Motorin'

So Trotter is lying in so far as the law suit is the only place where he's made the allegation and he never actually insisted to the league that Terry in fact made those comments. Got it.

Yet twice as many instances of, I heard it from a guy who heard it form a guy... so it must be true. Of course someone can harbor some racist thoughts, no matter who they marry. But the truth is nobody in this thread knows what he did or didn't say, and the person making the allegations admits he wasn't even there when they were supposedly uttered. I'll tell you what I find improbable, that a guy who owns a team of majority black players in a majority black league and has helped create generational wealth for dozens of black men thinks that black people should go back to Africa. That's standard white supremacist, "black people don't belong" in American language. If Terry Pegula thinks black people should go back to Africa he sure has a funny way of showing it.

The lawsuit asserts it as a fact that Pegula said those things, and then only in the foot notes do you learn that Trotter never heard Pegula say them.

No! That is not what the law suit says. The lawsuit says that on a Zoom call Trotter heard a reporter say that Pegula had said those things. Trotter never heard Terry say anything to that effect. He is insisting it is a fact that Terry said those things because someone else told him so. And the lawsuit goes on to claim it was swept under the rug because the NFL never interviewed Trotter in the investigation... Why would anything Trotter has to say have any bearing on the truth of what Terry did or didn't say? He wasn't there to hear anything. It goes back to the idea of, well I believe it's something someone like him would say. So there's no harm in me spreading a lie because everyone will believe it and no one will be able to prove I lied.

Here's the problem for Trotter. His law suit doesn't allege Terry made the statement. It asserts it as fact. And then it turns out he wasn't in the room to have direct knowledge. So he is basing his statement of fact on somebody else's word. So no, he doesn't have to prove anything about Terry for his overall law suit against the NFL. However, he made a statement of fact that he has no direct evidence to know for certain if it is true or false. That's a very dangerous position to be in when the potential damage to Pegula is massive. He either must really trust his source to be 100% spot on, or not think there's any repercussions for being wrong.

I believe Trotter is saying another reporter on a Zoom meeting relayed the allegation to 40 co-workers on the call.

40 corroborating witnesses to say they heard some reporter say they heard Terry say something three years ago at dinner that the 40 other reporters weren't at?

Sauce was breaking on Kincaid, he didn't have Davis covered. Davis telegraphed his route the whole way and rounded his cut, which gave the S the time he needed to break underneath. Had Davis froze him for one step and made a sharp cut it was an easy completion.

This was the one INT that wasn't on Allen. Davis ran a lazy route and didn't give the Safety the slightest indication that he might break inside. Not only did he not fake fake inside, then he rounds his out cut, both combined were the only reason the S had the time to undercut and make the pick.

And I didn't misrepresent your sentiments in the previous post.

I heard from another poster that you said all white billionaires should go back to Transylvania where they came from.

What's the over / under on the reporter Trotter is quoting actually being present at the dinner vs. having heard from someone else? It's not like the press on either side of this country's political divide has anything remotely like an unblemished track record for just reporting the facts. Enough people have popped up in this thread saying they don't care if Terry actually said those exact things, he's guilty of being a white billion which makes him racist by default. And if you're of that mind set, it sure sounds like what a white racist billion would say. So there's no harm in attributing it to him.

Wonder if the unidentified reporter heard it from another unidentified reporter?

In what world does someone get to put "I heard from someone else" that so and so said such and such and have it be anything but hearsay?

When has a reporter ever lied, or gotten the facts wrong when relaying a second hand account? Let's go to the phones, we have Jussie S. calling in from Chicago.

And a solid RT. No coincidence his best year was the season that D Williams played his best football at RT. But yeah, Josh done lost his mind last night.

Not just any run, but a run right at Q. And they kept running right at him. With no success. The few times that they ran a stretch it worked really well, except the play that they didn't block Q.

There was one I formation stretch to the outside with Gilliam lead blocking that went for 10 yards. And they never went back to it, yet insisted on running right at Q all night long for -1 to 2 yards.

according the last 300 posters, the Bills not only already lost the game, but the whole season.

Maybe he's a new, newcam?

I called it small nickel cause Bernard is freaking small for a LB.

Good drive. They can't cover Kincaid with a LB. Need to throw to him more.

But playing a small nickel against basically a goal line offense is so dumb.

It's a long season.

Really liked being able to pick numerous combos of games to have on screen. Usually went with 4 at a time and just toggled between the sound. Did not like how long it took to go full screen on one game, and then back to multiview.