Bruffalo

I did miss that, thanks for the quote.

How mad do you think my in-laws would be if I take up valuable kitchen space to fry wings for the game?

The NFC has maybe 3 good teams, and the Vikings are likely one of them. They'll be fine.

It feels pretty unlikely that it's White keeping himself off the field. My guess is that the coaching staff aren't prepared to risk him with the level of play he's showing in practice, maybe he's not playing markedly better than Jackson/Benford/Elam yet.

I don't trust the team,the coaching staff, and maybe the QB to show up in the big moments anymore. I hate that watching football as a Bills fan is existential dread at what bonehead "shoot yourself in the foot" move they can do next. Allen was "king of the 4th", I want that guy back. I hope they respond well and act like the team we all thought they were, but I certainly don't expect it anymore.

I don't feel like that it's an excuse, frankly. Lots of other traded players from the deadline have made major contributions to their teams. This is a failure of the coaching staff.

I certainly hope he's not on the PS. I'll take rookie athletic upside at this point over Cam "I'm gonna make an INT 1 on 1 against the best WR in the league" Lewis. He looked terrible at safety. We traded for Dean Marlowe for him to ride the bench, apparently. If he's not better than a PS player who has never had an NFL game playing at that position then he shouldn't be on the roster.

Life is pain. Buffalo isn't allowed to have nice things, just shut up and eat your wings. The only happiness you're allowed is the rush that comes from jumping through a folding table 6 beers deep when it's -8 with the wind chill.

I don't understand this take at all. Duke looked like he was running in slow motion out there. When you're fielding the kick at your own 5-8 yard line, you should be consistently getting decent to great field position out of it.

It's how I feel about having Cam Lewis out there even though you just traded for Dean Marlowe. What's the point? I've lost a lot of faith in Dorsey and McDermott on gameday. Players have to execute, but damn it coaches can put them in better positions. We were marching down the field in OT, Allen has a big run, call the TO. Have him calm down and breathe. It seems straightforward to me. Ugh.

I'm not going to rewatch because my emotional sanity is fragile enough as it is but I thought that was Singletary who leaked out into the flat. He was wide open though, no doubt about that. Ugh. Just typing it out makes me feel sick.

Depends how many times Dorsey decides to send all the WRs to the end zone form the 20+ yard line.

I hate this excuse. The Vikings traded for Hockensen and he's immediately put to use, CMC is traded for and instantly slots into the 49ers hyper complicated run game. Such a joke to pretend that Hines couldn't know the playbook by now. The coaching staff are floundering.

None of those players are officially rule out for Sunday, and most of them were day to day last week, so that kind of dulls the edge you're spitting out there frankly. To address your first question: Yes. I think they stand a chance because the Bills are a well coached team with a scheme that is exceptionally friendly to DBs. We also have one of the top edge rushers in the game in Von Miller and a solid interior line. We'll be going against one of the least mobile QBs in football, so pressure will be important, but to say the Bills are the worst defense in the league because they're missing pieces is laughable.

You must not be watching a lot of other games then. It's also very possible we have Poyer, Milano, and White in the starting line up. I'm not sure I'm liking your "smart money".

Did someone scam you into investing in cheeseheadtv.com/blog or something? It's weird that you're pushing a single opinion piece like it was written by god.

Juquan Johnson wasn't exactly inspiring on Sunday either. I'd probably take the athletic first round upside over him anyday, because he did not look like belonged on an NFL field at all.

Okay, so your position is this: Everyone who says something positive about him is lying for unknown reasons, but anything negative is a fact and true? Even when it's not even first or second hand information like a random cheesehead blog? And I'm just going to go with that dating OBJ thing now, and hopefully it makes you more uncomfortable because clearly the idea of men dating men is insulting to you. I totally want to date him. He's a strong beautiful man who just makes me weak at the knees!

Why wouldn't they just not comment on it? Why would they lie?

I wouldn't expect him to want to date me. This is a bizarre point you keep bringing up that seems to stem out of homophobia, I really think you should take some time to be introspective and realize that being gay isn't an insult, and it shouldn't be thrown around in an argument as some sort of "gotcha" line. Give me some first hand quotes from players saying "he was a bad teammate and a locker room problem". You keep saying I'm ignorant but people are giving you first hand accounts saying "we liked him as a teammate" and you're willfully ignoring that, and propping up baseless speculation from a completely random blog as evidence. These are not the signs of a sound thought process.

If you're going to ignore testimony from people who actually were in a locker room with him and take a random blog as gospel, it's going to appear that you're being willfully ignorant.

Are we really going to call a random GB fan blog on par with a Bleacher Report interview with a former teammate? Is this a logical fallacy speedrun?

Now that's the pot calling the kettle black.

Geeze, homophobia in 2022 is a bad look my dude. "many people agree he is not worth the headache" - Does not make it an objective fact. You keep using the word incorrectly. It's an opinion, which is by definition subjective.

I'm not mad at all, but I do think you need a lesson in what is subjective and what's objective.