Kelly the Dog

They sure don't wrap up well at all. Today they were excellent. No Fin had a hole they missed or anything. They were swarmed immediately the whole day.

He's actually a decent player. I have seen him a lot. The Dolphins stink more than him.

I said that a couple times during the game. If the ST are not going to be good anyway, why have a Senorise Perry instead of a guy who can give you an advantage even if it is less than ten snaps.

Kalen Ballage came into the game averaging 2.1 yards per carry. The Bills held him to less than half that. 9 carries. 9 yards.

I want them to be more fearlesser and fearlesser. I didn’t think they played fearless on offense at all. On defense they blitzed a lot more than usual.

The whole game except that one series.

That was completely unexpected and unusual though. They were predictable, boring, and not being aggressive most all of the game. They ran on first down almost every series. They didn't look downfield.

The last line I agree with completely, but that is not Josh's fault. I also do not at all think he had five straight poor or subpar games.

Read the post directly above yours.

A. 37 points. No sacks. No fumbles. No interecptions. 3 TDs. 1 rush TD (not even a sneak or short one). Excellent scrambling and 50+ yards rushing. How is that possibly not an A?

How many screens, swing passes, dump offs, jet sweep passes, or WR screens did he throw today? One? two? Those are the plays that QBs complete that get their perecentages way up.

In my definition there is no difference. I think there are maybe 10 elite WR in the league and they are what I would consider to be #1 WR. But other fans think there are #1 WR who are not the elite, and other fans that think the top WR on your team is a #1. There were people here claiming that Zay Jones was a #1 WR because he got the most targets and most catches. That, to me, is insane. He is not even a #3. To me. That's what I meant by it all depends on your personal definition of #1.

The difference is, the fans that believe there are #1 WR in the league that are not elite WR, like, say, John Brown. Again, it's like the term "Franchise QB". There are some fans who, before this season, would have said Marcus Mariotta and Jamies Winston, for example, were "Franchise QBs." And another huge portion of fans that would have said no way are those two franchise QBs.

I don't think that's true. There is a specific football term of "#1 WR" that does not mean just your team's top WR. A lot of teams have no #1 WR.

The sack anyone could have got. The tackle from behind was really impressive because he rushed on the play I think. Hughes is the only lineman that does that. Really good sign. He had a solid game overall.

Yeah. On the bench.

He's good. He's very good. I was high on him before they got him and thrilled when they did. But it's dependent on what your definition is of a #1. It's like "Franchise quarterback." Some fans think there is ten of them. Some fans think there is twenty of them.

People have different definitions of what is a #1 WR. He's putting up numbers you would want a #1 guy to have. But he's also getting all of the throws you would expect a #1 guy to have without the defense really tailoring their D to stop him because he is not one. To me, and my definition of a #1 WR, to which there are maybe a dozen at most in the league, he is not a #1. He would be an awesome #2 and Beasley would make an excellent #3.

The Dolphins are a bad defense. That is a factor. Its also a factor that this is the first game the OL gave him consistent blocking and time. He had no sacks or fumbles or interceptions. And scrambled well. That is also a factor. This game also showed that he has one WR and one only, although Beasley is a decent complementary slot guy. And maybe arguably a decent TE. I thought Daboll was awful and entirely predictable and they did well despite him not because of him. This is is a very good game considering all those factors.

Actually, no. The play was LONG over before Garrett threw Rudolph to the ground. Like a couple seconds. That was the first act of aggression.

On a side note, there is probably no talking to Mason Rudolph. That dude has a hard head.

The NFL is so bizarre and unpredictable with stuff like this. I am going to say four games. It should be the rest of the season. They will screw it up some way. There is zero excuse for it, and it really could have injured Rudolph badly. What say you?

Agree. That was my purpose for the article. I was kind of making fun of the blame game.

So you’d take him as a backup?

Yep. All the smart, informed, non-cheap people.