and aaron did for the bills this season. in 06 we were top 8 or so in sacks. now we lost and now replaced secondary, an have actually upgraded our d line, adding a rook DE got mccargo healthy, stroud and johnson. we also have more linebackers who can play. you can say the giants line won it, or you can say getting more aggressive with blitzes and the like helped and was possible because of the secondary getting healthy and more talented. either way, they were crap before upgrading their secondary and so were we. now we have horses, and i think some studs, at every level of D.

is he the same mike smith who does ncaa and draft coverage? if so i like him and he seems to follow the whole thing, not just a few teams.

tim anderson, ron edwards, ed bannon, everett, mike williams, and several others were need position picks (positions that most people here say we still need players for) that everyone felt good about. they all sucked or didn't pan out and because of that we have had our problems over the years. it's not about the position as much as it is about the player. AND OUR PICKS WERE ALL FOR NEEDS TODAY ANYWAY!!

PETERS PART 2!!!!

i look at our draft and i think our team is being built to beat the pats, and i like it. we got guys up front to get after brady and stop the run. we have big aggressive physical RBs, and now we have a complete and deep secondary to cover all the packages the pats put out there. they went five wide friggen so much, do you know who we had out there? greer and kiwanuka? on gafney and swallworth and welker? now we have some guys who can glue to them, so we have the ability to match up, blitz, and dictate rather than play on our heels

guy is a combine monster. we went with the productive guy who is the best athlete. that's the kind of size strength speed pick that teams like to make late.

we are obv going balls out on D. we got our LBs and DL, now we are going secondary crazy.

we added 1 lb in FA, 1 due to health, 2 DTs and a DE. 2 corners for the secondary that gave up 5 TDs to one guy still in our division is too much?

greer was part of a secondary that let moss and co destroy us. our biggest problem last year was when we went against 4 wide the 3rd and 4th guys were wide open all day and we'd give up conversions on 3rd and long. if we have 4 guys who can cover we can stop that and blitz when WE WANT TO not when we sneak the blitz in.

likes it been said above by some solid posters: NE friggen torched us last year. we have 2 probowlers on our DL now, we've upgraded DT and DE this offseason. we've improved 2/3rds of our LBs from last season. 5 tds in one game. that's what moss did to us. we need guys who can cover because we had some chumps. if we have this now showed up we can challange NE. we can blitz 6 guys putting lbs up the A gaps in brady's face now that we have guys who can cover some. it all counts guys. i'd understand being mad if we didn't go out and sign a ton of big guys in the past 2 offseasons, but we did.

:<

a raw talented sudden guy off the edge is perfect. he will be in our rotation and come in as a spark for our passrush (like hargrove was supposed to). with aaron and co matching up against opponents lines this kid has a chance to come in beside stroud and make an impact on an over matched tired oline.

LET'S BRING THE RUCKUS!!

leodis will be a day one starting cb, see a lot of return chances, and will be our best cb by game 8.

have you guys seen the names of the wr's leodis has shut down? this kid is a monster cb. with one of our outstanding safeties over top we are going to see qb's stare down a covered guy and then get sacked.

i think this guy can be donte hall good. plays rough and makes plays with a chip on his shoulder, but isn't such a jerk. i was wanting drc, thinking no way does leodis get out of the top 10.

he got over his shoulder well. kid is raw power speed and talent -- exactly what we need. consider him a bigger more explosive less suspended hargrove. we now have 3 DEs, 3DTs, and two guys that can go inside or outside.

then he'd never get up!!

wtf conner?!??! he's a much lesser version of poz, who we have! why do you want conner?