Jump to content

BullBuchanan

Community Member
  • Posts

    5,816
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by BullBuchanan

  1. You seem to not be understanding the analogy.
  2. Is this as intentionally wrong as possible?
  3. Covid was Trump's fumble. While the disease is very much ongoing, the damage of the first wave has been done. If it continues to linger at its high rate, or asecond wave hits, Biden will have to answer for whatever response and results come to bear, but much like the recession Obama inherited from Bush and the bull market Trump inherited from Obama, Biden is inheriting this mess from Trump. If he fixes it he deserves the credit, if he makes it worse it'll be on him, and if it slowly dwindles out it's neutral.
  4. What do democrats have to do with the left? The left mourned the election as soon as the DNC mounted an all out offensive against Bernie.
  5. The adults were away for too long and racoons moved in. Like I said, we cleaned up the garbage.
  6. And just think, you probably know a lot more than most.
  7. True, but at least there was a credible argument to be made that the guy running for the post shouldn't be overseeing the election and should step down. There's also a WORLD of difference between claiming voter suppression - preventing people from being able to easily vote, and voter fraud - intentionally miscounting/adding/removing ballots. One can just end up being gamesmanship - the other is treason. The arguments today aren't worth the paper that they're printed on.
  8. It also doesn't help that the guy she was running against was the guy that got to decide who was eliminated from voter rolls, how polling places were to operate and process for votes to be handled. It was one of the most egregious conflicts of interest in an election that I've seen, if not the most.
  9. It's the weakness of every QB that has ever played football from a 3rd string pee-wee player to Tom Brady, Joe Montana, Johnny U, Peyton, Brees et al. The entire point of blitzing is to make QBs do crazy, dangerous things or to sack them.
  10. I suspect he'll be charged again under a DOJ that doesn't serve as the President's personal lapdogs. As far as I have seen the case hasn't been dismissed yet. Is there updated info? https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/public-safety/michael-flynn-hearing-drop-prosecution/2020/09/28/e16d0a6a-00d1-11eb-8879-7663b816bfa5_story.html
  11. Things you wish were true, aren't things that are. That's a free lesson.
  12. That's too bad - they chose party over country countless times already.
  13. You might want to tell them that. I'm sure Manafort would like his fur coat back.
  14. Hmm, that seems like a lot of words, and what are those little black dots after some of them? Does he even know that you're supposed to end sentences with at least 3 exclamation points or question marks?!?!?!
  15. A lot of Trump's staff went to jail over that conspiracy.
  16. Yes, Josh Allen is doing this, and it's incredible. However, taking the stance that this thread is taking where it was a big forgone conclusion is insane. Claiming you saw Josh Allen's current trajectory coming out of college is the equivalent to shipping your life savings on a roulette 00 and bragging you knew it when it comes up. This kind of improvement in accuracy is so incredibly scarce over NFL history and Allen is on an unprecedented pace right now. No one is happier that I was wrong about him than I am. Searching for a long-term answer at QB in the NFL is the most awful process in sports.
  17. It was a landslide, and over 120 Trumpists got to watch each ballot be counted. If you're searching for a scandal, you may want to try a different route. What exactly is your claim?
  18. AJ Klein played great, albeit in mostly a pass rusher role. Let's let him keep doing that.
  19. East Coast Elites don't go to jail. He'll pay some fines.
  20. I mean, who cares? It's all for show anyway. Are your really going to argue that the numbers matter now?
  21. Did you even read the article? PA: At issue in the dispute is how far poll watchers are from the tables where officials are working, not whether observers are allowed. The Trump campaign argued observers were too far away, and a judge on the Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court ruled Thursday that they must be allowed within 6 feet of all ballot canvassing. MI: Lawrence Garcia, corporation counsel for the city of Detroit and a commissioner on the Detroit Election Commission, told CBS News on Wednesday the city was "not allowing more challengers in because we had gone over the 134 challenger limit for each party." "The count on the book was 250 Democrat to 225 Republican, plus or minus one or two," he said.
  22. Those people don't have a legal right to just waltz in and observe the polls. "Poll Watchers" aren't just joe shmoe off the street. They are selected via a process by the election board and there's an equal number of democrats and republicans to prevent an issue like the one Trump is claiming. The details are different for each state. In PA they were always allowed in, but there was a distance requirement trump was fighting. He got an order to increase it and election officials appealed. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/fact-check-trumps-claims-poll-watchers/
  23. Good press secretaries give the "We have to look at the tape" response instead of objectively lying. It's all absolutely spin and BS, but it shouldn't be propaganda.
×
×
  • Create New...