Jump to content

Ramius

Community Member
  • Posts

    14,579
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Ramius

  1. No, your arguement has absolutely zero statictical value and holds no water. Once again, you are working with discrete variables, and trying to justify a continuous variable arguement. You do realize, dont you, that your die example is equivalent to saying that if i put all the letters in the alphabet in a hat and randomly pick 1 out, that the average letter will be M? Actually, using your ass backwards logic, since there are 26 potential values, the average value of the letter you pick will be M.5, and picking other letters will mean there is error in your sample. Hopefully now you understand how ridiculously stupid you sound.
  2. Exactly. We didnt have psp, and since you couldnt get porn from the nintendo or sega master system, we relied on someone swiping a playboy fomr the old man. Then said magzines would be taken and stored in a safe location (aka the fort out in the woods)
  3. Fixed your hypertext markup.
  4. Honestly, i think that regardless of the outcome of the ohio-St. michigan game, the national title should be a rematch. I hate, i mean i !@#$ing HATE the wolverines with a passion. But i think that if they run the table, then only lose to the #1 team, why should they be punished. As for rutgers, they are a good team, but even with a win over WV, they dont deserve the title game. a BCS game, sure (they will get embarrassed), btu not the title game.
  5. Oh. My. God. Please, please someone tell me that holcombs arm didnt just post. please tell me that i am completely sh-- faced and imagining that he claimed that rolling a die has an expected roll of 3.5, and that there is ERROR involved in rtolling a die. Holy sh--. How does someone this !@#$ing stupid actually manage to log onto the intertubes on a daily basis? Lets see, we now cna add discrete and continuous variables to the growing list of things HA has no !@#$ing clue about. Rolling a die has no error !@#$tard! Its a simple probability of discrete values. The die does not have a true average roll! you roll the die and get a number from 1-6. Theres a 1/6 chance of any given number. The next time you roll the die, the probabilities are the same. There is going to be no "regression" using a die roll. What a knumbknuts! Just because you roll a 6 once on a die doesnt make it more likely that you are going to roll a low number the next time. A die does not have an average roll value. You're the (*^*&%^$^#at the casino that would watch a coin land heads up 50 times in a row, and then bet your life savings on tails with the next flip, thinking that the probability of it coming up tails is somehow greater on the next flip. but keep on smacking your head against the wall. And please, please, PM me when you roll 3.5 on your die.
  6. I was thinking the same thing. If you can get arrested for harassing your girlfriend, then i know a lot of people in some deep deep sh--.
  7. No, she just got lucky on the IQ test.
  8. I wouldnt recommend iPod technology for the shuttle. The last thing they need is to hit the wrong button, and automatically shuffle the re-entry sequence.
  9. ugh. 25 year old male mind thats constantly in the gutter + the above sentence = one bad mental image
  10. Mewelde Moore says Jp sucks too, and aside from a few posters on here, Moore is the top NFL talent scout ever. Mewelde was the one who told the patriots to draft tom brady in the 6th round.
  11. I also find it kinda funny that JP "visited" tulane during the end of august in 2005, and was seen by a levee with dynamite right after katrina "missed" new orleans.
  12. I guess you are right. it pisses me off to think that we may have been able to make a run to the super bowl, but losman didnt stay in his lane and allowed dyson to return the throwback for a TD. And maybe is losman didnt give up all those 3rd down conversions, our offense would have the ball more this year. I also heard, and this is strictly a rumor, but it was JP Losman that designed the Sabres' new logo.
  13. agreed. He disporves himself as well. In 16 starts under various morons, losman has 2700 yrds, 15 TD, and 15 int. sounds like a typical 1st/2nd year starting QB to me. But for some reason, everyone claims losman sucks more than anyone, and he is arguably the worst starting in the history of the NFL ever. I apologize for allowing coherent logic to be included in my post. i know it isnt accepted well around these parts.
  14. louisville will win, but i am holding out hope for rutgers. why? a rutgers win would all but assure a better 1-loss team will make it into the national championship, instead of an undefeated, but undeserving louisville team.
  15. Good call. i thought A-train was nothing but a washed up scrub Jauron crony. Now he's the savior.
  16. The second Willis McGahee is gone and A-train is the starter is the second the "A-train sucks" crowd will come out.
  17. what the !@#$ is a coup dee taugh?
  18. If they move to santa clara, this matters about as much as our A's moving to Fremont. Its a move 20 miles down the road, but people feak, because they wont be within city limits anymore.
  19. after 18 pages, what makes you think that captain (*^*&%^$^#is going to listen now? I'll give him credit tho, he manages to change his arguement and his parameters with every other post.
  20. That article screams of holcombs arm logic. Lets see... pregnancy causes change in hormone levels an abortion will subsequently cause changes in hormone levels hormones may have an effect on breat cancer AHA! abortions cause breast cancer! what a crock of sh--.
  21. Once again, it all falls on your definition of when life starts. No one should have a baby forced on them. And i find it hard to see the equivalent between someone who hacks apart another human and someone who has a clump of cells removed form them after a rape. Also, your link between abortions and breast cancer? complete and utter bull sh--.
  22. One would think, after 5 years registered, that you;d at least be a halfway decent poster with a rational point to make once in a while. Once again, we are proven wrong.
  23. The element of chance--that is, of measurement error--causes scores to seem more widely distributed than they really are. Thus, someone who scored a 750 on the math section of the SAT is expected to get a 725 upon retaking that test. 830319[/snapback] my God you are a complete fuggin moron. You still dont even understand what the hell you are blindly copying/pasting.
  24. never fear! HA continues to make an ass out fo himself, so theres no worries of the stats thread going anywhere anytime soon.
×
×
  • Create New...