Jump to content

FireChans

Community Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    12,900

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by FireChans

  1. FireChans
    One correction. Sherfield was the 4 in Miami. Cedrick Wilson was paid a lot of money to be 3
  2. FireChans
    My thoughts exactly. Just don’t tell @transplantbillsfan
  3. FireChans
    It’s actually net points in tiebreakers, and turnovers can lead to opponents scoring, so you’re wrong again unfortunately. Try again lol
  4. FireChans
    I have a confession. I placed a wager on Josh Allen winning MVP before the KC game.
  5. FireChans
    If TO’s don’t matter in wins, then TD’s don’t matter in losses. You really painted yourself in a corner there lol
  6. FireChans
    This is hilarious circular logic.
  7. FireChans
    Those turnovers DID matter lol.
  8. FireChans
    You’re just wrong. there’s no other way to describe it. There’s no statistical analysis that supports your position that turnovers EVER don’t matter. Nothing.
  9. FireChans
    IN EVERY CASE ITS NOT.
  10. FireChans
    I think that the QB throwing 4 picks is a huge reason they are about to get blown out. crazy concept.
  11. FireChans
    Probably, yeah.
  12. FireChans
    No, what I’m saying is, by definition, those TO’s have ALREADY affected the outcome.
  13. FireChans
    Turnovers still matter. Some of them are luck for sure. Being lucky or being unlucky also matters lol.
  14. FireChans
    Okay. You know, I happen to think lots of things that happen in games affect the outcome. If the Niners lose, Purdy’s 3 INT’s will be a big reason why. No matter what else happens. I disagree. Josh’s passing TD numbers are not huge statistical aberrations. His rushing TD’s are, and he ain’t throwing picks when he runs.
  15. FireChans
    Dak took down his INT’s by a huge margin this season. Is he a worse QB than last year? By every measure, no.
  16. FireChans
    Show me any data that sacks, penalties etc are as correlated to wins/losses as TO’s.
  17. FireChans
    See, I don’t care if folks say, “hey Josh is gonna turn it over, it sucks but it is what it is.” But folks say silly things like “turnovers don’t matter” or “turnovers don’t correlate with losses.” Its comical. There was once a contingent of posters who debated that you didn’t need a franchise QB to win football games. They are gone now.
  18. FireChans
    Josh didn’t score more points than his opponent in our losses.
  19. FireChans
    This is just wrong. Turnovers differential is super correlated to wins and losses. This would be like saying “the Steelers defense forcing a bunch of turnovers isn’t the reason they win games.”
  20. FireChans
    Turnovers are bad!
  21. FireChans
    Josh overcoming Josh’s mistakes isn’t as good as Josh making less mistakes.
  22. FireChans
    Josh threw a pick at the end of half that gave the Broncos 3. They won by two. Josh threw a pick first play from scrimmage that gave the Pats 7. They won by 4. Sucks.
  23. FireChans
    This is completely incorrect.
  24. FireChans
    Josh gave both those teams points enough to win lol.
  25. FireChans
    Mahomes has been sneaky kinda bad this year tbh.
×
×
  • Create New...