colin

who was it that said they expect bad o? correct so far

bad

imo when we attack on D from the linebacker position we do well, when we have them read too much we aren't good.

and they did it well!!

gb has such an efficient O

i will say that was a bit of a late ball on trent, and evans didn't go back hard enough for it. let's hope its all learning in pre season

NON CALL!!

good push on 3rd followed by a blown run

good push!

lets see the d and passing game go!

you characterized our qb play in wins as sloppy. that's simply not the case. our red zone O is not good tho, but those are two different things. ah, you're just trolling anyway. enjoy your patriots this season.

it really was a horrible black mark on us last year. we need to become the 3-4 busting team on O to make the playoffs this year, and with san diego, NE, pittz, and balti being tough teams likely to get a good look at the playoffs (not to mention the other teams in our division) we can't emphasize enough how focused on the 3-4 we need to be.

the OP's incorrect assessment of qb in wins aside, we need more TDs particularly in the red zone. i think the TO evans mix will extend drives and with Hardy, to, evans, and nelson in deep along w lynch we should have a much much better red zone td ratio, maybe top 5 or 10 instead of bottom 5 or 10. that alone will be enough for us to get to the playoffs

he and the bills were also good in tackles behind the LOS. don't bother bringing up facts tho, the self loathers on here will always say aaron and any long time bill sucks and were never good.

i like the intent of this line, but the delivery takes a lot out of the punch. saying he's never sniffed anything but a jock strap is a comment about what he's sniffed -- not what he's played. it is neither sufficient or necessary to imply he's not an athlete (i.e. sniffing other things than a jock strap doesn't make one an athlete, and having sniffed a jock doesn't mean the guy isn't an athlete). I suggest a line more like "the closest he has ever been to football is sniffing a jock strap" or "never got closer to starting any football game than sniffing a jock strap".

i'd agree except for the fact that pennington out played him.

the cover 2 is designed to force bad 3rd downs and be good at stopping the 3rd down, as well as stopping big plays (helping both). the corner stats in the cover two will tend to be favorable (barber is just old and overated, like his brother always was). i think we will keep mcgee, we extended him once and will likely do so again. our mccoverage will be beastly if we get a bit more of a rush up front.

could a woman really be mayor? hahaha

besides your mouth's desire to service a fat borderline retard of a turnstile at LT, do you actually have anything to contribute to this? I called Peter's low motivation and inconsistent play over a year ago, and just like when i called JP sucking the bag. plenty of nut scrubbers like yourself tried to get glory taking me on, but just ended up at the glory hole. enjoy your sausage.

peters is the dave boston of tackles. sick talent but no heart and no head -- couple good years and then will fade away at a huge salary. the peter's nut huggers bother me tho -- they are such chubby chasing oline fetishists that they actually think a fat lazy left tackle is more important than a top flight WR and 2 very good Oline (what peters costs). these pudgy kids still don't actually make the plays and need to be consistent and nasty, not gifted athletes with motivational problems. fkc peters and GO BILLS

which i honestly think is why we got our three new interior linemen -- screen passes are better than check downs and stop the pass rush. if we pass just half of those times as screens, we will get some big yards 1

which i honestly think is why we got our three new interior linemen -- screen passes are better than check downs and stop the pass rush. if we pass just half of those times as screens, we will get some big yards 1

exactly. they gave up nothign to the first stringers who were amped up and wanted blood. they didn't play that well overall, but they did OK. zona's line never played more than OK for 3 quarters in a game last year and they moved the ball pretty well. one thing i did like was the screen plays we ran. those will be key against 34 Ds. lynch is only gonna miss one game against a 34 D (and NE at that :<) so between him and evans over the top TO all over i think our passing stats will be up a bunch, not in small part due to our more mobile and smarter line.

tenn has unchained beasts on their line and their DC has a rep as a cheap dirty bastard. it did seem like they were up in the grill all night and it is a good thing to have our young guns beat up on a bit. we want them in a hightened state of mind when we go into NE week 1

if he played the whole game, how many catches would TO have had? 15? i think we might be getting a little ahead of ourselves here.