Mikie2times

Brady has no athleticism that is transferable to football. He had one of the worst physical combines in his class. So maybe you can forgive me, but this is a football Message board no? And as I asked, and you clearly showed, none of that Bartolo Colon raw athlete transferred to the gridiron. At lease a sumo wrestler has short term quickness and strength.

I just want him to reflect and understand that his best quality is probably the management of the entire thing and not forcing a system or methodology onto it. Draft the best players. They don’t have to be fast, smaller, high character. Hand the keys to a new coordinator. It doesn’t need to be the system he ran in Philadelphia or Carolina. Seek some outside ideas. You won’t grow unless you look at what other people are doing and we only promote from within. We will see, I’m asking an awful lot with what I’m saying. I don’t expect it to be honest but I do think he’s embracing more man coverage and showed more signs of being multiple on defense this year which I will take.

Siriani gave two high performing coordinators the keys. He focused on managing the team. What does his situation have in common with ours?

By all means, let me know how is baseball athleticism transferred to the NFL where things like running and jumping (how most athletes are measured) actually matter.

I think it’s also more difficult for a guy as athletic as Josh to be at that level pre snap. Brady didn’t have an ounce of athleticism. Burrow isn’t winning with it. If your limitations force that development it becomes more likely l to grow in that area. We could see Josh grow a lot more here as his physical skills decline. He’s already grown a lot with it comparable to his earlier years. But I think the real growth will come when he just can’t depend on Superman showing up. He’s got the smarts.

Like I said in another thread. It’s weird to condemn both McD and the roster at the same time as a team as close as we were. Logically, both can’t suck. I used to focus more on McD’s shortcoming, but this defense is just lacking difference makers. Then we just keep running it back with the B squad extensions. Locking out the potential for actual difference makers. Yes, it’s a problem. It’s not a problem if we want to be a good team. It’s a problem if we want to be a great team.

I promise, a 6”4 235 WR who runs a 4.6 will be available and Beane will make you forgot about all this

in

I think the two best teams were Baltimore and Philly. We beat Baltimore and probably shouldn’t. KC beat us and probably shouldn’t. In the end Philly was the best, so justice I suppose.

1000% and what is great culture worth if it doesn’t afford you that ability?

Sure, but TBH I think those assets need to go proven commodity. I just don’t think we can depend on the 30 something player in the draft making the type of impact we need him to have. Can it happen? Sure. But with where we are, you mortgage 1st round picks that are always late for us anyway. Beane has done fine in the later rounds. We need to target difference makers.

We really suffer from the curse of being just good enough in so many areas. The Eagles imploded last year. It forced the change that resulted in what you see today. I just don’t think this team will have large scale changes. As much as I want to see it something like that. Curse of being just good enough.

I mean, KC limped thru the regular season the beat a crap Houston team and probably should have lost to us for the second time. They have very few quality wins. The Eagles have been beating up good opponents all year and have “A” talent on both sides. They seemed to be better and no question that is the case. It doesn’t appear like the Super Bowl will change what you would think the outcome would be. I don’t know why it was so hard to see what I just said prior but it was there if you looked for it and didn’t expect the Chiefs to just win because they usually do.

I thought the Chiefs score on everybody. That’s what I’ve been told.

They don’t, Ravens or Bills were better.

Looking like the Bucs Super Bowl

Wild that these fringe calls are still going to KC with so much awareness over it

So Palestinian's and Jews have been fighting for this land for almost 80 years. It’s the most dangerous stretch of land in the world with religious differences and land ownership at the heart of the conflict. This is the Middle East, a place we were desperate to leave for so long. He is dumb enough and arrogant enough to think somehow he can navigate this. I hope this situation isn’t what is required to prove it to some.

This is largely where I'm at, but I will say, the idea of getting an ACTUAL game wrecker at DL is more appealing based on this. Which I believe you oppose. But I feel like it's more based on hitting on who that difference maker is vs the side of the ball they play. I'm squeamish we would be getting the max benefit of a WR1 which make me lean DL. But more than anything we just need a clear hit.

It's funny how sensitive people can be to just a basic question in how we view things. So you have some perspective..... Diggs had Brady as his OC for 7 regular season games he was active in. If you only look at games Diggs was active, he had 137 games in which a previous 7 game sample existed. This crosses seasons. It obviously wouldn't start until he has played in 7 games in his career. Out of those 137 instances, he had 1 where he averaged less yards than the 7 game sample with Brady. It happened the previous 7 games week 1 of 2016 (so the end of his rookie year). Cooper had Brady for 8 regular season games he was active for. If you look at games in which Cooper was active, he had 154 games in which a previous 8 game sample existed. Out of those 154 instances, he had 3 where he averaged less yards than the 8 game sample with Brady. All 3 happened concurrently his 3rd year with the Raiders. So when we say these questions aren't meaningful, I really don't understand how people can arrive at that. These are the options that explain the above: Both were so forgone/injured _____ that they just both happened to have near career low output in B2B years with us (in a very good offense which makes it even more weird). Brady can effectively scheme a #1 but it should or shouldn't matter to us because our offense is very successful Brady can't effectively scheme a #1 but it should or shouldn't matter to us because our offense is very successful In those three options, sure, it can be a blend. But only 1 option suggests spending on a #1 would amount to anything more than a decoy. Which might in fact be a very valuable thing to us but I don't imagine it would be enticing to a FA. Nor would it be an advantage that isn't eventually taken away if you don't in fact eventually use that weapon. It can only be a decoy for so long. As we ask ourselves what priority we place on FA's and the draft I think this question is probably among the most important to the offseason.

Trump will stabilize the Middle East with American occupancy

Diggs for his sample under Brady was his worst since joining Buffalo. Cooper just had one of his worst seasons as a pro. I think most people see these outcomes as two separate things and that very well could be the case. Diggs was a little banged up + drama and Cooper was also banged up. But I’m also not ignoring the common denominator of the two being Brady especially when I see people advocating for that #1 WR. Do you think these two WR’s suffered decreases independent of Brady or do think his scheme limited them? If the scheme limits #1’s do you still value a true #1 the same as you would in another scheme?

I’m more worried if the hit bothered him

Samuels, Shakir are. Kinkaid often plays out of it. Coleman was better at big slot at FSU. I would much rather be adding boundary weapons. We have a lot of mix and match options from the slot.

He's the type of guy you can get for a 5th. But yet another slot guy.