ngbills

Not Allen’s best today. Got the victory with good play late but was not at his best.

It was as bad as looked. The players even said so. It’s ok, that happens. But I do think there are some troubles with OL that need to be fixed or we could struggle come playoffs time. Norwell would be such a nice boost.

A little. But imo the whole plan sucked.

Maybe your on to something. Let’s come up with a crap game plan and see if we can still when. Check. Next week we let the offense play but the d has run prevent all game and still hold them to field goals only. I am not sure what Daboll saw that made him think we need to throw the majority of passes behind it at the line of scrimmage. It was until we started going downfield that the o did anything. Felt like we had to protect a qb that can’t throw vs the worlds best secondary.

No one offense should get jack. Allen included. That was not his best showing. Made some plays at the end but that was hard to watch.

Defense played solid enough. Offense, offensive. Game plan was atrocious. Execution was poor. Decisions were bad. Clock management sucked and luckily didn’t need any time outs. Allen seems lost like early in his career. Even threw a bunch of dumb balls and lots of wobblers off bad feet. if we need to fix OL then do it ASAP. Hopefully that helps Allen.

We look like the last year bills d

Don’t need an upgrade for Wallace? Gave up the reception, missed an int

Let's just grab Engram or Hurst before GB does. If we can also get Norwell or Fuller then I consider either. No need to give up more than late round picks or guys like Addison, Butler, etc.

https://www.airbnb.com/rooms/24122608?adults=6&location=Buffalo%2C NY&previous_page_section_name=1001&translate_ugc=false&federated_search_id=5e07fb05-cb33-4fe0-8023-5f25d99a9cda&guests=1

Big Ditch and Pressure Drop for beer. Resurgance is decent as well.

137-3

No brainer trades if available on the cheap - Fuller, Cooks, Norwell, Engram, Sanders

If we traded Addison we still not dress AJE or Basham. I really dont see a huge drop from Addison to either of those guys.

Addison for Engram/Hurst or Norwell/Hernandez or Sanders.

utilize the edges, play action roll out, crossing routes, spread the field, make the d account for allen;s legs

I would say yes and no. At every level this changes and there are always those that adjust faster than others. What also happens is some dont get the same opportunities. That is why you will see guys blossom a few years into careers or even older guys that seemingly are way better. But the "it" factor concept? Not sure how real it is at the pro level. Most of the guys that get this far have or had the it factor. I think it becomes being in the right situation more often than not. And I will end with - have you ever heard from players or coaches that player xyz sucks, doesn't have it, etc. No. Its always glowing reviews. We heard it from EJ Manuel to Nate Peterman and basically everyone else.

Sanders - 4.49 vs DS 4.66 and Moss 4.7. That is a big difference. And Sanders is listed at 211 which is heavier than both of them.

Henry long TD call still pisses me off. Multiple holds and a block in the back. Especially since they call back the two Bills TD's on similar holds that they let slide on Henry's run.

Any offense issues would not be due to Sanders.

No problem giving away 5-7 rounders for a rental player. Heck even 2-4 round picks would be considered. With our roster we have 2nd rounders not even active on game days.

is this even a question? Obviously you dont have to be a one seed, but if you have the chance it is a huge advantage. Just because there non 1 seeds that have made it means nothing.

I have no problem trading 5-7 round picks for someone that would help now. Losing those types of picks for a help us now guy is a no brainer. If Breida = Sanders then our coaching staff has a lot of explaining to do why he is not even active for games.

Already thinking playoffs...