Bob Jones

I agree, but honestly, with the weapons they have, he doesn’t have to be. And when he's having an accurate throwing day, they are pretty much unstoppable.

The play called by Dorsey on the 4th down near the goal line, that failed, was abhorrent. 😂 How about a QB sneak, or a fake QB sneak and a bootleg to the outside by JA17? Could have even had JA under center with one RB in the backfield, fake the handoff to said RB, then have JA rollout for an easy walk in TD. You know the Raiders were going to stuff the box there. C'mon man! LOL

Yes, since he’s basically doing what 99% of the posters in here said he should be doing….stop forcing deep balls, and instead, go underneath and take the easy completions.

What? I mean up until that throw, and the ONE dirtball down the left side in the first half, he has been very accurate. C’mon man.

His money is guaranteed, so no need to play too hard! 😉

Yep, agree 100%. What is also pretty amazing is that the two jacka**es calling the game said NOTHING about that blatant, late hit. Josh was way down before that fat Quin piled on, and went for his head too.

It was OPENING NIGHT…first game back after a horrible performance vs the Bengals. Josh himself seemed to make a big deal in the off season on how he was going to concentrate on football, concentrate on winning (ha ha..what a joke). Then he comes out making wrong decisions on where to go with the ball, looking like a sophomore college QB in his first game. Something just ain’t right. At this stage in his career, no way on earth should he be throwing those picks…the fumble, that’s gonna happen sometimes, so that’s OK. His reads were poor, and as pointed out in another thread, he really wasn’t under a lot of pressure, yet he had happy / neurotic feet in the pocket.

The thing that is sort of mind boggling is that he had a bunch of crappy games last year (even though they won most of those), and if he had studied the tape after those crappy performances, he should be much improved (really better now, but should have been better in the last handful of games last year), but it doesn't appear to be that he is/was. So, does he watch tape at all?

When I saw this live, I thought for sure that the Bills were going to pick up 15 yards for a PF by that dirty lineman.

From everything I've read & seen about last year's snow shenanigans, he seems like a cool neighbor. 😉

One thing bothering me is that a lot of people have said "you're never gonna win with 4 turnovers", but at that point, heading in to OT, it was a brand new game, and the Bills got the ball first, so the earlier 4 turnovers meant nothing....they just had to put a drive together and score, but of course it was 3 and out. I'm old enough to remember a couple years ago, where every Bills fan was crying "we lost the OT toss...it's not fair, we never had a chance!" LOL Obviously, the offense lost this game.

Hey, don’t forget about Beane, McClappy, and Dorsey!!!

I assume that you're a lawyer? If yes, aren’t the hearsay rules very different for criminal courts vs civil lawsuits, in that the rules are way less stringent for civil, and heresay can be used in civil cases?

I work in construction. A few seconds can change your life, or even end your life. May he RIP.

So I can put away my pitchfork now? Or should I keep it out for Beane, McClappy, Josh, and Dorsey? 🤔😂

Right, but I'm assuming that was to go after Josh & Dorsey....now you've got another target! Win, win! 😉

Well, if it's in a lawsuit, it must be true.....hold on, Matt Araiza is on line 1. LOL

Who is Jim Trotter?

Re the PF leg whip: The ball would have gone back 15 yards to the 42, so it MIGHT have mattered had the Bills D made a stand, or a fumble, or a sack, or an interception. 😉

Hey Moderators: I'm sort of new here, but I was wondering should I start my own thread with my post game takes like Lost did here, or just post up to one of the many other post game threads already on here? LOL

The PERSONAL FOUL leg whip happened at the 27 yard line, so take it back 15 yards to the 42 yard line. So yeah, Bills D could have made a stand...

Yes, very likely that Jets still would have won on a FG, but..... It IS an issue because it's either gross incompetence by the refs....no way that wasn't seen by 3-4 refs as it was in the open field, right next to the ball carrier....or the "fix" was in. Also, why couldn't the TD have been overturned on replay review, as all TDs are reviewed?

And it wasn’t even close to being a hard hit or viscous tackle. Compare that tackle where AR got hurt to all the times in the game JA17 was twisted, pounded, beat, etc. 27 is way more durable than 39, I guess!

In addition to being disappointed by JA17's demise, I'm really disturbed by the OP's incorrect use of apostrophes in this thread's title line! It should be TDs and INTs....C'mon man!!! 😉

A good...well, perfect...throw in that Vikings game would have yielded a TD, but the throw was BEHIND the WR and a little low. Was it overconfidence or just a bad elbow that prevented it from being a perfect throw? Or both.