Jump to content

Ramius

Community Member
  • Posts

    14,579
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Ramius

  1. More like... "we put Craig in there in the 4th quarter after JP was sacked 6 times, and we removed him 2 series later after we were reminded of why he's #3 on the depth chart BEHIND kelly holcomb."
  2. yup. lets follow the morals of such republicans as foley.
  3. This is what happens when you are dealing with someone who is the "0" on the IQ test, but not one of the unlucky ones.
  4. theres a difference between being morally sound and then passing laws requiring others to follow whatever you determine as being morally sound. Christ, what happens when some psycho fundamentalist wants to make pre-marital sex illegal? (a crazy example i know, but it highlites the problem) now i am off to lunch and a seminar, so i'll be back later on.
  5. And once again, you pick some random "threshold" that doesnt portray accurately what is going, it just supports your random bull sh--. Eliminating data and picking random thresholds doesnt make a good scientific study.
  6. I understand that. But as stated above, people are free to live their lives under different morals. I dont agree with some of them, but i dont think there sholud be laws on what morals you have to live by. The best example i can think of is myself. *I* am against abortion. But i am also pro-choice. I dont think the government should be allowed to tell a woman whether or not she can get one. (i am not starting an abortion debate, just making an example)
  7. which makes me happy. but the stem cell bill really pisses me off, because most of it comes from misunderstanding. (mind you it has no effect on the stem cells i work with, because they are adult cells)
  8. And you've just identified 3 of my main reasons for hating bush. i'm no tree-hugging liberal, but i cant stand a candidate who is running the country based on HIS morals.
  9. This will fix his (and your) issues. http://zapatopi.net/afdb/
  10. How about JP NEVER looks at the WR he going to throw to? Not even when hes going to pass. That would really confuse some defenses. He can stare righ the entire time, and then throw left without even looking. Now THAT is a guaranteed score.
  11. funny. i could make the same statement about crazy conservative trailer trash southern hick ass inbred rednecks.
  12. Perhaps because by the time he gets to read #2 he's been or about to be knocked on his ass.
  13. right now, schaub is nothing more than the second coming of RJ. He put up big numbers in 1 game. No way you give up draft picks for him. let some other team overspend on him. I'm not saying he wont be good, but to deem him a HOFer is asinine.
  14. I agreed. i dont wish injury on anyone, but this scumbag POS deserves everything he gets. I definitely dont feel bad at all.
  15. I've been trying to figure this out for 15 pages myself. How in sam hell does someone automatically do worse on the second IQ test, and how does error automatically disappear on the second test. Where does it go? So lets say i take the IQ test the first time and score 190. the second time i am have no chance of scoring higher? I automatically score lower? wtf? So summing this bull sh-- up, HA is trying to state that error causes regression toward the mean, and that this error automatically ceases to exist in the second test? What kind of ass backwards logic is that? what kind fo retard comes up with that?
  16. I hate to limit it to the first round, but if marv goes after DB's early and often in the 2007 draft, and avoids the OL early, then i will have a serious problem. I'm just not lumping him in with TD. He's had 1 year, and he built up the defense. I fully expect him to address the line and other need areas (DE, LB) this offseason. You dont know how much i hope you are wrong on his draft strategy. Because if you are right, the team is in trouble.
  17. 1. what the hell is a slong? is that like a sling? 2. what the hell is recessitation? did his mom take you out for recess some day?
  18. As chris rock rock says... "He lied about a blowjob so his wife wouldnt find out. Whats so wrong with that. Is that against the law? sh--, i bet theres a couple hundred guys in this room that have done that. Just because he's president means he cant get some action on the side?" Chris then goes on to blame hilary, saying if she was doing her job as a wife, Bill wouldnt have had ot go elsewhere for a blowjob. I find that part hilarious. The girlfriend doesnt.
  19. I guess it all depends on who is available at #32
  20. Jason Campbell. They have a first round QB waiting in the wings, and an aging 38 year old washed up QB who cant hack it to well anymore.
  21. would this have been after or before Nall threw for 400 yards in the same game?
  22. but but but but he was a reach! Marv is an idiot for drafting s safety at #8!
  23. Its because there is no controversy. Sure fans can whine and B word, like you, but at OBD, Losman is the clear cut starter. As said above, the only place there is any kind of controversy is in your little head and in your big crusade.
  24. No, it cant. And why in the hell did you eliminate all IQ scores below 115? I am convinced that you think you can just eliminate any data, for whatever reason. And you wonder why your posts have no credibility around here.
  25. 25 - definitely the rest of this year, and if we adress the problems on this team (OL, lack of a #2 WR) he should get a good piece of next year.
×
×
  • Create New...