Tortured Soul

That is more like it: http://www.buffalonews.com/city/article268548.ece

That's 1/227 of what he paid Shawn Merriman.

I know it's tempting to think this, but we do this every year. Remember New England last year? Or Dallas in 2007? This team always plays hard, always out-efforts more talented teams, and always finds a new and imaginative way to come up short.

A little OT, but what's the big deal with Slash? He kind of sucked. He has a 70.7 career rating and seven more INTs than TDs for his career. And the one year he didn't suck was 2001 - when he had Mike Mularkey as his offensive coordinator and Tom Clements as his QB coach.

Any word on when it will be back up?

Wow, that's not much of a difference.

How is this different than Toronto?

Pretty impressive. Even Jesus only rose from the dead once.

I still don't see what has changed since the Mort report. And Goodell doesn't contradict him.

The second article is less than a month old. And what, specifically, has changed since those articles were written?

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2009/12/20/mort-no-rookie-wage-scale-until-2012/ http://www.buffalonews.com/sports/article220231.ece

Yup, and go their opponents!

And Nate Clements. And Willis McGahee, with the Ravens. But what were you saying?

Buffalo: 74-55 Carolina: 74-56 Dallas: 73-57 These records include all opponents on the schedule, not just the ones played so far. Point is, one Bills win will not necessarily cost the team a shot at the top pick, even if Carolina loses out.

Whitner can void the final year of his contract.

truly another point of view

No he hasn't. No GM would ever talk about a college player, let alone an underclassman, during the season.

My biggest worry in the scenario. I don't think they win another game this year.

Mort and Schefter were the two who picked the Bills over the Fish.

I think this is more-or-less true, but I don't see that fitting either answer of your poll question.

1995 wildcard round: Buffalo 37, Miami 22.

So how did Gailey not see this initially? I still don't understand that.

I thought he played poorly against GB, but I'm not really disagreeing with you. I think he will continue to get better.

There will still be bad days ahead, but Bell will continue to improve. He's still very new to this game.

http://sports.espn.go.com/ncf/news/story?id=5673405 I think it's interesting because this makes him almost a lock to declare for the draft in a year when there probably won't be too many underclassmen coming out. That, and the ESPN bobbleheads have him as the top pass rushing prospect at a position we could definitely use help at. I've never seen him play myself. Anyone want to weigh in on his on-field performance?