SectionC3

But do you multitask?

I’m glad you took a break from reviewing cartoons to share your wisdom. Hoax.

He kept Spector instead of Hodgins. And this year there’s a good chance he’s going to cut Spector. Oops. (And Hodgins isn’t Kumerow. But he’s a much more functional receiver than Kumerow, and that piece obviously was lacking around the time we brought Brown and Beasley back last year.)

You guys spend a lot of time focused on “T” issues instead of worrying about, you know, things that are problems. Weird. Kind of sick. But whatever. It’s MAGA.

Hoax. Both are probably true.

Hoax. I wish this was true. Maybe it is. Unfortunately a large segment of our population is brainwashed by garbage they read on 4-chan and Twitter.

Sadly, if he's a Trumper, probably opioids. (I have to say I don't disagree with him about the part about Trump not being a Republican. Trump isn't an independent, either--he's simply a Trumper, and all about himself. Sadly, the Republicans became Trumpers, and now the two things are indistinguishable.)

Working at TE and FB and on ST? Absolutely.

I'll start with Tommy Tuberville and Roger Marshall.

Allen’s love life is none of our business. I don’t care who makes him happy. But I have to say that, based on what little birdies around here say, it’s much better that Britt Will is gone.

Lady G. I forgot about that. Nothing wrong with his choices. It’s his life, and I hope he’s happy. In the meantime, it’s time for his colleagues to stop picking on gay people. And maybe for him to stand up for gay people.

Hoax. Lay off the ivermectin.

You still didn’t explain why you love Trump. Maybe it’s because he shares your warped views on HCQ. Whatever. It doesn’t matter. You love him.

This makes sense to me. The question, believe it or not, was not satirical. Following Trump's rise, I have no idea what it means to be conservative in this country. I cannot believe that traditional conservatives countenance his nonsense. Young conservatives seem to be social conservative and economic . . . maybe super progressives. Like that Big Blitz guy who somehow thinks that conservatism entails the government interceding to freeze prices to stop inflation.

What, dare I ask, are conservative family values? If we're going to focus on the seven deadly sins instead, it seems like Trump is beyond the superfecta there. Pride, greed, lust, envy, gluttony, wrath, and sloth. I guess that's what passes for conservative family values these days.

She's clean. She'll serve the term, unless we have a different Democratic president elected in 2024 who wants to put her into a Cabinet position (which I doubt will happen).

You gotta wrangle snakes to survive as governor of NYS. Dealing with the NYC crowd is not for the faint of heart. Raccuia acted like a jerk, and it never occurred to him that the person coughing up $600m in public money might ask for a sweetener at the end. The sweetener, of course, was his head on a platter. So for all of the talk about her being weak and wimpy and whatnot, don't forget about the significant change that she was pretty cold-blooded in taking this guy down at the end of the process.

Had time to type that "witty" response but not time to answer, I see. I love my country, too. A lot. I'm blessed and lucky to be here. It's why I stand against Trumpism.

That’s your opinion. She got there from Hamburg. You didn’t. Neither did “Bob Jones,” of “nearly almost came close to getting and MPA” fame.

Thanks for the insight. Hoax. I don’t have enough time to explain how clueless this is. Bottom line: an indictment is based upon legally sufficient evidence. It’s the same standard that applies at trial. And away we go.

And yet she was smart enough to be elected governor.

Him dying before Justice is served would be horrible. And, I agree with the earlier comment about revoking pre trial release. Almost anyone else under this set of circumstances would have to post significant bail. You unwittingly spoke against Trump. The threshold to indict is legally sufficient evidence to support a conviction. Same standard applies at trial. The indictment, as you acknowledge, reflects that the grand jury believes that there is legally sufficient evidence to support a conviction. Your anecdotal experience informs your view that there is significant — legally sufficient — evidence that trump committed the crimes alleged.

Stuff happened.

I’m treating that as a one-off. Crazy stuff happened before that game. FWIW.

Hoax.