dave mcbride

Not the Pats. Brady threw a TD pass with 2:15 to go and with the Pats up 37-0.

Agreed. If they had a reasonable number of decent players on defense, they may well have pulled that game out because the scheming was good. Luckily for the Bills, their defensive talent is awful.

The other thing about yesterday: Allen, who had 7 INTs through 5 games, didn't throw a pass that came remotely close to getting picked. Miami has one pick on the season and has given up 16 TD passes. Man, their pass D is terrible.

This is NOT in any way a criticism of Josh Allen!! However, when your best defensive performance is a QB with a 91.4 rating through 6 games, your pass defense is abjectly terrible. Indeed, Miami's team defensive passer rating is 127.9, which I think is probably the worst in league history.

He's a terrific player.

The Bills have to play the AFC West next season, and Denver seems like a good next landing spot for Fitz. Don't rule that out!

That's true, and I should have mentioned that. Still, playing against Seattle in Seattle in a rainstorm is not an easy task.

I thought he came through big time yesterday when it counted too, but one of the reasons he's not sniffing 300 yards is that he's been incapable of throwing an accurate deep ball all season. That has to change. It's one of the most basic skills requirements of even a replacement-level NFL QB.

I don't really pay attention to them, to be honest. Bear in mind that I have been on this site for years beating the drum that the traditional team passer rating differential is the most accurate predictor of success (outside of points scored differential!) that exists.

Who here actually said that? I certainly didn't. Read what I wrote (and I'm the only one who brought this issue up, and related it specifically to Jackson).

The Ravens are 11-3 when he starts, and he has a QB rating of 89.9 plus nearly 1,300 yards rushing and 8 TDs in 14 games. At some point, the preconceived narrative has to shift in the face of actual evidence that cuts against it.

No he wouldn't, because the Bills would have put up 30 points against a very good team in a very difficult place to play during a rainstorm. Plus he would have rushed for 116 yards on 14 carries. Maybe some would have criticized him for "not playing like a QB," but that's a very limiting prism through which to evaluate a QB's overall contribution. Please explain your laugh remark too. Do you think Jackson played poorly? Did you watch the game? I did. Allen played quite well yesterday himself, and really bounced back in the second half after a bad first half.

Passer rating is a poor way to evaluate Jackson right now. He played really well yesterday.

Absolutely correct. https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/why-fivethirtyeight-gave-trump-a-better-chance-than-almost-anyone-else/

I get that. Do watch it again. Typical of his overthrows this season — no air under it and gives his receivers no chance.

Who actually here said it was Allen’s fault?

I watched it twice. It was bad announcing by lofton and it wasn’t even close anyway. Bottom line—Allen is playing like crap today so far

Just no. Watch the replay.

That’s ridiculous. It was a bad throw and wasn’t close.

It was routine and bad luck.

26 TDs is more touchdown passes than any Bills QB has thrown since 1991.

My bad. I had heard that, but it looks like he was actually fine. Scroll down: https://www.newsday.com/sports/football/jets/sam-darnold-mono-1.36204301

Halftime shows. Marching bands.

I dunno. Riveron is the guy making the decisions. It maybe that Goodell is supportive, but it starts with Riveron. Always remember that the owners - Goodell's bosses - voted for this rule! I think they should simply get rid of the option given how badly this is playing out. That won't happen until next year at the earliest, of course.

Sean McDermott, I hope you're reading this: never challenge a PI/non-PI call for the rest of the season. I know you succeeded in week one, but literally NOTHING is being overturned now -- even blatantly obvious stuff. It is really unbelievable.