Simon

Only on your coast.

The kid has 3 NFL starts and is playing in his first primetime game. The chances of him looking good out of the gate tonight fell somewhere between slim and none.

Yeah, they definitely have some potential for quality entertainment

Limeaid has informed me he wants a shot at the title.

Errrrr, nevermind.

Probably. But this early it's still a genuinely meaningful game to both teams and fanbases.

Probably both. Give it some time though; these two are likely playing for a division title so things might heat up.

lol..... I sent the following to the GM of Erie's CBS affiliate earlier today: Looking at your programming schedule, I was very relieved to see the following as it is inarguably the best NFL game on this weekend's schedule with significant local interest. 2023-2024 NFL Football on WSEE/CBS and WICU/NBC Week 4 - Sunday, Oct. 1 at 1 p.m. - Miami at Buffalo - WSEE/CBS But then when I look at your programming schedule I see that you have opted to switch to an absolutely gawdawful game involving Pittsburgh and the painfully unwatchable Houston Texans, neither of which are even in your broadcast area and which clearly goes directly against your stated policy: The local station has little say in what is aired nationally with some rare exceptions. Erie is in the Buffalo market and those games will come first here regardless of team record or state location when circumstance dictates. How you folks can choose to broadcast an awful out of market game instead of the best game of the week which involves the team that is actually in your market is totally baffling. I understand the difficulties your network(s) must face competing with the variety of current technology, but doing this sort of a disservice to your viewers cannot possibly help your position in any way, not to mention it almost certainly will bring a smaller share of viewers to your advertisers. I sincerely hope that before Sunday comes around you opt to go back to your original programming decision and provide your viewers with the best product available that the greatest number of people are likely to want to watch. If you choose not to do that, could you please take a brief moment to respond to this request with the suggestion of who I might contact that has the influence to alter this decision, whether that be someone in advertising, programming, etc? Thank you for your consideration, ******** *******

Not necessarily. The trips leaves Diggs with only one guy to beat. I'll take those odds on most snaps.

His cutting him some slack has ZERO to do with his opinion; it was entirely about the clear, documented history of both players. Which he told you. And you proceeded to ignore so you could rag on him with your own spin. The last word is yours; I'm done clogging up a great thread with your self-aggrandizing bull####.

Give it a minute..... I guess I'm sort of going on priorities, i.e. if you can't protect your QB, it doesn't make a whole lot of difference who he's throwing to.

What a load of bunk. This guy does everybody in this community an awesome favor by taking the time to do this and all you can do is rag on him because his detailed study doesn't match up with your own biases. Maybe either take the time to do your own study or keep your fact-free carping to yourself. Thank you Bocephuz; 99% of us appreciate what you're doing here.

Not disbelieving you but I'm having a hard time buying that because it was probably at least twice that number last week, and I specifically saw multiple instances of LMurray on the LOS engaging the Washington DE while Spencer was setting up in pass pro. Although I do admit to being preoccupied Sunday and being tuned out of the game during long stretches so you could be correct.

Wait, there are good days lifting? Hope is alive!

And it's the only city close enough that I can snag networks via a long distance antenna. Real lifters can type with their noses.

Probably some places you could get away with it but at this level I think these co-ordinators would munch your lunch real quick.

I wasn't being clear I guess. I was also saying (or trying to) that pulling a defender from somewhere to run a box and 1 (a tent and 1?) is probably going to compromise your defense.

Pick one

Opinion? Hope? Groupthink?

Can you tell me who I've picked out as a punching bag every other year? No? Then maybe you should stop making up stuff about me and stick to the subject of the thread instead of dragging my discussion off topic.

You can have mixed coverages, which typically might be man coverage underneath and zones over the top. Or you can flip your corners to make sure the CB you want is on the WR you want him covering (i.e. Tre White chasing Davante Adams to the other side of the field at times). But trying to run an effective zone while pulling one of your guys to man somebody up is probably going to compromise your defense in a way that makes it not worth it. Just too many people to cover on too many parts of the field to do it efficiently, imo.

I just watched the Bills 3 RBs and 2 TEs combine for a grand total of about 30yrds receiving (or about 6 yrds per player) because they're busy spending half the game playing RT. It's a problem just about every week, regardless of whether they win.

I'm not talking about the offensive line. I'm talking about Spencer Brown.

The suggestion that he's shown improvement is not in any way a "fact".