SectionC3

Fake news. Maybe you can be bunker buddies with Trump if you're lucky enough. You can both cower from snowflakes down there!

Hey, even if he's in the basement, he's still four floors above the "leader" who's hiding from snowflakes and reminiscing about the days when he could bang porn stars!

Truth hurts, eh? I like presidents who lead from the front and who don't hide in the bunker when things get a little dicey outside.

Are we on keep America great right now, or has he reverted to make america great again? I can't keep his lies straight anymore. I know. What a snowflake As a matter of fact, in view of recently-received information, I have no choice but to place Albwan on the Snowflake List. Congratulations, Albwan!

You'd think, but at least in NYS it's very, very difficult to prove. Normally not applied in one-on-one situations. All that said, I see this as a depraved indifference case based what we currently know. I would have charged it the same as did the prosecutor.

Truth hurts, big boy. Also, I like presidents who lead from the front. Not fake tough guy, morbidly obese presidents who cower in bunkers when the snowflakes get restless.

That's a clip. Not a recording of the entirety of the call.

Hoax.

If it's anything like the Ukraine transcript, it will be chock full of omissions and ellipses.

“Tough as anyone” to occupy the oval is what you said. So in your view he’s tied for toughest president ever. That is absurd. EDIT: Drudge (as of 12:28p eastern) is just killing Trump. Rightfully so. The fearful leader hid in a bunker last night because a bunch of "snowflakes" were in Lafayette Park. That's right. Instead of leading from the front, the big tough guy was five stories below ground level in a biometrically-protected room. And today he's followed it up by staying ensconced in the White House and hurling insults on a governors conference call. He's not only a loser and unfit for yet another crisis, he's a wimp.

Sunshine good. OAN bad. Enjoy the sun!

I’m not a member of Antifa. Nor do I support it in any way. Think about that while you slurp down OAN, sir.

Fake news. You lap that stuff up.

I didn’t realize that we were talking about that. Last I checked you suggested filing frivolous lawsuits against municipalities. It was a dumb idea then, and it’s a dumb idea now, a few minutes later.

Sounds like a plan. Maybe the next time it gets cold they can light some money on fire to get heat, too. Both plans are equally wasteful.

Hoax. I’ve never said anything of the sort. You’re the only one who has mentioned Antifa. Too much time watching Fox News and OAN for your, sir.

Yup. And this idea that business owners and those who have been damaged as a result of the violence shouldn’t get what they paid for is just one more nutty thing in a nutty time. I’ve been out of the coverage game for awhile, but I suspect that social unrest is an issue with respect to business interruption policies only insofar as unrest that shutters a business won’t trigger coverage (or will trigger an exception), whereas interruption occasioned by physical damage would be covered.

Well said. Nobody complained when they accepted the premiums. If the policy covers the loss, then it should pay. Not debatable.

Fake news. Nobody said anything about heavy-handed. A person can lead without being heavy-handed. Unfortunately the current occupant of the White House can’t do so. Sadly, you continue to support that person. I, on the other hand, demand better. I’m sorry that your standards are so low.

Hoax. My dream president is one who, as of 9:37 eastern time this morning, hadn’t used his five tweets to communicate solely with respect to his re-election prospects and to explore political grudges. The next time he shows that he cares more about this country than himself will be the first. Enjoy your loser leader, sir. I demand better.

That makes sense. Destroy the insurance policy (assuming it covers the loss) for political reasons.

I can’t read the whole thing. It looks like it’s only a complaint. Is the complaint verified? Probably not. If not, then you’re looking only at allegations, not sworn statements (like you’d see in an affidavit). Don’t put too much stock in this.

Hoax. That was a legal discussion. This is a political and social discussion. Also, you should keep an eye on the name-calling, sir. It’s unbecoming. Be better!

I live in the real world in which curfews are an imperfect but suitable solution that allows the disaffected to be heard and reduces the ability of instigators to blend in with protestors under the cover of dark.

Daily and relentless accessibility? For awhile, yes. But then he stopped the pressers because he’s a bozo and kept putting his foot in his mouth. And lest we forget, he diddled around on the pandemic in January, and in February, and was trying to wish it away in March. If that’s good enough for you, that’s on you. I demand better leadership, be it Republican or Democrat . This loser is not up to the job. You’ve comingled the “toughness” point with the “job performance” point. You’ve called Donald Trump the toughest president in United States history. Even you have to know how laughable that is. Despite being the “healthiest president ever” or whatever lie it is he told in that regard, he wasn’t healthy enough to join his fellow patriots and serve in VietNam. Putting that aside, maybe he could get away from the fridge in the White House and, you know, go to Minneapolis and meet with black ministers. Act like he feels some pain. Or maybe just be tough enough to not to respond on Twitter to whatever mild insult he might face today. Whatever the tough guy chooses is fine with me.