kitchen sink

Or at least a stiff arm!

I think Michael Hoeht, Joey Bosa and Joshua Palmer might pop more than we think, but for me the optimism is that they did not overreact and blow things up. Instead they addresses the areas of most concern. I also like the way they are stacking the practice squad with player like Poyer and Phillips, who can player-coach younger players and be there for break glass in case of emergency situations for a game of two.

Sometimes when you flip a coin four times it comes up tails every time (especially when the refs are going to give your opponent the calls just like the NBA stars get). The hall mark of the Bills between Marv Levy and McD was instability. I would rather not flip a coin on a new coach with a chance at going back to that. As I wrote in another thread on this topic a while back; None of us is anywhere near qualified to judge McD (or any other head coach for that matter). Have you ever supervised an organization with over 100 people? I have not. Have you ever lead young men making tens of millions of dollars, with huge egos and incredibly diverse backgrounds and perspectives as a cohesive team? I have not. Have you ever lead an organization in arguably the most competitive industry in the world? I have not. I would recommend you have some faith and enjoy the ride.

Availability is you best ability. I think here should be no adjustment when comparing QBs because one was injured more (or was not able to play through the injury). That is a part of what make a great player a great player.

My hope is that the Eagles organization has the same view as this fan site about the Bills (same for all the other teams in the NFL), but I highly doubt it. I note this as the other teams know much better than any fan how good the Bills are. The reason for this is as the original poster alluded the Bills were a play or two (or a call or two) away from the Super Bowl last year (and possibly the last four years). As such, the changes the Bills made this year to address the two main areas of concern, namely the defensive line and some wide receivers that are good at man-to-man separation, could very likely make the Bills the team to beat in the NFL.

I think we all focus a lot on the big name players, but the Bills organization's focus and delivery on depth has been one of if not the best in the league in the last three or four years. In a sport where the injury rate approaches 100%, the value of this is difficult to overstate.

I trust Lance.

I think everything related to the scheduled is overrated as a material factor in a team winning the Super Bowl. Unfortunately, the population is a very small in the data analysis world with a population of only 34 winners spread over 34 years. Remember that the current bye week system only started in 1990. This makes any true analysis of little value. All the discussion does fill a lull period in the NFLs calendar year. 🤑

Yes, Yes he has.

Nice work if you can get it 🤣

The quote I commented on said that; "240 at his size is tiny". It had nothing to do with how he looks.

So Josh Allen is tiny now?

So you selected punter too 🙂?

Hard to lose respect you don't have.

Well I guess we can all hope for this to happen a second time...

Or maybe throwing to some of the 8 WRs, 5 RBs and 3 TEs currently on the roster (not include the TE just drafted)?

I totally agree, but I think that increases the chances of the end of camp trade I noted, as well as the chances of better corner back play than last year. Let the best men win.

Or maybe an end of camp trade for a 2026 5th round pick?

I see the Deone Walker selection as a statement by the Bills that they believe in their coaching and strength/conditioning process. Deone has unteachable size, but needs to trade about 50 lbs. of upper body fat for 30 lbs. of lower body muscle mass and related strength (not that you can really trade one for the other, but you get the point). The 450lb kid from Florida would be about two times that challenge.

Here is the best I could do.

Based on this trend, mine would be any trade up in the first round that costs more than pick 132.

My best mock, which would make me very happy.

Thank you for recognizing that I am not trying to be a jerk. There actually are calculations that can determine with a reasonable level of accuracy how many reps you can bench at one weight compared to another weight based on the number of reps at that first weight. People use them all the time to determine how many reps they should be doing at various percentages of the one rep max. It is one way to test how close to failure you are getting, which is one of the more important factors in muscle and strength growth. The attached image is the results from the calculator you can find at https://strengthlevel.com/one-rep-max-calculator It is based on your 5 reps at 225 lbs and it appears I was being generous at the 20 reps of 175lbs. My thought is that you might also have been able to do more than 5 reps, but did not push all the way to failure, in which case you might have been able to get closer to 35 reps at 175lbs Unfortunately, it appears that you never tried to see how many reps you could have done at that time at your body weight so we can't test this in the best manner.

I don't want to be a jerk, but I think I have more familiarity with this space. If you could do 5 reps of 225, you would not have been able to do 35 reps of 175. You might have been able to get 20. Strength to weight is not a linear relationship. As you get heavier you do not progress in strength at the same rate.

I beg to differ, how many reps of 225 can you do?