Einstein's Dog

To me the explanation behind the Cowboys odds drop does not make sense. Why would being stagnant decrease their odds? They added no one of note and lost T Pollard, Gallup, and an OLman. And Philly signed Barkley. The lack of hype and talk has got to be killing J Jones. Adding Diggs would be huge in terms of talk and increased odds/eyeballs. Also giving Dak the weapons of Cee Dee and Diggs and going with a heavy passing attack could help in determining what they do in the future contract of Dak (which seems in question). Gonzo above (and seconded by Mr WEO) seem to think moving Diggs for a 1st would be something they would like. Then Dallas seems to be in play to me.

Drop rate has a lot of subjectivity to it. The one they were referencing in the podcast had a low rate attributable to K Coleman - I don't know which one they used. If X Legette/K Coleman/T Franklin are all there I think this might be the year to trade back a little.

But according to the hype tape, he wasn't trying to get a lot of separation. They claimed Coleman was purposefully going right to the CB. They called it "stepping on the toes" of the CB, and the tape they showed seemed to back this up. Coleman was running right to where the CB was and then making the CB do something. Coleman didn't get much room but according to the statistics they provided seemed like that was all he needed - an incredibly low drop rate. This was a podcast by homers of the school but it did bring up a good possible point. And they poo-poo'd the LSU guys as being schemed open and anyone could do that.

It could be BS. That was part of my point, the FO has to make that call. And it probably is a big part of the decision. If they did the interview and came away with positives we might see the Bills do a small move up for Mitchell. The Bills/Beane do get nervous if their man is coming close - and I think they feel pretty justified in it from last year with the look of the Dallas war room after Kincaid was sniped from them. And they do have the Bills behind us and once again Dallas ahead of us - both dangers.

There was talk of A Mitchell taking plays off. An implication that Mitchell was a bit of a prima donna. Questions as to why someone with his height/weight/speed combo didn't do more. If A Mitchell were drafted there is the impression he would contact Josh pretty quickly and ask about the next charity golf event and if Hailee has any girl friends, whereas the first questions out of K Coleman are when can they get together and have the first 1,000 passes thrown his way.

I thought it was a little weird coming from you because the top reason for the stack scenario is brought about by anti-Diggs sentiment, moving on quickly -even this year from him. The second most popular stack reason is non-belief in Shakir. You've never expressed either of those opinions. As to the rankings of the WRs I can only think in tiers because we don't get the interviews. Knowing the mindset, attitude would make a huge difference. For instance if the rumors of A Mitchell took place in talks with the Bills FO, I would think he would be out. On the other hand, the X Legette and K Coleman seem like excellent fits.

Yes, move back and get one of X Legette/K Coleman/T Franklin. I was with you until the end, the Warriorspike like overreach of a good thing. I am against the spending the extra pick on another WR. There are a lot of areas that would benefit from a rising young player - DL, S, and even OL. Drafting two WRs high in the draft would a sure way to thwart one of those two WRs or Shakir out of PT and development.

The problem w drafting center at 28 is the odds of the Bills getting one of the top 8 or so WRs drops dramatically. Waiting until #60 for a WR is way too risky for my blood. I'm not against trading down and then if available getting a top C and one of the top 8 WRs, but I don't think that would be a FO thought. i don't think they'll go with offense the first two picks again.

It would make sense to me in a scenario where X Legette/K Coleman/T Franklin and McConkey are all there, that the Bills move back. They could then draft one of them a little later and have better draft spots for DL + S (or BPA) later on.

I am holding out hope for Zeke. I want him picked late and at a good value. A veteran who can get the tough short yards and knows how to pass block would be a great fit here. Contrary to the stats provided above, when I saw him in action last year I saw a good RB. Also, Zeke has been kind of humbled and with that can be a chip on his shoulders. I would find it easy to root for him now (I didn't before).

We want more than just a WR out of this draft though. WR, DL, and S. Players who are part of the future in short time. I think Beane will have to think long and hard about moving back a little if his preferred non-prima donna WRs are all still there at 28 - Legette/K Coleman and maybe T Franklin.

That helped increase my excitement about Coleman! The comments about stepping on the toes was interesting, so many people were talking about Coleman's lack of separation and this analysis was stating it was by design. And with the low drop rate seemed like it worked well. If Coleman and Legette are both there, I can see Beane dropping back because either of them seem like great fits.

I'm hoping Bills at Miami. I'd go. And the weather should be great.

I think the Josh evolving part is on the mental aspects, in terms of game management. For instance the KC game. Josh went for the TD on second down, wrong move. A T Brady or A Rodgers would have just been doing everything to get another first down and drain the clock. The objective there should not have been to score the TD but to burn clock and get a first down. McD and the Bills are on a nice run, just need to break through to the next step. Consistently fielding a very good team is a great way to potentially win the Superbowl.

You might want to listen to Beane's clip yourself then. A lot of people are interpreting it the way Sal is, but not me. They asked Beane what he was looking for in a WR just a few minutes after asking about C Samuels. He had just talked about Samuel's being in the RB room and the WR room, how he was smart and versatile. So to me it seemed like the first few qualities that came to Beane's mind were the ones he had just attributed to Samuel. From there Beane continued on to other traits, and in his GM speak, pretty much covered every WR on the planet including how you may need to offset the roster, get something you don't currently have. IMO, not something you need to pull your hair out over, just something the talking heads are cherry picking out for conversation purposes.

I agree. And I don't think Beane even answered the question of whether or not they offered a pay cut, seems like they didn't. With so many draft picks it seems like a later round CB who might develop behind Douglas would make more sense than bringing back Tre. Hyde makes more sense to me at a cheap price. While the Bills should try and get a younger developing player it seems like they could still use another veteran presence.

I don't think Tre comes back. IMO the blurb from Beane about Tre was because he was put in a tough interview spot when right after his praise of Von for taking a pay cut they asked him if the pay cut had been an option discussed with Tre. There was a telling, panicked, half second before Beane got into his preprogrammed GM speak. We'll have to see what happens with the draft but right now I give much better odds for Hyde to come back than Tre.

Groot is staying, long term. I thought Beane's response put it as a long shot for Tre and Micah.. Money issues, they would need to come back quite cheaply but both are certainly welcome. A vet RB is the odds on favorite of what will happen, the FO is waiting for one to get kind of desperate, take a discounted rate, and great value for us.

I like that the team seems to be reconstructing the way I had hoped. The FO is going with a slight retool but being a contender. It would be a retool and not a rebuild as long as they keep Diggs. The FO has kept the strategy of going low cost for RBs and is now adding low cost Safety's. I like the WR Samuel pick up. But my liking the strategy is contingent upon the FO getting a WR in the first two rounds, otherwise I'll have to reassess.

The 2024 TE room is the anticipated best the Bills have ever had! Kincaid is coming off a sensational rookie year. He is incredibly fluid and has great hands. I think he'll be the best TE the Bills have ever had and that starts in 2024. Nitpicking about his drops is ridiculous, I watched every game, his hands are among the elite to ever play the game. Of course there are things he can improve on, and it's not unreasonable to anticipate that he will. Knox adds an excellent veteran presence with a more rounded TE skill set that includes blocking. Knox was making a case of the best TE the Bills had ever had until Kincaid came along. Knox also brings a great team attitude, from bonding with Josh to concentrating on improving, to pay cuts and restructures, Knox just presents himself as a glue player that I'm glad is on the Bills. Even Morris showed positive signs in his limited action. I don't know if I ever knew who the third TE on the Bills was in prior years.

You have to figure Blackmon wanted a bigger contract. If that was the problem, I'm on board for going cheaper. But if the FO doesn't do any other S moves I think the likelihood that they draft a S in the first 3 rounds increases. I'm hoping they do another safety move, I liked the wild card Hyde call above. That would move safety down the draft list and we would look solid IMO.

But there was drama being told to us by Diggs. 1. "Ready for watever" indicates from Diggs that movement is possible. I thought it could have been provoked because Diggs turned down a request by Beane to take a pay cut. Don't you think that happened? After declining the pay cut Diggs could have been anxious that Beane didn't want to pay him. 2. "Well..." hours before the guarantee kicked in supports the above. Could be considered poking Beane a little, like what are you going to do about it. Seems like kind of a toothless threat out of Beane. 3. Diggs listing his stats for the past four years could be seen as trying to justify his salary to the fans. And to be honest, Diggs has a point, look at what Ridley got. So IMO, there was some drama. Still is, a little, we haven't seen how Beane reacts when a player gets the better of him. These guys have egos. It doesn't mean Diggs wants to leave Buffalo

Well....

Ready for watever.

The quote "Ready for watever" isn't shade or snark though. Seems like it was being anxious to what Beane had up his sleeve since Diggs refused to take a pay cut. I would be anxious if my employer asked me to take a pay cut and I said "No". Especially with an $18.5M guarantee approaching. Diggs shouldn't go anywhere, the Bills will be a better team with him on it. But you have to think Beane doesn't like getting made the fool. Diggs called his bluff and it looks like a toothless gesture out of Beane.