MJS

I guess it does matter since the Bills are 7-3. They are winning way more than they are losing.

Why?

I get that. I just don't see a logical reason to get rid of it, personally.

I agree. I see no reason to ban the play from any standpoint. It just needs to be officiated closely to catch false starts, Offside, lining up in the neutral zone, etc.

That's what I thought. I thought players with 4 accrued seasons don't go through waivers, but everything I see says Cooks will go through waivers, so maybe the rule changed? Or I'm just missing something.

The Bills signed John Brown and Cole Beasley who were just better players. I think he was also injured in the preseason, so didn't get much practice time, so the offense just passed him by. He then bounced around on a bunch of practice squads for a couple of years.

I remember when I thought Robert Foster was going to become a good receiver. And then he disappeared forever. We'll see what Shavers turns into. That game could have been the highlight of a forgettable career, or it could be a springboard to something more. Time will tell.

Probably, but it is what it is. Every AFC contending team has at least a couple of ugly losses this year. The NFL is wide open. Any team can beat any team. There is still a lot of season left.

Everyone said that last year and we beat them. Everyone said that this year in the regular season and we beat them. Let the chips fall as they may and go beat (or lose to) whoever it is. That's all you can do.

The road to the superbowl is going to require the Bills to play tough teams.

They can sign him to the 53 if a team tries to sign him. Davis will most certainly want to stay.

Gabe can be called up a couple more times, so no need to put him on the roster yet.

The Bills will be favored in at least two out of three.

They changed the locks.

If you miss a field goal, the downside is greater the further the distance, because the opposing offense takes over from that spot. I think the risk/reward is already baked in and you actually don't see the insanely long field goals attempted unless time is expiring at the half or end of game or the team HAS to late in the game to keep their hopes alive.

Josh isn't playing particularly well right now. That's a big problem. But I think the offensive coordinator is a big part of the problem as well.

What's wrong with long field goals? You'd rather see an increase in punting?

I'd hire Daboll back in an instant if he was willing to come back.

I don't see why QBs were given all week to prepare balls for Sunday while kickers were only given an hour before the game. The standard should be the same for any ball regardless of it being kicked or thrown. So, if we are wanting kickers to have to use brand new balls, QBs should as well. I personally don't see any issue with kickers getting to prepare the balls how they want OR that they are making longer kicks because of it. Kickers back in the 90s and before could prepare the balls how they wanted as well. They introduced the 90 minute rule in 1999. If anything, they are just getting back to the way things used to be for the majority of NFL history.

As most of us here have been saying all season long.

People blamed McDermott for their strained relationship back in the day. I think it is pretty clear now that Daboll is the more difficult to get along with of the two.

Yeah, I'm fine with the play as long as refs are serious about calling Offside, lining up in the neutral zone, and false starts. Both offenses running the play and defenses defending the play are breaking the rules consistently. If the refs can't rein in the rule breaking, they'll have to ban the play altogether.

It is pretty centered around Kincaid already. Kincaid is 2nd in the league in yards and 3rd in TDs among TE's. Kincaid, Shakir, and Coleman all have about the same number of targets and receptions, so Kincaid is at least one of 3 of the receiving engines that make the offense go. What coaches have a great win percentage without a good QB?

Bills: 28 Falcons: 20

I got chastised here for saying that Allen played a poor game, but as the week goes on, more and more people seem to be agreeing. He wasn't awful. He still made plays. But he had four or five mistakes that were really costly.