
Ed_Formerly_of_Roch
Community Member-
Posts
9,965 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Gallery
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by Ed_Formerly_of_Roch
-
SU Hoops 2013-2014 edition...
Ed_Formerly_of_Roch replied to bills44's topic in Off the Wall Archives
I'll see your poster boy and raise you one. To me the ultimate flop was Donte Green. I think he was even a bigger flop. -
places to eat & see in Buffalo? (coming to KC game)
Ed_Formerly_of_Roch replied to Rockee96's topic in Off the Wall Archives
Hot Dog Ted's Andersen's is a good place for a Beef on Weck, nothing fancy there I live in NC now myself so do miss good wings, they all suck down here! -
Why did the Bills cut their roster to 50 ?
Ed_Formerly_of_Roch replied to MAGIC MAN's topic in The Stadium Wall Archives
Why, out of the 53 they can only activate what is it 45 or 47?? Later on in the season as people get hurt, the extra bodies come in handy, but if you know right now today, baring an injury this week in practice who the 45 are that are going to be active on Sunday, why bother adding a couple more players only to be in-active. Likely even the most seasoned vet they sign today would be questionable whether they activate him by Sunday anyway, So as others have pointed out, wait until after first game to add a couple more and see what injuries may happen. I do recall the Lawyer Milloy signing, but unless there's a player out there at that level, he likely wouldn't play anyway this coming Sunday. -
2013 Bills Practice Squad
Ed_Formerly_of_Roch replied to 26CornerBlitz's topic in The Stadium Wall Archives
So has Rogers been signed by anyone?? -
Update us on how you make out with Center Ice. Likely if you had waited the two weeks and called then for both ST and Center Ice you'd have got it, but now that you signed the one year contract, the leverage shifts back to them. I made a similar mistake a year ago, once they had my "money" much less generious on the offers.
-
Not quite that simple, the latest CBA requires something like a 25% increase to any player franchised in consecutive years t ostop teams from doing this. Basically they are saying you have one year to work it out or move on. The amount was even in the paper the other day and stated that because of this big amount it's not likely he'd get tagged again. So either you sign him long term, trade him, or the Bill's are content with him walking.
-
You must be referring to the Bill's games!! NFL could be using Google just to bid up what DTV offers, will it work, who knows?? I would not be happy if it went back to cable as doubt you'd get all the offers that you get from DTV. To me that's the biggest difference between the two, when cable offers you a deal, they give you $10 off, when DTV gives you a deal they'll knock of $50. Can't see why cable would offer a big amount of money to outbid Google as they can let Google have it, then start charging big premiums for downloading the stream. You can buy a bluRay player or a Roku for $60 to stream the games, that's like one months of cable/DTV bill
-
EJ hurt knee according to BB.com
Ed_Formerly_of_Roch replied to Kemp2Warlick's topic in The Stadium Wall Archives
Well the good news is over the next two weeks or so, likely will get a much better idea on Jeff Tuel's abilities which likely could be a good thing. He won't be playing against 3rd stringers at least 2nd and maybe some 1st teams. While I agree EJ has looked very good for a rookie and likely would have started as was pointed out, it's unlikely the Bill's were going to the super bowl this season or even the playoffs, So sitting a watching a couple of weeks may not be a terrible thing either. In situations like this you sometimes can learn more from watching, viewing real game tape and practicing more. Yes I know there have been more rookie QB's coming in right away and playing well, three of note last year were Wilson, RG3, and Luck. In all three cases though I do think the team around him was a little better than what we have here so again easier to look good. -
I suppose you could take a chance, if EJ is going to be the starter, sit Kolb down, tell him EJ is the starter, you're making too much to be the backup. You got your signing bonus, now we want to renego your contract. Or tell him, we're cutting you, but will bring you back again with a reduced contract. The Bill''s are taking a chance someone else may sign him, but they may be willing to take risk. I think the Bill's would like him around, but maybe at less money if he's the backup.
-
Here's one other thought, the broadcast teams need to learn they can't keep showing replays during Bills games as too often you'll be missing the next play. How many times today did that happen, half dozen maybe?? PS I was watching on NFL network, not sure if Western NY got that feed or another local one??
-
Changed Expectations for this season?
Ed_Formerly_of_Roch replied to Reed83HOF's topic in The Stadium Wall Archives
Assuming EJ becomes the starter and Tuell is a decent backup, you want a vet presence that the two rookies can go to. Unless you can find someone with ample experience, comes much cheaper, and would somehow know the offense, I'd think you keep him just to help EJ develop. I think his presence off the field may be needed more than on the field -
Last year SJ, this year Byrd and Levitre
Ed_Formerly_of_Roch replied to zazie's topic in The Stadium Wall Archives
And you know this how?? Do you have inside information?? I'm assuming no, and that your rational for your statement is that you didn't hear any stories about the Bill's making offers. OK fair argument, but also fair to say that in most cases rarely do teams make statements either way, about progress or lack there of. Most often the leaks come from agents trying to push something. The other reasonable argument is there's no sense making an offer when miles apart. Maybe the Bill's did make an intial offer was countered with something still miles apart, so the Bill's figured wait until he either comes down in price to what they felt was a reasonable amount, or if he can get that amount of money, great for him, but we're not over paying. It's kind of like when buying a house, there are a number of houses in the neighborhood selling for say $200k. There's one house you saw, it's a little nicer than the others, maybe worth $215 or so, but the owner is asking for like $260. so you offer $210, hoping that if they were to come back at say $225, you're close and can probably work it out. But instead, they come back with $255. At that point, you probably put them on ignore and move on, maybe hoping they will get reasonable, but you're not going to overpay either. You also don't know what he asked from the Bill's, what they countered with and compare that against what he eventually signed for. Teams will never let that out, but would be interesting to see. But when you have a coach that knows he has to win that year or likely be fired, you roll the dice and keep the players. Going into training camp last year with the off-season moves they made, it was a reasonable argument that the Bill's may have made the playoffs or at least had been in the mix, so again you don't trade players like AL when you as a team think you are close to making playoffs for draft picks which is likely the best thing you'd get as opposed to players. Assuming Al wanted out of Buffalo as was tired of the losing, all of a sudden you make the playoffs or come real close, maybe you demands drop as you decide staying here may be a good thing as the team appears to have turned the corner. That could also support the argument that he made a crazy high offer figuring Buffalo wouldn't agree, he plays out the year and see how the team does. If they do well, his price comes down to a reasonable amount and resigns, if not then easy to move on. -
Phil Mickelson Drops by Bills Camp
Ed_Formerly_of_Roch replied to jack_spikes's topic in The Stadium Wall Archives
Hell he barely had time to register. -
So here I am down in North Carolina and not anyplace to go for decent wings. That is one thing I miss from up there. I also miss Ted's and Andersons
-
Will it work with TWC, sure the difference though is TWC may offer you a 5% discount where as DTV may give you a 75% discount or even more. I'm guessing that DTV has figured out once you've gone to satelite, likely you're house is still wired for cable so very easy to go back so they bend over backawards t omake sure you don't leave. If you never had satelite service more of a hassle getting it the first time, where to locate dish relative ot where TV's are located can sometimes be dificult. (I will not let DTV run cables on the outside of my house) So TWC tends to view themselves as the only game in town and in some respects is true, so they won't give as great deals. The biggest issue I have with TWC is the rental price of their equipment, and not nearly as good. $20 a month for TWC whole house DVR and that only give you a recorder with two tuners and can handle around 20 hours of HD
-
I'm watching hope Christian Ponder makes it as a QB as working in the media don't think he has much future. Interviewing the coach of Florida International and his wife who BTW is a model if you recall. Christian implies being in LA, all she must have done was gone shopping.
-
So after calling the other night, being a hold for 45 minutes, best offer I got was $180 for ST max, so canceled the other night. So called back today, got offered $148 for ST Max, plus asked for a mini Genie which I wanted. To the above post the Mini Genie is used if you have a second outlet/TV it gives full DVR function and the ability to pause or rewind live TV whereas currently I had a HD receiver on the 2nd TV so couldn't rewind etc and there's also some limitations in the recording process like deleting or recording a series. The mini should be better I hope! I did have to agree to a new two year commitment which extended my contact by around 15 months longer than I originally had so for doing that they also gave me a $20 credit for 12 months and a $15 credit for 15 months. She then offered instead of sending me the mini Genie she'd send me another HD DVR which is better as the mini uses one of the five tuners in the Genie, so now instead will have a total of seven tuners in the house and an extra 20 hours of recording space or so. I'm guessing the mini's are in high demand so she'd prefer sending me the DVR. I often was using four of the Genie tuners at once, so this will assure I never run out of tuners. Probably could have maybe got something better, but I'm happy with this. At least until next summer when I have to do this all over again! I do think dealing with these guys can sometimes be more aggravating than buying a car! I hate this game of playing "Lets make a deal"!! PS Does anyone know what the recording capacity of the HD DVR is, assuming all HD recordings??
-
I called and after going back and forth three times, she offered me that too $180 for the max, but I turned it down, told her I'm interested but much cheaper. She said OK I'll note that on your record "want it a little cheaper" to which I repleid, no I said I want it alot cheaper. So as of now I've canceled it will see what happens. When I first called I immediately spoke the word cancel service, not sure if that took me to the retention department or not, was I still speaking with the first line of people? So am wondering, will they call me back to try and get me to subscribe or is it on me to contact them again? What I'd like is somewhere between $100 to $150 and a mini Genie thrown in. Will see what happens. Why do I seem to alwasys get the hard asses on the phone when I call who don't offer much. I'm in year two of original contract, so am still getting some discounts, which supposedly makes them less likely to offer more, but also am still under contract, so can't totally dump them either. Probably I'm not in the best bargining position overall.
-
To me this is the most blatant attempt at trying to win votes from people. You can't change the rules after the fact. You want to make that a new law, from now on if you take money, no blackouts, great, I have no problem with that. But when the state handed RW and other owners the checks, there weren't any conditions related to blackouts, so now after he has the money, you want to add rules retroactive. So who thinks if the when the state handed RW the check and if they had told him no more blackouts, he would have accepted it. Even if he wanted to to, the league would have prevented it. More than likely he would have handed the check back and said I'll call you from LA. Do I like blackouts, no, is it fair, probably not, but suggesting to change the rules after the fact is a joke. I hope for his sake he stays in politics a long time as I'd hate to see him practicing on the outside. I recall around 15 years ago, a state senator from Rochester, Dollenger I think it was was pushing the same point. He was on the Bob Matthews show talking about it, funny it was an election year too. I called up afterwards and said the same thing now, you can't change the rules after giving them the money. In May, the 2008 presidential nominee introduced a bill that would prohibit the league from blacking out games in markets in which teams have used public financing for stadium construction. "I think that's outrageous," McCain testified May 14 during a Senate subcommittee hearing. "Now, if that stadium is not taxpayer-financed, then that owner can do anything they want to. But if the taxpayers paid for them then, by God, I think the taxpayers ought to be able to see the game whether they sell out the stadium or not."
-
I've said it for a long time, with the speed, size, and complexity of the game these days, all teams need Stepford QB's If nothing else it would likely increase viewership among the women.
-
Looking at the pictures I think she could use some more development. Not bad looking though, if I were forced to, I wouldn't say no. All things considered it is pretty amazing step for a woman. I can women refs in basketball as girls play basketball as there are women's hockey leagues to play in, baseball/softball very similar sports. But football, that's a pretty big leap for a woman to be involved with.