I understand the inadvertent whistle rule but I am curious about other opinion about that play.
1. Do you think it impacted the play? I did not, the ball was nearly in the WR's hands when I heard the whistle. I am aware this is not open to interpretation and the call should have been replay.
2. If this were Diggs in the endzone against KC next week and the same play happens, they call inadvertent whistle and replay the down, resulting in an INT and Bills lose by 3. Would you feel they got screwed or would you feel the "refs did their job"?
For me, the refs were damned if they do and damned if they dont, I think they knew it blew midplay and thought it had no impact and then "convinced" themselves it was after the catch.....and not reviewable.