I am going to defend the OP. Did you actually go an listed to decide for yourself who was right? I did last night and the OP is much closer to what was actually discussed than the "refuter". I find it interesting you latched onto the the refuter post as being correct, probably because that is the answer you like better. Kirwan absolutely said he hears about Seahawks and Bills as potential teams that could be for sale next, the whole thing is hearsay from Kirwan so take it for what that is. The overall topic was the increasing value of NFL franchises and the recent sale agreement of the Commanders.....some owners are supposedly disappointed in the low amount of 6 billion. Kirwan went on to say that when the Bills were for sale last time, one group wanted to take them to LA and owners probably were disappointed that did not happen because it would have "exponentially" increased that franchises value.
I disagree, you can go tot he App and replay. Kirwan clearly was talking about potential future franchises that may go up for sale and what he has "heard". He then also talked about some things in the past, two things can be true at the same time. The OP's take is a lot more right than this one.