colin

and to think we had the ball on the 10 or so. we are so so predictable.

i get the impression that our players, especially on O, are listless and are certain their coaches won't put them in a good position to win.

our only shot at this game is a big d stop/turnover here, and then a td

ugh, we deserve to lose this one. that turnover killed us, and so so appropriate for the bills. we do all the hard stuff and then just give the ball away.

my bad, i didn't notice our c ffing up that play for us. note kyle williams with a stop at the line and then a sack!! our d line aint' that bad

i thought so too. i dunno if the wind was so bad that he figured he had to go short, but a pass to the edge would have been evans and no one else's

not having a different play in in time is bad sure, but the pats just cheated and the refs let them.

i don't see how you blame our coaches for that, that's on the officials

what are the refs doing?

THANK YOU WIND!! clearly the wind has changed and is now more side to side. it blew up our fg, and killed NE's gimme right now.

you guys just parrot each other. our line is missing it's best player and isn't great at all, but when you blitz, you bring who? LINEBACKERS. they suck. they really do. linebackers are supposed to make tackles, but our d line makes way too many of our big plays against the run (like the last 3 tackles this drive, forcing the FG attempt).

our d line has made a few plays, including tackles in the back field today. they aren't great, but they don't suck. our line backers on the other hand, do suck. they are not good in coverage, and we can see today that even when they know 100% the O is running, they still don't blow up blockers or get to the hole.

all the bitching about the d line is out of place -- our linebackers suck.

lol nice hit on welker!! looks like a catch and fumble!!

considering the wind, how big is having peters and lynch out? got, lynch was born for this game today.-

i don't think jp losman worked at all close to hard. it has been mentioned by ex teammates of his that he is not a team guy. in think he is lazy and slow, and never once put in the very large amount of work required to be a good nfl starting qb, let alone make up the extra distance he was behind he curve to start. bill in nyc -- wow, i knew jp was trash (worst qb to ever get 30 starts) but i didn't think it was THAT bad. as we all know, a qb can lift an entire team, or bring one down. jp losman couldn't even just be a guy, he always brought the team down.

bill, is this (and 10 over 5) really the number? didn't he win 7 in 06 alone?

jp never put the effort in to learn the game and play well. he is a lazy bum and will make the team better by leaving it.

i don't blame them. these guys have been in football for all the time for their whole life. they are physically hurt all the time and some are prolly looking down the road and not wanting to be hurt for ever. if you don't like your boss or your coworkers, you won't be emotionally involved in your job, no matter what you do.

you didn't call him an idiot because you just didn't think the joke was good. you were trying to be rightously indignant and shine your good guy badge (some other guy did as well to be fair) showing how you were attacking the evil evil racist with his vicious horrible comment. your little attempt to protray yourself as a rugged individual is obviously false in the face of your girly pc behaviour. i'm sure you'll have a good cry and tie a ribbon to get over all the pain.

so did you call the guy an idiot because you are completely and utterly politically correct, with 14 ribbons and tears in your eyes for victims, or did you call him an idiot because you horribly ignorant?

oh no!!!! a joke, that's so terrible!!! have any of you PC cops ever seen a woody allan movie?

clearly we do well against bad Ds. hopefully we'll see more against NE on sunday. I do think we need one more play maker on O to really get things going.

peters will want like 9 a year. i think if we don't sign peters, we will have a solid shot at 1 signing a peppers type guy on D 2 signing a winslow type guy on O 3 keep peters for another season before ultimately trading him anyway. OR 4 trading him for something BIG. the problem with LTs is that since your O line doesn't make plays, there isn't that much of a difference in how good your team is with a good LT vs a great LT compared to the cost. if they think bell will be a stud in his 3rd year, peters will not be re upped, and will be just traded next year.

bill, i totally agree!! oh, did u notice we won with ur boi on the bench, and our secondary came up with big plays?!!? go bills!!