Jump to content

ndirish1978

Community Member
  • Posts

    8,263
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by ndirish1978

  1. VIVA RON MEXICO
  2. hey i enjoy dumping on TD! If we didnt do that we'd ust have everyone agreeing here!
  3. Peters is huge, athletic and fast, i dunno why you knock the decision. just cause a guy was undrafted doesnt mean he's not good, it just means the scouts didnt know where to put him. He's a good player and we saw him motor in Special teams, and make big plays, Im excited. If McNally says he can do it, I believe him. With the addition of a good TE and WR, I can see our offense being WIDE open next year.
  4. I posted the same question in like 3 threads. The onyl thing i can tihnk of is that we're gonna run a MUCH more open offense this year and use parish like the Steelers used Randle El.
  5. mile high your mock is wrong, why would you advertise something that makes you look dumb?
  6. um, Mr Larry is a damn liar. We just took Parrish
  7. here is my frustration. Barnes was there, I dunno if we tried to trade up for him or not, so thats moot. But, Miller, Terry and Hawthorne were all around, why not take a player we NEED because I havent seen anyone who rates Parrish as a better value PLUS, we NEED DL and OL. Dont get me wrong, I will be a big Parrish fan especially when we start playing more open sets and I know mularkey used 3 wrs well cause look at ward, randle el and burress, but it just feels like we had greater needs elsewhere. Hope Im proven wrong.
  8. yes the NO trade for Travis was garbage, I hate the guy after his comments and i want him gone. Although I know all the bs wil be spewed at me about getting "value" in a trade. At this point I would rather have shelton than nothing. Now we dont have a LT, a dsigruntled rb and the Cards got arrington
  9. our new philosphy is drafting special teams I guess. JK I think Parrish is the answer for our 3rd wr. Problem is, we still need better STARTING OL and DL
  10. he's the only guy that has nothing to do today, he needs to work on his game. BTW Holt came in his 1st year and got seated at the table, Jansen is an @sclown
  11. BOOOOOO, dont disagree with me, my opinion is all I care about
  12. I dont see Baas being there for our pick. Do something TD!!!!
  13. Cardinals may take Arrington in the 2nd, who i think is an awesome player
  14. I like him but they have kept saying theyre happy with our TE's. Mularkey doesnt use TE's as receievers much.
  15. Bills | Brown Signed - from www.KFFL.com Sat, 23 Apr 2005 11:04:44 -0700 Updating a previous report, the Associated Press reports the Buffalo Bills have signed free agent DT LaWaylon Brown (Vikings). Terms of the deal were undisclosed. Bills | Thomas Re-Signed - from www.KFFL.com Sat, 23 Apr 2005 09:16:32 -0700 The Buffalo Bills have re-signed restricted free agent CB Kevin Thomas. Terms of the deal were undisclosed.
  16. makes it more likely they trade up for edwards? Yes
  17. tre thomas? never gonna happen
  18. the best player to replace clements is clements. trade talks are retarded
  19. how do you say- "no chance in hell"
  20. so sad. There is a $50 "shipping and handling" charge. Just how much "handling does that involve? Hooker
  21. yes, with the offense a the hands of a rookie QB the logical move is to weaken our defense and completely blow things (sarcasm)
  22. no DT with the 2nd rd pick. Youre right about a 2nd rder not contributing more than anderson/edwards, dont forget the development of Sape. we go OL of CB
  23. skins will trade 2 1st rounders to get edwards with the phins pick
×
×
  • Create New...